There are several tests which depend on PCI, and hence need a bunch of extra options to run under UML. This makes it awkward to give configuration instructions (whether in documentation, or as part of a .kunitconfig file), as two separate, incompatible sets of config options are required for UML and "most other architectures".
For non-UML architectures, it's possible to add default kconfig options via the qemu_config python files, but there's no equivalent for UML. Add a new tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config file containing extra kconfig options to use on UML.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com ---
NOTE: This has dependencies on the 'make --kunitconfig repeatable' series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220624001247.3255978-1-dlatypov@go... which, in turn, depends on: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220520224200.3764027-1-dlatypov@go... Please apply those first.
Changes since RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220622035326.759935-1-davidgow@goo... - Rebase on top of the previous kconfig patches. - Fix a missing make_arch_qemuconfig->make_arch_config rename (Thanks Brendan) - Fix the tests to use the base LinuxSourceTreeOperations class, which has no default kconfig options (and so won't conflict with those set in the tests). Only test_build_reconfig_existing_config actually failed, but I updated a few more in case the defaults changed.
--- tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config | 5 +++++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 14 ++++++++++---- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e824ce43b05a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# Config options which are added to UML builds by default + +# Enable virtio/pci, as a lot of tests require it. +CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML=y +CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO=y diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index fc415ff7530e..127598fb994b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ KUNITCONFIG_PATH = '.kunitconfig' OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'last_used_kunitconfig' DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config' BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config' +UML_KCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config' OUTFILE_PATH = 'test.log' ABS_TOOL_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__)) QEMU_CONFIGS_DIR = os.path.join(ABS_TOOL_PATH, 'qemu_configs') @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations: except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
- def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: + def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: return base_kunitconfig
def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None: @@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(LinuxSourceTreeOperations): self._kernel_command_line = qemu_arch_params.kernel_command_line + ' kunit_shutdown=reboot' self._extra_qemu_params = qemu_arch_params.extra_qemu_params
- def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: + def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string(self._kconfig) kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig) return kconfig @@ -138,6 +139,11 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(LinuxSourceTreeOperations): def __init__(self, cross_compile=None): super().__init__(linux_arch='um', cross_compile=cross_compile)
+ def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: + kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(UML_KCONFIG_PATH) + kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig) + return kconfig + def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None: kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp( 'Enabling all CONFIGs for UML...') @@ -297,7 +303,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: if build_dir and not os.path.exists(build_dir): os.mkdir(build_dir) try: - self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig) + self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig) self._kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options) except ConfigError as e: @@ -328,7 +334,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
existing_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path) - self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig) + self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig)
if self._kconfig.is_subset_of(existing_kconfig) and not self._kunitconfig_changed(build_dir): return True diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index e21ae1331350..08cb2dc8ef7d 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
# Should generate the .config @@ -447,6 +451,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[])) @@ -463,6 +471,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()
# ... so we should trigger a call to build_config()
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 04:43:59PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
There are several tests which depend on PCI, and hence need a bunch of extra options to run under UML. This makes it awkward to give configuration instructions (whether in documentation, or as part of a .kunitconfig file), as two separate, incompatible sets of config options are required for UML and "most other architectures".
For non-UML architectures, it's possible to add default kconfig options via the qemu_config python files, but there's no equivalent for UML. Add a new tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config file containing extra kconfig options to use on UML.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Tested-by: José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com
After applying this patch and its dependencies, I can confirm that it is possible to run the DRM tests with the following command:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/tests
Added a TODO for myself to remove the extra flag from the DRM docs once this patch is merged.
Thanks a lot for making it easier!
Jose
NOTE: This has dependencies on the 'make --kunitconfig repeatable' series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220624001247.3255978-1-dlatypov@go... which, in turn, depends on: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220520224200.3764027-1-dlatypov@go... Please apply those first.
Changes since RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220622035326.759935-1-davidgow@goo...
- Rebase on top of the previous kconfig patches.
- Fix a missing make_arch_qemuconfig->make_arch_config rename (Thanks Brendan)
- Fix the tests to use the base LinuxSourceTreeOperations class, which has no default kconfig options (and so won't conflict with those set in the tests). Only test_build_reconfig_existing_config actually failed, but I updated a few more in case the defaults changed.
tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config | 5 +++++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 14 ++++++++++---- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e824ce43b05a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# Config options which are added to UML builds by default
+# Enable virtio/pci, as a lot of tests require it. +CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML=y +CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO=y diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index fc415ff7530e..127598fb994b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ KUNITCONFIG_PATH = '.kunitconfig' OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'last_used_kunitconfig' DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config' BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config' +UML_KCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config' OUTFILE_PATH = 'test.log' ABS_TOOL_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__)) QEMU_CONFIGS_DIR = os.path.join(ABS_TOOL_PATH, 'qemu_configs') @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations: except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
- def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
- def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: return base_kunitconfig
def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None: @@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(LinuxSourceTreeOperations): self._kernel_command_line = qemu_arch_params.kernel_command_line + ' kunit_shutdown=reboot' self._extra_qemu_params = qemu_arch_params.extra_qemu_params
- def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
- def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string(self._kconfig) kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig) return kconfig
@@ -138,6 +139,11 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(LinuxSourceTreeOperations): def __init__(self, cross_compile=None): super().__init__(linux_arch='um', cross_compile=cross_compile)
- def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(UML_KCONFIG_PATH)kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig)return kconfig- def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None: kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp( 'Enabling all CONFIGs for UML...')
@@ -297,7 +303,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: if build_dir and not os.path.exists(build_dir): os.mkdir(build_dir) try:
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig) self._kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options)@@ -328,7 +334,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options) existing_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path)
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig)if self._kconfig.is_subset_of(existing_kconfig) and not self._kunitconfig_changed(build_dir): return True diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index e21ae1331350..08cb2dc8ef7d 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have# the defaults for any given architecture get in the# way.tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()# Should generate the .config @@ -447,6 +451,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y') tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have# the defaults for any given architecture get in the# way.tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[])) @@ -463,6 +471,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y') tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have# the defaults for any given architecture get in the# way.tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start()# ... so we should trigger a call to build_config() -- 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 1:44 AM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
There are several tests which depend on PCI, and hence need a bunch of extra options to run under UML. This makes it awkward to give configuration instructions (whether in documentation, or as part of a .kunitconfig file), as two separate, incompatible sets of config options are required for UML and "most other architectures".
For non-UML architectures, it's possible to add default kconfig options via the qemu_config python files, but there's no equivalent for UML. Add a new tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config file containing extra kconfig options to use on UML.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
NOTE: This has dependencies on the 'make --kunitconfig repeatable' series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220624001247.3255978-1-dlatypov@go... which, in turn, depends on: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220520224200.3764027-1-dlatypov@go... Please apply those first.
Changes since RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220622035326.759935-1-davidgow@goo...
- Rebase on top of the previous kconfig patches.
- Fix a missing make_arch_qemuconfig->make_arch_config rename (Thanks Brendan)
- Fix the tests to use the base LinuxSourceTreeOperations class, which has no default kconfig options (and so won't conflict with those set in the tests). Only test_build_reconfig_existing_config actually failed, but I updated a few more in case the defaults changed.
tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config | 5 +++++ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 14 ++++++++++---- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e824ce43b05a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# Config options which are added to UML builds by default
+# Enable virtio/pci, as a lot of tests require it. +CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML=y +CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO=y diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index fc415ff7530e..127598fb994b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ KUNITCONFIG_PATH = '.kunitconfig' OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'last_used_kunitconfig' DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config' BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config' +UML_KCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config' OUTFILE_PATH = 'test.log' ABS_TOOL_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__)) QEMU_CONFIGS_DIR = os.path.join(ABS_TOOL_PATH, 'qemu_configs') @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations: except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: return base_kunitconfig def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None:@@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(LinuxSourceTreeOperations): self._kernel_command_line = qemu_arch_params.kernel_command_line + ' kunit_shutdown=reboot' self._extra_qemu_params = qemu_arch_params.extra_qemu_params
def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:
def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string(self._kconfig) kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig) return kconfig@@ -138,6 +139,11 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(LinuxSourceTreeOperations): def __init__(self, cross_compile=None): super().__init__(linux_arch='um', cross_compile=cross_compile)
def make_arch_config(self, base_kunitconfig: kunit_config.Kconfig) -> kunit_config.Kconfig:kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(UML_KCONFIG_PATH)kconfig.merge_in_entries(base_kunitconfig)return kconfigdef make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir: str, make_options) -> None: kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp( 'Enabling all CONFIGs for UML...')@@ -297,7 +303,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: if build_dir and not os.path.exists(build_dir): os.mkdir(build_dir) try:
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig) self._kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options) except ConfigError as e:@@ -328,7 +334,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
existing_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path)
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(self._kconfig)
self._kconfig = self._ops.make_arch_config(self._kconfig) if self._kconfig.is_subset_of(existing_kconfig) and not self._kunitconfig_changed(build_dir): return Truediff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index e21ae1331350..08cb2dc8ef7d 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y')
tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have# the defaults for any given architecture get in the# way.tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None)
This runs and typechecks under mypy, but not under pytype. The problem is that the first argument is type str, not Optional[str].
I think a fix would be to just use LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml() instead here.
Since you recently switched machines, you might want to run: $ pip install pytype
And then $ ./tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py would run pytype and show you the complaints here.
mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() # Should generate the .config@@ -447,6 +451,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have# the defaults for any given architecture get in the# way.tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[]))@@ -463,6 +471,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y')
tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have# the defaults for any given architecture get in the# way.tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() # ... so we should trigger a call to build_config()-- 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:57 PM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 1:44 AM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
There are several tests which depend on PCI, and hence need a bunch of extra options to run under UML. This makes it awkward to give configuration instructions (whether in documentation, or as part of a .kunitconfig file), as two separate, incompatible sets of config options are required for UML and "most other architectures".
For non-UML architectures, it's possible to add default kconfig options via the qemu_config python files, but there's no equivalent for UML. Add a new tools/testing/kunit/configs/arch_uml.config file containing extra kconfig options to use on UML.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com
LGTM, modulo the pytype error mentioned before.
tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir)
# Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have# the defaults for any given architecture get in the# way.tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None)This runs and typechecks under mypy, but not under pytype. The problem is that the first argument is type str, not Optional[str].
I think a fix would be to just use LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml() instead here.
Since you recently switched machines, you might want to run: $ pip install pytype
And then $ ./tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py would run pytype and show you the complaints here.
Oh, I see what you're doing here, we want to avoid the new step where UML now adds to the .kunitconfig file.
Something like this could work - tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations(None, None) + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations('none', None) or we could put 'fake', etc.
If we're not happy with using this class directly (since it's meant to subclassed), an alternative, more targeted approach could be: mock.patch.object(tree._ops, 'make_arch_config', lambda x: x).start() But I don't like this and would prefer the above.
Daniel
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Daniel Latypov -
David Gow -
José Expósito