On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:12, Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org wrote:

Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:14:55)

...

On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org wrote:

...

Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.

As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other architectures.

That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real topic for bikeshedding is the name.

• Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name?
• Do we want to include the architecture in the name?

Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?

I think I will drop this patch. I have overlays working. I hijacked of_core_init() to load the testcase data from drivers/of/unittest-data and made a container node for kunit overlays to apply to.

Makes sense to me, thanks!

Looking forward to seeing how the overlays work in practice!