seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index b83099160fbc..ed04b89de9c6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -194,14 +194,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ksft_set_plan(7);
ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n"); - ksft_print_msg(""); + ksft_print_msg(" "); system("uname -a");
ksft_print_msg("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); /* Avoid using "sysctl" which may not be installed. */ - ksft_print_msg(""); + ksft_print_msg(" "); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable"); - ksft_print_msg(""); + ksft_print_msg(" "); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden");
affinity();
On 6/3/24 05:54, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index b83099160fbc..ed04b89de9c6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -194,14 +194,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ksft_set_plan(7); ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n");
- ksft_print_msg("");
- ksft_print_msg(" ");
Why not delete this all together?
system("uname -a"); ksft_print_msg("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); /* Avoid using "sysctl" which may not be installed. */
- ksft_print_msg("");
- ksft_print_msg(" ");
Why not delete this all together?
system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable");
- ksft_print_msg("");
- ksft_print_msg(" ");
Why not delete this all together?
system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden"); affinity();
thanks, -- Shuah
fix the following errors by removing empty print statements: seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com --- Changes v1 -> v2: removed empty print statements --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index b83099160fbc..6fe34be6c693 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -194,14 +194,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ksft_set_plan(7);
ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n"); - ksft_print_msg(""); system("uname -a");
ksft_print_msg("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); /* Avoid using "sysctl" which may not be installed. */ - ksft_print_msg(""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable"); - ksft_print_msg(""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden");
affinity();
On 6/7/24 06:41, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
fix the following errors by removing empty print statements: seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com
Changes v1 -> v2: removed empty print statements
Kees,
Is this change okay with you. I didn't see any use for these empty ksft_print_msg().
I will take this patch if you are okay with the change.
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index b83099160fbc..6fe34be6c693 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -194,14 +194,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ksft_set_plan(7); ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n");
- ksft_print_msg(""); system("uname -a");
ksft_print_msg("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); /* Avoid using "sysctl" which may not be installed. */
- ksft_print_msg(""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable");
- ksft_print_msg(""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden");
affinity();
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:58:47PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 6/7/24 06:41, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
fix the following errors by removing empty print statements: seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com
Changes v1 -> v2: removed empty print statements
Kees,
Is this change okay with you. I didn't see any use for these empty ksft_print_msg().
I will take this patch if you are okay with the change.
Dropping these means that the "#" marks go missing. Currently:
# Running on: # Linux proton 6.5.0-25-generic #25~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Feb 20 16:09:15 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
with the proposed patch:
# Running on: Linux proton 6.5.0-25-generic #25~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Feb 20 16:09:15 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This breaks the TAP syntax for the test, so we should find a different solution.
Perhaps:
ksft_print_msg("%s", "");
?
-Kees
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index b83099160fbc..6fe34be6c693 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -194,14 +194,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ksft_set_plan(7); ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n");
- ksft_print_msg(""); system("uname -a"); ksft_print_msg("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); /* Avoid using "sysctl" which may not be installed. */
- ksft_print_msg(""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable");
- ksft_print_msg(""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden"); affinity();
thanks, -- Shuah
On 6/10/24 10:59, Kees Cook wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:58:47PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 6/7/24 06:41, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
fix the following errors by removing empty print statements: seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com
Changes v1 -> v2: removed empty print statements
Kees,
Is this change okay with you. I didn't see any use for these empty ksft_print_msg().
I will take this patch if you are okay with the change.
Dropping these means that the "#" marks go missing. Currently:
# Running on: # Linux proton 6.5.0-25-generic #25~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Feb 20 16:09:15 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
with the proposed patch:
# Running on: Linux proton 6.5.0-25-generic #25~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Feb 20 16:09:15 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This breaks the TAP syntax for the test, so we should find a different solution.
Perhaps:
ksft_print_msg("%s", "");
?
Thank you Kees. Yes that would work.
Amer, please send me v3 based on Kees's suggestions.
thanks, -- Shuah
fix the following errors by using string format specifier and an empty parameter:
seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Suggested-by: Kees Cook kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com --- v1 -> v2: removed empty print statements v2 -> v3: used Kees's suggestion --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index b83099160fbc..94886c82ae60 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -194,14 +194,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ksft_set_plan(7);
ksft_print_msg("Running on:\n"); - ksft_print_msg(""); + ksft_print_msg("%s", ""); system("uname -a");
ksft_print_msg("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); /* Avoid using "sysctl" which may not be installed. */ - ksft_print_msg(""); + ksft_print_msg("%s", ""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable"); - ksft_print_msg(""); + ksft_print_msg("%s", ""); system("grep -H . /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden");
affinity();
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 05:16:08PM +0200, Amer Al Shanawany wrote:
fix the following errors by using string format specifier and an empty parameter:
seccomp_benchmark.c:197:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 197 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:202:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 202 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~ seccomp_benchmark.c:204:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length] 204 | ksft_print_msg(""); | ^~
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260235.Uj5ug8K9-lkp@intel.com/ Suggested-by: Kees Cook kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany amer.shanawany@gmail.com
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook kees@kernel.org
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org