From: Rong Tao rongtao@cestc.cn
Within __add_three() function, should use function parameters instead of global variables. So that the variables groot_nested.inner.root and groot_nested.inner.glock in rbtree_add_nodes_nested() are tested correctly.
Signed-off-by: Rong Tao rongtao@cestc.cn --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c index a3620c15c136..49fe93d7e059 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c @@ -61,19 +61,19 @@ static long __add_three(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock) } m->key = 1;
- bpf_spin_lock(&glock); - bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &n->node, less); - bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &m->node, less); - bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); + bpf_spin_lock(lock); + bpf_rbtree_add(root, &n->node, less); + bpf_rbtree_add(root, &m->node, less); + bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n)); if (!n) return 3; n->key = 3;
- bpf_spin_lock(&glock); - bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &n->node, less); - bpf_spin_unlock(&glock); + bpf_spin_lock(lock); + bpf_rbtree_add(root, &n->node, less); + bpf_spin_unlock(lock); return 0; }
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:45:14 +0800 you wrote:
From: Rong Tao rongtao@cestc.cn
Within __add_three() function, should use function parameters instead of global variables. So that the variables groot_nested.inner.root and groot_nested.inner.glock in rbtree_add_nodes_nested() are tested correctly.
[...]
Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: rbtree: Fix incorrect global variable usage https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/64a064ce33b1
You are awesome, thank you!
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org