There is no way to set topts.repeat=1 when tc_test going to verify fail.
Maybe it's clerical error, fix it directly.
Fixes: fb66223a244f ("selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type") Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou zouyipeng@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Li Zetao lizetao1@huawei.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c index a543742cd7bd..2eb71559713c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static void verify_fail(struct kfunc_test_params *param) case tc_test: topts.data_in = &pkt_v4; topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4); - break; topts.repeat = 1; + break; }
skel = kfunc_call_fail__open_opts(&opts);
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:14:34 +0800 you wrote:
There is no way to set topts.repeat=1 when tc_test going to verify fail.
Maybe it's clerical error, fix it directly.
Fixes: fb66223a244f ("selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type") Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou zouyipeng@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Li Zetao lizetao1@huawei.com
[...]
Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix repeat option when kfunc_call verify fail https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/811915db674f
You are awesome, thank you!
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org