The use of typecheck() in KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() and friends is causing more problems than I think it's worth. Things like enums need to have their values explicitly cast, and literals all need to be very precisely typed, else a large warning will be printed.
While typechecking does have its uses, the additional overhead of having lots of needless casts -- combined with the awkward error messages which don't mention which types are involved -- makes tests less readable and more difficult to write.
By removing the typecheck() call, the two arguments still need to be of compatible types, but don't need to be of exactly the same time, which seems a less confusing and more useful compromise.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com ---
Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210507050908.1008686-1-davidgow@go... - Tidy up the patch description to note that a warning was being produced, not an error. - Add additional patches to remove many of the now unnecessary casts.
include/kunit/test.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 49601c4b98b8..4c56ffcb7403 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -775,7 +775,6 @@ void kunit_do_assertion(struct kunit *test, do { \ typeof(left) __left = (left); \ typeof(right) __right = (right); \ - ((void)__typecheck(__left, __right)); \ \ KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ __left op __right, \
Currently, the KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() and related macros assign both string arguments to variables of their own type (via typeof()). This seems to be to prevent the macro argument from being evaluated multiple times.
However, this doesn't work if one of these is a fixed-length character array, rather than a character pointer, as (for example) char[16] will always allocate a new string.
By always using 'const char*' (the type strcmp expects), we're always just taking a pointer to the string, which works even with character arrays.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com --- include/kunit/test.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210507050908.1008686-2-davidgow@go... - Fix a typo in the description ('yhis' -> 'this').
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 4c56ffcb7403..b68c61348121 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -1128,8 +1128,8 @@ do { \ fmt, \ ...) \ do { \ - typeof(left) __left = (left); \ - typeof(right) __right = (right); \ + const char *__left = (left); \ + const char *__right = (right); \ \ KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ strcmp(__left, __right) op 0, \
As the type checking is no longer excessively strict, get rid of the unsightly (char*) casts -- and comment discussing them -- from the KUnit usage page.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index 650f99590df5..756747417a19 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -465,10 +465,9 @@ fictitious example for ``sha1sum(1)``
.. code-block:: c
- /* Note: the cast is to satisfy overly strict type-checking. */ #define TEST_SHA1(in, want) \ sha1sum(in, out); \ - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in);
char out[40]; TEST_SHA1("hello world", "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed"); @@ -507,7 +506,7 @@ In some cases, it can be helpful to write a *table-driven test* instead, e.g. }; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); ++i) { sha1sum(cases[i].str, out); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, cases[i].sha1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, cases[i].sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", cases[i].str); }
@@ -568,7 +567,7 @@ Reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a struct sha1_test_case *test_param = (struct sha1_test_case *)(test->param_value);
sha1sum(test_param->str, out); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, test_param->sha1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, test_param->sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", test_param->str); }
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
As the type checking is no longer excessively strict, get rid of the unsightly (char*) casts -- and comment discussing them -- from the KUnit usage page.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com
Thanks!
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index 650f99590df5..756747417a19 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -465,10 +465,9 @@ fictitious example for ``sha1sum(1)``
.. code-block:: c
/* Note: the cast is to satisfy overly strict type-checking. */ #define TEST_SHA1(in, want) \ sha1sum(in, out); \KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in); char out[40]; TEST_SHA1("hello world", "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed");@@ -507,7 +506,7 @@ In some cases, it can be helpful to write a *table-driven test* instead, e.g. }; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); ++i) { sha1sum(cases[i].str, out);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, cases[i].sha1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, cases[i].sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", cases[i].str); }@@ -568,7 +567,7 @@ Reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a struct sha1_test_case *test_param = (struct sha1_test_case *)(test->param_value);
sha1sum(test_param->str, out);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, test_param->sha1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, test_param->sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", test_param->str); }-- 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
As the type checking is no longer excessively strict, get rid of the unsightly (char*) casts -- and comment discussing them -- from the KUnit usage page.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in property-entry-test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com ---
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c | 56 ++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c index 1106fedcceed..6071d5bc128c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c +++ b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c @@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u8(node, "prop-u8", &val_u8); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u8, 8);
error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u16(node, "prop-u16", &val_u16); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u16, 16);
error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "prop-u32", &val_u32); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u32, 32);
error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u64(node, "prop-u64", &val_u64); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u64, 64);
error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -140,19 +140,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u8(node, "prop-u8", &val_u8); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u8, 8);
error = fwnode_property_count_u8(node, "prop-u8"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[1], 9); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[1], 9);
error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 17); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -165,19 +165,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u16(node, "prop-u16", &val_u16); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u16, 16);
error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[1], 17); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[1], 17);
error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 17); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -190,19 +190,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "prop-u32", &val_u32); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u32, 32);
error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[1], 33); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[1], 33);
error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 17); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -215,19 +215,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_read_u64(node, "prop-u64", &val_u64); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u64, 64);
error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[1], 65); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[1], 65);
error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 17); KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0); @@ -358,13 +358,13 @@ static void pe_test_move_inline_u8(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, copy[0].is_inline); data_ptr = (u8 *)©[0].value; - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[0], 1); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[1], 2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[0], 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[1], 2);
KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, copy[1].is_inline); data_ptr = copy[1].pointer; - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[0], 5); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[1], 6); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[0], 5); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[1], 6);
property_entries_free(copy); }
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:31:58PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in property-entry-test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in property-entry-test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typecheck as stringently, so casting the result of strcmp() is now unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c index 55a0cfe9181d..f1e951eddb43 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c +++ b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-format.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
#define IIO_TEST_FORMAT_EXPECT_EQ(_test, _buf, _ret, _val) do { \ - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(_test, (int)strlen(_buf), _ret); \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(_test, strlen(_buf), _ret); \ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(_test, (_buf), (_val)); \ } while (0)
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typecheck as stringently, so casting the result of strcmp() is now unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:14:44 -0700 Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typecheck as stringently, so casting the result of strcmp() is now unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
Seems sensible
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly, get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 34 ++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c index bb67d159b7d8..1ed4f86291f2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c @@ -26,23 +26,23 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205)); }
@@ -67,21 +67,21 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276)); }
On Fri, 14 May 2021, at 05:02, David Gow wrote:
With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly, get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
No, happy to have that cleaned up.
Thanks David.
Acked-by: Andrew Jeffery andrew@aj.id.au
On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 21:36, David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly, get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
I guess you will funnel this via another tree than the mmc?
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Kind regards Uffe
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 34 ++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c index bb67d159b7d8..1ed4f86291f2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c @@ -26,23 +26,23 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205));}
@@ -67,21 +67,21 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276));}
-- 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 21:36, David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly, get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
I guess you will funnel this via another tree than the mmc?
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Kind regards Uffe
Yeah: the plan is to have this whole series go through the kselftest/kunit tree so we don't have to worry about potentially temporarily introducing a bunch of compiler warnings.
Cheers, -- David
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 34 ++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c index bb67d159b7d8..1ed4f86291f2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c @@ -26,23 +26,23 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205));}
@@ -67,21 +67,21 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15, aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276));}
-- 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly, get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in the thunderbolt KUnit tests are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/test.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/test.c index 5ff5a03bc9ce..247dc9f4757e 100644 --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/test.c +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/test.c @@ -384,20 +384,18 @@ static void tb_test_path_single_hop_walk(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i++; }
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data));
i = ARRAY_SIZE(test_data) - 1; tb_for_each_port_on_path(dst_port, src_port, p) { KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i--; }
@@ -443,20 +441,18 @@ static void tb_test_path_daisy_chain_walk(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i++; }
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data));
i = ARRAY_SIZE(test_data) - 1; tb_for_each_port_on_path(dst_port, src_port, p) { KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i--; }
@@ -506,20 +502,18 @@ static void tb_test_path_simple_tree_walk(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i++; }
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data));
i = ARRAY_SIZE(test_data) - 1; tb_for_each_port_on_path(dst_port, src_port, p) { KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i--; }
@@ -590,20 +584,18 @@ static void tb_test_path_complex_tree_walk(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i++; }
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data));
i = ARRAY_SIZE(test_data) - 1; tb_for_each_port_on_path(dst_port, src_port, p) { KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i--; }
@@ -693,20 +685,18 @@ static void tb_test_path_max_length_walk(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i++; }
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data));
i = ARRAY_SIZE(test_data) - 1; tb_for_each_port_on_path(dst_port, src_port, p) { KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)p->config.type, - test_data[i].type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); i--; }
@@ -780,7 +770,7 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane0(struct kunit *test)
path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, down, 8, up, 8, 0, "PCIe Down"); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, path != NULL); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) { const struct tb_port *in_port, *out_port;
@@ -789,12 +779,10 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane0(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(in_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->port, test_data[i].in_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)in_port->config.type, - test_data[i].in_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(out_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->port, test_data[i].out_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)out_port->config.type, - test_data[i].out_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type); } tb_path_free(path); } @@ -842,7 +830,7 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1(struct kunit *test)
path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, in, 9, out, 9, 1, "Video"); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, path != NULL); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) { const struct tb_port *in_port, *out_port;
@@ -851,12 +839,10 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(in_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->port, test_data[i].in_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)in_port->config.type, - test_data[i].in_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(out_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->port, test_data[i].out_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)out_port->config.type, - test_data[i].out_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type); } tb_path_free(path); } @@ -922,7 +908,7 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain(struct kunit *test)
path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, in, 9, out, 9, 1, "Video"); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, path != NULL); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) { const struct tb_port *in_port, *out_port;
@@ -931,12 +917,10 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(in_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->port, test_data[i].in_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)in_port->config.type, - test_data[i].in_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(out_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->port, test_data[i].out_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)out_port->config.type, - test_data[i].out_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type); } tb_path_free(path); } @@ -1002,7 +986,7 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain_reverse(struct kunit *test)
path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, in, 9, out, 9, 1, "Video"); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, path != NULL); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) { const struct tb_port *in_port, *out_port;
@@ -1011,12 +995,10 @@ static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain_reverse(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(in_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->port, test_data[i].in_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)in_port->config.type, - test_data[i].in_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(out_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->port, test_data[i].out_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)out_port->config.type, - test_data[i].out_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type); } tb_path_free(path); } @@ -1094,7 +1076,7 @@ static void tb_test_path_mixed_chain(struct kunit *test)
path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, in, 9, out, 9, 1, "Video"); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, path != NULL); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) { const struct tb_port *in_port, *out_port;
@@ -1103,12 +1085,10 @@ static void tb_test_path_mixed_chain(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(in_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->port, test_data[i].in_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)in_port->config.type, - test_data[i].in_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(out_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->port, test_data[i].out_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)out_port->config.type, - test_data[i].out_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type); } tb_path_free(path); } @@ -1186,7 +1166,7 @@ static void tb_test_path_mixed_chain_reverse(struct kunit *test)
path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, in, 9, out, 9, 1, "Video"); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, path != NULL); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) { const struct tb_port *in_port, *out_port;
@@ -1195,12 +1175,10 @@ static void tb_test_path_mixed_chain_reverse(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(in_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->port, test_data[i].in_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)in_port->config.type, - test_data[i].in_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(out_port->sw), test_data[i].route); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->port, test_data[i].out_port); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)out_port->config.type, - test_data[i].out_type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type); } tb_path_free(path); } @@ -1230,10 +1208,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_pcie(struct kunit *test) up = &dev1->ports[9]; tunnel1 = tb_tunnel_alloc_pci(NULL, up, down); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel1 != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel1->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_PCI); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel1->type, TB_TUNNEL_PCI); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->src_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->dst_port, up); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel1->npaths, (size_t)2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel1->npaths, 2); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel1->paths[0]->path_length, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->paths[0]->hops[1].out_port, up); @@ -1245,10 +1223,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_pcie(struct kunit *test) up = &dev2->ports[9]; tunnel2 = tb_tunnel_alloc_pci(NULL, up, down); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel2 != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel2->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_PCI); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel2->type, TB_TUNNEL_PCI); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->src_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->dst_port, up); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel2->npaths, (size_t)2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel2->npaths, 2); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel2->paths[0]->path_length, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->paths[0]->hops[1].out_port, up); @@ -1282,10 +1260,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dp(struct kunit *test)
tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dp(NULL, in, out, 0, 0); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DP); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DP); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, in); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, out); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)3); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 3); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, in); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[1].out_port, out); @@ -1328,10 +1306,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dp_chain(struct kunit *test)
tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dp(NULL, in, out, 0, 0); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DP); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DP); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, in); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, out); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)3); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 3); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 3); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, in); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[2].out_port, out); @@ -1378,10 +1356,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dp_tree(struct kunit *test)
tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dp(NULL, in, out, 0, 0); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DP); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DP); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, in); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, out); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)3); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 3); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 4); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, in); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[3].out_port, out); @@ -1443,10 +1421,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dp_max_length(struct kunit *test)
tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dp(NULL, in, out, 0, 0); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DP); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DP); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, in); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, out); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)3); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 3); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 13); /* First hop */ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, in); @@ -1499,10 +1477,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_usb3(struct kunit *test) up = &dev1->ports[16]; tunnel1 = tb_tunnel_alloc_usb3(NULL, up, down, 0, 0); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel1 != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel1->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_USB3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel1->type, TB_TUNNEL_USB3); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->src_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->dst_port, up); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel1->npaths, (size_t)2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel1->npaths, 2); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel1->paths[0]->path_length, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel1->paths[0]->hops[1].out_port, up); @@ -1514,10 +1492,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_usb3(struct kunit *test) up = &dev2->ports[16]; tunnel2 = tb_tunnel_alloc_usb3(NULL, up, down, 0, 0); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel2 != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel2->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_USB3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel2->type, TB_TUNNEL_USB3); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->src_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->dst_port, up); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel2->npaths, (size_t)2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel2->npaths, 2); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel2->paths[0]->path_length, 2); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, down); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel2->paths[0]->hops[1].out_port, up); @@ -1618,10 +1596,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dma(struct kunit *test)
tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dma(NULL, nhi, port, 8, 1, 8, 1); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DMA); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DMA); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, nhi); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, port); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 2); /* RX path */ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, port); @@ -1661,10 +1639,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dma_rx(struct kunit *test)
tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dma(NULL, nhi, port, -1, -1, 15, 2); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DMA); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DMA); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, nhi); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, port); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 1); /* RX path */ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, port); @@ -1698,10 +1676,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dma_tx(struct kunit *test)
tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dma(NULL, nhi, port, 15, 2, -1, -1); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DMA); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DMA); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, nhi); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, port); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 1); /* TX path */ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 1); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, nhi); @@ -1744,10 +1722,10 @@ static void tb_test_tunnel_dma_chain(struct kunit *test) port = &dev2->ports[3]; tunnel = tb_tunnel_alloc_dma(NULL, nhi, port, 8, 1, 8, 1); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, tunnel != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, (enum tb_tunnel_type)TB_TUNNEL_DMA); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tunnel->type, TB_TUNNEL_DMA); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->src_port, nhi); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->dst_port, port); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, (size_t)2); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->npaths, 2); /* RX path */ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->path_length, 3); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, tunnel->paths[0]->hops[0].in_port, port); @@ -1906,7 +1884,7 @@ static void tb_test_property_parse(struct kunit *test)
p = tb_property_find(dir, "vendorid", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_VALUE); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, p != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, (u32)0xa27); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, 0xa27);
p = tb_property_find(dir, "deviceid", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_TEXT); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, p != NULL); @@ -1914,7 +1892,7 @@ static void tb_test_property_parse(struct kunit *test)
p = tb_property_find(dir, "deviceid", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_VALUE); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, p != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, (u32)0xa); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, 0xa);
p = tb_property_find(dir, "missing", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_DIRECTORY); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, !p); @@ -1927,19 +1905,19 @@ static void tb_test_property_parse(struct kunit *test)
p = tb_property_find(network_dir, "prtcid", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_VALUE); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, p != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, (u32)0x1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, 0x1);
p = tb_property_find(network_dir, "prtcvers", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_VALUE); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, p != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, (u32)0x1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, 0x1);
p = tb_property_find(network_dir, "prtcrevs", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_VALUE); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, p != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, (u32)0x1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, 0x1);
p = tb_property_find(network_dir, "prtcstns", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_VALUE); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, p != NULL); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, (u32)0x0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->value.immediate, 0x0);
p = tb_property_find(network_dir, "deviceid", TB_PROPERTY_TYPE_VALUE); KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, !p); @@ -1960,7 +1938,7 @@ static void tb_test_property_format(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, dir != NULL);
ret = tb_property_format_dir(dir, NULL, 0); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(root_directory)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, ARRAY_SIZE(root_directory));
block_len = ret;
@@ -2063,7 +2041,7 @@ static void tb_test_property_copy(struct kunit *test)
/* Compare the resulting property block */ ret = tb_property_format_dir(dst, NULL, 0); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(root_directory)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, ARRAY_SIZE(root_directory));
block = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(root_directory), GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, block != NULL);
Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:32:01PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in the thunderbolt KUnit tests are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Looks good.
Does this go through KUnit tree or you want me to take it? In case of the former feel free to add:
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:08 PM Mika Westerberg mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:32:01PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in the thunderbolt KUnit tests are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Looks good.
Does this go through KUnit tree or you want me to take it? In case of the former feel free to add:
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
Thanks. I think it's probably easier for this to go in via the KUnit tree, unless Brendan or Shuah have any objections.
Cheers, -- David
On 5/14/21 1:27 AM, David Gow wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:08 PM Mika Westerberg mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:32:01PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in the thunderbolt KUnit tests are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Looks good.
Does this go through KUnit tree or you want me to take it? In case of the former feel free to add:
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
Thanks. I think it's probably easier for this to go in via the KUnit tree, unless Brendan or Shuah have any objections.
It is fine either way unless there are dependencies on the KUnit tree. I can take this in through KUnit once Brendan looks at it.
thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in the thunderbolt KUnit tests are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in sysctl-test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
kernel/sysctl-test.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl-test.c b/kernel/sysctl-test.c index ccb78509f1a8..664ded05dd7a 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl-test.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl-test.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
/* * See above. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); }
/* @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
/* * See previous comment. @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); }
/* @@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_len_is_zero(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); }
/* @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_read_but_position_set(
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len); }
/* @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)3, len); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 3, len); buffer[len] = '\0'; /* And we read 13 back out. */ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "13\n", buffer); @@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)4, len); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 4, len); buffer[len] = '\0'; - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", (char *)buffer); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", buffer); }
/* @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 9, *((int *)table.data)); }
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, user_buffer, &len, &pos)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -9, *((int *)table.data)); }
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in sysctl-test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in policy_unpack_test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c index 533137f45361..03f78a41ef79 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test)
array_size = unpack_array(puf->e, name);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, (u16)0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, 0); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET); } @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test) size = unpack_strdup(puf->e, &string, TEST_STRING_NAME);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, string, (char *)NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, string, NULL); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, start); }
@@ -391,10 +391,10 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_basic(struct kunit *test)
size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, (void *)chunk, + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET + 2); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)TEST_U16_DATA); - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, (void *)(chunk + TEST_U16_DATA)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, TEST_U16_DATA); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, (chunk + TEST_U16_DATA)); }
static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1( @@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1(
size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->end - 1); }
@@ -430,8 +430,8 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_2(
size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0); - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET); }
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in policy_unpack_test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
On 5/13/21 12:32 PM, David Gow wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, several casts in policy_unpack_test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Acked-by: John Johansen john.johansen@canonical.com
I have pulled this into the apparmor tree
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c index 533137f45361..03f78a41ef79 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test) array_size = unpack_array(puf->e, name);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, (u16)0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, 0); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET);
} @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test) size = unpack_strdup(puf->e, &string, TEST_STRING_NAME); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, string, (char *)NULL);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, string, NULL); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, start);
} @@ -391,10 +391,10 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_basic(struct kunit *test) size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, (void *)chunk,
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET + 2);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)TEST_U16_DATA);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, (void *)(chunk + TEST_U16_DATA));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, TEST_U16_DATA);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, (chunk + TEST_U16_DATA));
} static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1( @@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_1( size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->end - 1);
} @@ -430,8 +430,8 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_u16_chunk_out_of_bounds_2( size = unpack_u16_chunk(puf->e, &chunk);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, (size_t)0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, (char *)NULL);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, chunk, NULL); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_U16_OFFSET);
}
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, a cast in cmdline_kunit is no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary cast, using NULL instead of (int *) to make it clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
lib/cmdline_kunit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c index 018bfc8113c4..a72a2c16066e 100644 --- a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c +++ b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void cmdline_do_one_range_test(struct kunit *test, const char *in, n, e[0], r[0]);
p = memchr_inv(&r[1], 0, sizeof(r) - sizeof(r[0])); - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, (int *)0, "in test %u at %u out of bound", n, p - r); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %u out of bound", n, p - r); }
static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test)
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:32 AM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, a cast in cmdline_kunit is no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary cast, using NULL instead of (int *) to make it clearer.
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
lib/cmdline_kunit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c index 018bfc8113c4..a72a2c16066e 100644 --- a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c +++ b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void cmdline_do_one_range_test(struct kunit *test, const char *in, n, e[0], r[0]);
p = memchr_inv(&r[1], 0, sizeof(r) - sizeof(r[0]));
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, (int *)0, "in test %u at %u out of bound", n, p - r);
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %u out of bound", n, p - r);}
static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test)
2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros removed, a cast in cmdline_kunit is no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary cast, using NULL instead of (int *) to make it clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Andrew Jeffery -
Andy Shevchenko -
Brendan Higgins -
Daniel Latypov -
David Gow -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
John Johansen -
Jonathan Cameron -
Mika Westerberg -
Shuah Khan -
Ulf Hansson