Switching to libbpf 1.0 API broke test_lpm_map and test_lru_map as error reporting changed. Instead of setting errno and returning -1 bpf calls now return -Exxx directly. Drop errno checks and look at return code directly.
Fixes: b858ba8c52b6 ("selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov asavkov@redhat.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 39 +++++-------- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c | 66 ++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c index 789c9748d241..c028d621c744 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c @@ -408,16 +408,13 @@ static void test_lpm_ipaddr(void)
/* Test some lookups that should not match any entry */ inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key_ipv4->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT);
inet_pton(AF_INET, "11.11.11.11", key_ipv4->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT);
inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:ffff::", key_ipv6->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -ENOENT);
close(map_fd_ipv4); close(map_fd_ipv6); @@ -474,18 +471,15 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void) /* remove non-existent node */ key->prefixlen = 32; inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT);
key->prefixlen = 30; // unused prefix so far inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT);
key->prefixlen = 16; // same prefix as the root node inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT);
/* assert initial lookup */ key->prefixlen = 32; @@ -530,8 +524,7 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void)
key->prefixlen = 32; inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.1", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT);
close(map_fd); } @@ -552,8 +545,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) assert(map_fd >= 0);
/* empty tree. get_next_key should return ENOENT */ - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -ENOENT);
/* get and verify the first key, get the second one should fail. */ key_p->prefixlen = 16; @@ -565,8 +557,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) assert(key_p->prefixlen == 16 && key_p->data[0] == 192 && key_p->data[1] == 168);
- assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
/* no exact matching key should get the first one in post order. */ key_p->prefixlen = 8; @@ -590,8 +581,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
/* Add one more element (total three) */ key_p->prefixlen = 24; @@ -614,8 +604,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
/* Add one more element (total four) */ key_p->prefixlen = 24; @@ -643,8 +632,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
/* Add one more element (total five) */ key_p->prefixlen = 28; @@ -678,8 +666,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
/* no exact matching key should return the first one in post order */ key_p->prefixlen = 22; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c index a6aa2d121955..4d0650cfb5cd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c @@ -175,24 +175,20 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags) BPF_NOEXIST));
/* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1 - /* key=1 already exists */ - && errno == EEXIST); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST); + /* key=1 already exists */
- assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, -1) == -1 && - errno == EINVAL); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, -1) == -EINVAL);
/* insert key=2 element */
/* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
/* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 && - /* key=2 is not there */ - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT); + /* key=2 is not there */
assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST));
@@ -200,8 +196,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
/* check that key=1 can be found and mark the ref bit to * stop LRU from removing key=1 @@ -217,8 +212,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* key=2 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
/* lookup elem key=1 and delete it, then check it doesn't exist */ key = 1; @@ -381,8 +375,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity2(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) end_key = 1 + batch_size; value[0] = 4321; for (key = 1; key < end_key; key++) { - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); assert(!bpf_map_lookup_elem_with_ref_bit(lru_map_fd, key, value)); @@ -562,8 +555,7 @@ static void do_test_lru_sanity5(unsigned long long last_key, int map_fd) assert(!bpf_map_lookup_elem_with_ref_bit(map_fd, key, value));
/* Cannot find the last key because it was removed by LRU */ - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &last_key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &last_key, value) == -ENOENT); }
/* Test map with only one element */ @@ -711,21 +703,18 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags) BPF_NOEXIST));
/* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1 - /* key=1 already exists */ - && errno == EEXIST); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST); + /* key=1 already exists */
/* insert key=2 element */
/* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
/* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 && - /* key=2 is not there */ - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT); + /* key=2 is not there */
assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST));
@@ -733,8 +722,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
/* check that key=1 can be found and mark the ref bit to * stop LRU from removing key=1 @@ -757,8 +745,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* key=2 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
assert(map_equal(lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd));
@@ -805,21 +792,18 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags) assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST));
/* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1 - /* key=1 already exists */ - && errno == EEXIST); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST); + /* key=1 already exists */
/* insert key=2 element */
/* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
/* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 && - /* key=2 is not there */ - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT); + /* key=2 is not there */
assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(expected_map_fd, &key, value, @@ -829,8 +813,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
/* check that key=1 can be found and do _not_ mark ref bit. * this will be evicted on next update. @@ -853,8 +836,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* key=1 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 1; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT);
assert(map_equal(lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd));
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 5:43 PM Artem Savkov asavkov@redhat.com wrote:
Switching to libbpf 1.0 API broke test_lpm_map and test_lru_map as error reporting changed. Instead of setting errno and returning -1 bpf calls now return -Exxx directly. Drop errno checks and look at return code directly.
Fixes: b858ba8c52b6 ("selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK")
Ah, it is caused by the LIBBPF_STRICT_DIRECT_ERRS.
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov asavkov@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Yafang Shao laoar.shao@gmail.com
P.S: It seems that other files which use libbpf 1.0 API mode are also impacted, and it seems you are working on fixing them, thanks.
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 39 +++++-------- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c | 66 ++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c index 789c9748d241..c028d621c744 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c @@ -408,16 +408,13 @@ static void test_lpm_ipaddr(void)
/* Test some lookups that should not match any entry */ inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key_ipv4->data);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT); inet_pton(AF_INET, "11.11.11.11", key_ipv4->data);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT); inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:ffff::", key_ipv6->data);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -ENOENT); close(map_fd_ipv4); close(map_fd_ipv6);@@ -474,18 +471,15 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void) /* remove non-existent node */ key->prefixlen = 32; inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key->data);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT); key->prefixlen = 30; // unused prefix so far inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data);
assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT); key->prefixlen = 16; // same prefix as the root node inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data);
assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT); /* assert initial lookup */ key->prefixlen = 32;@@ -530,8 +524,7 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void)
key->prefixlen = 32; inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.1", key->data);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT); close(map_fd);} @@ -552,8 +545,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) assert(map_fd >= 0);
/* empty tree. get_next_key should return ENOENT */
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -ENOENT); /* get and verify the first key, get the second one should fail. */ key_p->prefixlen = 16;@@ -565,8 +557,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) assert(key_p->prefixlen == 16 && key_p->data[0] == 192 && key_p->data[1] == 168);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* no exact matching key should get the first one in post order. */ key_p->prefixlen = 8;@@ -590,8 +581,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* Add one more element (total three) */ key_p->prefixlen = 24;@@ -614,8 +604,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* Add one more element (total four) */ key_p->prefixlen = 24;@@ -643,8 +632,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* Add one more element (total five) */ key_p->prefixlen = 28;@@ -678,8 +666,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* no exact matching key should return the first one in post order */ key_p->prefixlen = 22;diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c index a6aa2d121955..4d0650cfb5cd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c @@ -175,24 +175,20 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags) BPF_NOEXIST));
/* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1/* key=1 already exists */&& errno == EEXIST);
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST);/* key=1 already exists */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, -1) == -1 &&errno == EINVAL);
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, -1) == -EINVAL); /* insert key=2 element */ /* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 &&/* key=2 is not there */errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT);/* key=2 is not there */ assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST));@@ -200,8 +196,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* check that key=1 can be found and mark the ref bit to * stop LRU from removing key=1@@ -217,8 +212,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* key=2 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 2;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* lookup elem key=1 and delete it, then check it doesn't exist */ key = 1;@@ -381,8 +375,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity2(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) end_key = 1 + batch_size; value[0] = 4321; for (key = 1; key < end_key; key++) {
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); assert(!bpf_map_lookup_elem_with_ref_bit(lru_map_fd, key, value));@@ -562,8 +555,7 @@ static void do_test_lru_sanity5(unsigned long long last_key, int map_fd) assert(!bpf_map_lookup_elem_with_ref_bit(map_fd, key, value));
/* Cannot find the last key because it was removed by LRU */
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &last_key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &last_key, value) == -ENOENT);}
/* Test map with only one element */ @@ -711,21 +703,18 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags) BPF_NOEXIST));
/* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1/* key=1 already exists */&& errno == EEXIST);
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST);/* key=1 already exists */ /* insert key=2 element */ /* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 &&/* key=2 is not there */errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT);/* key=2 is not there */ assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST));@@ -733,8 +722,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* check that key=1 can be found and mark the ref bit to * stop LRU from removing key=1@@ -757,8 +745,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* key=2 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 2;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); assert(map_equal(lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd));@@ -805,21 +792,18 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags) assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST));
/* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1/* key=1 already exists */&& errno == EEXIST);
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST);/* key=1 already exists */ /* insert key=2 element */ /* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 &&/* key=2 is not there */errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT);/* key=2 is not there */ assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(expected_map_fd, &key, value,@@ -829,8 +813,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* check that key=1 can be found and do _not_ mark ref bit. * this will be evicted on next update.@@ -853,8 +836,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags)
/* key=1 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 1;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 &&errno == ENOENT);
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); assert(map_equal(lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd));-- 2.35.1
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:43:20 +0200 you wrote:
Switching to libbpf 1.0 API broke test_lpm_map and test_lru_map as error reporting changed. Instead of setting errno and returning -1 bpf calls now return -Exxx directly. Drop errno checks and look at return code directly.
Fixes: b858ba8c52b6 ("selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov asavkov@redhat.com
[...]
Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix map tests errno checks https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c14766a8a8f3
You are awesome, thank you!
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Artem Savkov -
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf＠kernel.org -
Yafang Shao