From: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
There is not point in failing the tests when there the RTC is not present, simply skip the test.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com Tested-by: Daniel Diaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org --- tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c index 2b9d929a24ed..63ce02d1d5cc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ FIXTURE(rtc) {
FIXTURE_SETUP(rtc) { self->fd = open(rtc_file, O_RDONLY); - ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); }
FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(rtc) { @@ -42,6 +41,10 @@ TEST_F(rtc, date_read) { int rc; struct rtc_time rtc_tm;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + /* Read the RTC time/date */ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &rtc_tm); ASSERT_NE(-1, rc); @@ -85,6 +88,10 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, date_read_loop, READ_LOOP_DURATION_SEC + 2) { struct rtc_time rtc_tm; time_t start_rtc_read, prev_rtc_read;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + TH_LOG("Continuously reading RTC time for %ds (with %dms breaks after every read).", READ_LOOP_DURATION_SEC, READ_LOOP_SLEEP_MS);
@@ -119,6 +126,10 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, uie_read, NUM_UIE + 2) { int i, rc, irq = 0; unsigned long data;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + /* Turn on update interrupts */ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_UIE_ON, 0); if (rc == -1) { @@ -144,6 +155,10 @@ TEST_F(rtc, uie_select) { int i, rc, irq = 0; unsigned long data;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + /* Turn on update interrupts */ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_UIE_ON, 0); if (rc == -1) { @@ -183,6 +198,10 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_alm_set) { time_t secs, new; int rc;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm); ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -237,6 +256,10 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set) { time_t secs, new; int rc;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &alarm.time); ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -285,6 +308,10 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, alarm_alm_set_minute, 65) { time_t secs, new; int rc;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm); ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
@@ -339,6 +366,10 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set_minute, 65) { time_t secs, new; int rc;
+ if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT) + SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file); + ASSERT_NE(-1, self->fd); + rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &alarm.time); ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
On 11/15/22 13:04, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com wrote:
From: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
There is not point in failing the tests when there the RTC is not present, simply skip the test.
Could be rephrased to read:
There is no point in failing the tests when RTC is not present.
I can fix them when I apply the patch or send me v2
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com Tested-by: Daniel Diaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On 15/11/2022 13:10:45-0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 11/15/22 13:04, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com wrote:
From: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
There is not point in failing the tests when there the RTC is not present, simply skip the test.
Could be rephrased to read:
There is no point in failing the tests when RTC is not present.
I can fix them when I apply the patch or send me v2
Sorry, I wrote that quickly a few days ago and didn't check again. v2 is sent.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com Tested-by: Daniel Diaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org
thanks, -- Shuah
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org