[adding kunit lists to cc, see lore link below for context]

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20241104141750.16119-3-ddiss@suse.de/

On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:04:21 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: ...

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):

...

...

WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: initramfs_test_cases+0x0 (section: .data) -> initramfs_test_extract (section: .init.text) WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: initramfs_test_cases+0x30 (section: .data) -> initramfs_test_fname_overrun (section: .init.text) WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: initramfs_test_cases+0x60 (section: .data) -> initramfs_test_data (section: .init.text) WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: initramfs_test_cases+0x90 (section: .data) -> initramfs_test_csum (section: .init.text) WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: initramfs_test_cases+0xc0 (section: .data) -> initramfs_test_hardlink (section: .init.text) WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: initramfs_test_cases+0xf0 (section: .data) -> initramfs_test_many (section: .init.text)

If I understand correctly, the kunit_case initramfs_test_cases[] members can't be flagged __initdata, as they need to be present post-init for results queries via debugfs.

The remaining -Wimplicit-function-declaration reports are all valid. I'll fix them in v3.

Thanks, David