This patch series was initially sent to security@k.o; resending it in public. I might follow-up with a tests series which addresses similar issues with TIOCLINUX.
===============
The TIOCSTI ioctl uses capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) for access control, which checks the current process's credentials. However, it doesn't validate against the file opener's credentials stored in file->f_cred.
This creates a potential security issue where an unprivileged process can open a TTY fd and pass it to a privileged process via SCM_RIGHTS. The privileged process may then inadvertently grant access based on its elevated privileges rather than the original opener's credentials.
Background ==========
As noted in previous discussion, while CONFIG_LEGACY_TIOCSTI can restrict TIOCSTI usage, it is enabled by default in most distributions. Even when CONFIG_LEGACY_TIOCSTI=n, processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN can still use TIOCSTI according to the Kconfig documentation.
Additionally, CONFIG_LEGACY_TIOCSTI controls the default value for the dev.tty.legacy_tiocsti sysctl, which remains runtime-configurable. This means the described attack vector could work on systems even with CONFIG_LEGACY_TIOCSTI=n, particularly on Ubuntu 24.04 where it's "restricted" but still functional.
Solution Approach =================
This series addresses the issue through SELinux LSM integration rather than modifying core TTY credential checking to avoid potential compatibility issues with existing userspace.
The enhancement adds proper current task and file credential capability validation in SELinux's selinux_file_ioctl() hook specifically for TIOCSTI operations.
Testing =======
All patches have been validated using: - scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict (0 errors, 0 warnings) - Functional testing on kernel v6.16-rc2 - File descriptor passing security test scenarios - SELinux policy enforcement testing
The fd_passing_security test demonstrates the security concern. To verify, disable legacy TIOCSTI and run the test:
$ echo "0" | sudo tee /proc/sys/dev/tty/legacy_tiocsti $ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tiocsti_test -t fd_passing_security
Patch Overview ==============
PATCH 1/2: selftests/tty: add TIOCSTI test suite Comprehensive test suite demonstrating the issue and fix validation
PATCH 2/2: selinux: add capability checks for TIOCSTI ioctl Core security enhancement via SELinux LSM hook
References ==========
- tty_ioctl(4) - documents TIOCSTI ioctl and capability requirements - commit 83efeeeb3d04 ("tty: Allow TIOCSTI to be disabled") - Documentation/security/credentials.rst - https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/156 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/Y0m9l52AKmw6Yxi1@hostpad/ - drivers/tty/Kconfig
Configuration References: [1] - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/driv... [2] - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/driv... [3] - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/driv...
To: Shuah Khan shuah@kernel.org To: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org To: Nick Desaulniers nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com To: Bill Wendling morbo@google.com To: Justin Stitt justinstitt@google.com To: Paul Moore paul@paul-moore.com To: Stephen Smalley stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com To: Ondrej Mosnacek omosnace@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com --- Abhinav Saxena (2): selftests/tty: add TIOCSTI test suite selinux: add capability checks for TIOCSTI ioctl
security/selinux/hooks.c | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/tty/Makefile | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/tty/config | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tiocsti_test.c | 421 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 433 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- base-commit: 5adb635077d1b4bd65b183022775a59a378a9c00 change-id: 20250618-toicsti-bug-7822b8e94a32
Best regards,
From: Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com
TIOCSTI is a TTY ioctl command that allows inserting characters into the terminal input queue, making it appear as if the user typed those characters.
Add a test suite with four tests to verify TIOCSTI behaviour in different scenarios when dev.tty.legacy_tiocsti is both enabled and disabled:
- Test TIOCSTI functionality when legacy support is enabled - Test TIOCSTI rejection when legacy support is disabled - Test capability requirements for TIOCSTI usage - Test TIOCSTI security with file descriptor passing
The tests validate proper enforcement of the legacy_tiocsti sysctl introduced in commit 83efeeeb3d04 ("tty: Allow TIOCSTI to be disabled"). See tty_ioctl(4) for details on TIOCSTI behavior and security requirements.
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com --- tools/testing/selftests/tty/Makefile | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/tty/config | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tiocsti_test.c | 421 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/Makefile index 50d7027b2ae3..7f6fbe5a0cd5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 CFLAGS = -O2 -Wall -TEST_GEN_PROGS := tty_tstamp_update +TEST_GEN_PROGS := tty_tstamp_update tty_tiocsti_test +LDLIBS += -lcap
include ../lib.mk + +# Add libcap for TIOCSTI test +$(OUTPUT)/tty_tiocsti_test: LDLIBS += -lcap diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/config b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/config new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c6373aba6636 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/config @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +CONFIG_LEGACY_TIOCSTI=y diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tiocsti_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tiocsti_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6a4b497078b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tiocsti_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,421 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * TTY Tests - TIOCSTI + * + * Copyright © 2025 Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com + */ + +#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <fcntl.h> +#include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <errno.h> +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <sys/socket.h> +#include <sys/wait.h> +#include <pwd.h> +#include <termios.h> +#include <grp.h> +#include <sys/capability.h> +#include <sys/prctl.h> + +#include "../kselftest_harness.h" + +/* Helper function to send FD via SCM_RIGHTS */ +static int send_fd_via_socket(int socket_fd, int fd_to_send) +{ + struct msghdr msg = { 0 }; + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; + char cmsg_buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))]; + char dummy_data = 'F'; + struct iovec iov = { .iov_base = &dummy_data, .iov_len = 1 }; + + msg.msg_iov = &iov; + msg.msg_iovlen = 1; + msg.msg_control = cmsg_buf; + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(cmsg_buf); + + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); + cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; + cmsg->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS; + cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(int)); + + memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cmsg), &fd_to_send, sizeof(int)); + + return sendmsg(socket_fd, &msg, 0) < 0 ? -1 : 0; +} + +/* Helper function to receive FD via SCM_RIGHTS */ +static int recv_fd_via_socket(int socket_fd) +{ + struct msghdr msg = { 0 }; + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; + char cmsg_buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))]; + char dummy_data; + struct iovec iov = { .iov_base = &dummy_data, .iov_len = 1 }; + int received_fd = -1; + + msg.msg_iov = &iov; + msg.msg_iovlen = 1; + msg.msg_control = cmsg_buf; + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(cmsg_buf); + + if (recvmsg(socket_fd, &msg, 0) < 0) + return -1; + + for (cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); cmsg; cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmsg)) { + if (cmsg->cmsg_level == SOL_SOCKET && + cmsg->cmsg_type == SCM_RIGHTS) { + memcpy(&received_fd, CMSG_DATA(cmsg), sizeof(int)); + break; + } + } + + return received_fd; +} + +static inline bool has_cap_sys_admin(void) +{ + cap_t caps = cap_get_proc(); + + if (!caps) + return false; + + cap_flag_value_t cap_val; + bool has_cap = (cap_get_flag(caps, CAP_SYS_ADMIN, CAP_EFFECTIVE, + &cap_val) == 0) && + (cap_val == CAP_SET); + + cap_free(caps); + return has_cap; +} + +/* + * Simple privilege drop that just changes uid/gid in current process + * and also capabilities like CAP_SYS_ADMIN + */ +static inline bool drop_to_nobody(void) +{ + /* Drop supplementary groups */ + if (setgroups(0, NULL) != 0) { + printf("setgroups failed: %s", strerror(errno)); + return false; + } + + /* Change group to nobody */ + if (setgid(65534) != 0) { + printf("setgid failed: %s", strerror(errno)); + return false; + } + + /* Change user to nobody (this drops capabilities) */ + if (setuid(65534) != 0) { + printf("setuid failed: %s", strerror(errno)); + return false; + } + + /* Verify we no longer have CAP_SYS_ADMIN */ + if (has_cap_sys_admin()) { + printf("ERROR: Still have CAP_SYS_ADMIN after changing to nobody"); + return false; + } + + printf("Successfully changed to nobody (uid:%d gid:%d)\n", getuid(), + getgid()); + return true; +} + +static inline int get_legacy_tiocsti_setting(void) +{ + FILE *fp; + int value = -1; + + fp = fopen("/proc/sys/dev/tty/legacy_tiocsti", "r"); + if (!fp) { + if (errno == ENOENT) { + printf("legacy_tiocsti sysctl not available (kernel < 6.2)\n"); + } else { + printf("Cannot read legacy_tiocsti: %s\n", + strerror(errno)); + } + return -1; + } + + if (fscanf(fp, "%d", &value) == 1) { + printf("legacy_tiocsti setting=%d\n", value); + + if (value < 0 || value > 1) { + printf("legacy_tiocsti unexpected value %d\n", value); + value = -1; + } else { + printf("legacy_tiocsti=%d (%s mode)\n", value, + value == 0 ? "restricted" : "permissive"); + } + } else { + printf("Failed to parse legacy_tiocsti value"); + value = -1; + } + + fclose(fp); + return value; +} + +static inline int test_tiocsti_injection(int fd) +{ + int ret; + char test_char = 'X'; + + ret = ioctl(fd, TIOCSTI, &test_char); + if (ret == 0) { + /* Clear the injected character */ + printf("TIOCSTI injection succeeded\n"); + } else { + printf("TIOCSTI injection failed: %s (errno=%d)\n", + strerror(errno), errno); + } + return ret == 0 ? 0 : -1; +} + +FIXTURE(tty_tiocsti) +{ + int tty_fd; + char *tty_name; + bool has_tty; + bool initial_cap_sys_admin; + int legacy_tiocsti_setting; +}; + +FIXTURE_SETUP(tty_tiocsti) +{ + TH_LOG("Running as UID: %d with effective UID: %d", getuid(), + geteuid()); + + self->tty_fd = open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR); + self->has_tty = (self->tty_fd >= 0); + + if (self->tty_fd < 0) + TH_LOG("Cannot open /dev/tty: %s", strerror(errno)); + + self->tty_name = ttyname(STDIN_FILENO); + TH_LOG("Current TTY: %s", self->tty_name ? self->tty_name : "none"); + + self->initial_cap_sys_admin = has_cap_sys_admin(); + TH_LOG("Initial CAP_SYS_ADMIN: %s", + self->initial_cap_sys_admin ? "yes" : "no"); + + self->legacy_tiocsti_setting = get_legacy_tiocsti_setting(); +} + +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(tty_tiocsti) +{ + if (self->has_tty && self->tty_fd >= 0) + close(self->tty_fd); +} + +/* Test case 1: legacy_tiocsti != 0 (permissive mode) */ +TEST_F(tty_tiocsti, permissive_mode) +{ + // clang-format off + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting < 0) + SKIP(return, + "legacy_tiocsti sysctl not available (kernel < 6.2)"); + + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting == 0) + SKIP(return, + "Test requires permissive mode (legacy_tiocsti=1)"); + // clang-format on + + ASSERT_TRUE(self->has_tty); + + if (self->initial_cap_sys_admin) { + ASSERT_TRUE(drop_to_nobody()); + ASSERT_FALSE(has_cap_sys_admin()); + } + + /* In permissive mode, TIOCSTI should work without CAP_SYS_ADMIN */ + EXPECT_EQ(test_tiocsti_injection(self->tty_fd), 0) + { + TH_LOG("TIOCSTI should succeed in permissive mode without CAP_SYS_ADMIN"); + } +} + +/* Test case 2: legacy_tiocsti == 0, without CAP_SYS_ADMIN (should fail) */ +TEST_F(tty_tiocsti, restricted_mode_nopriv) +{ + // clang-format off + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting < 0) + SKIP(return, + "legacy_tiocsti sysctl not available (kernel < 6.2)"); + + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting != 0) + SKIP(return, + "Test requires restricted mode (legacy_tiocsti=0)"); + // clang-format on + + ASSERT_TRUE(self->has_tty); + + if (self->initial_cap_sys_admin) { + ASSERT_TRUE(drop_to_nobody()); + ASSERT_FALSE(has_cap_sys_admin()); + } + /* In restricted mode, TIOCSTI should fail without CAP_SYS_ADMIN */ + EXPECT_EQ(test_tiocsti_injection(self->tty_fd), -1); + + /* + * it might fail with either EPERM or EIO + * EXPECT_TRUE(errno == EPERM || errno == EIO) + * { + * TH_LOG("Expected EPERM, got: %s", strerror(errno)); + * } + */ +} + +/* Test case 3: legacy_tiocsti == 0, with CAP_SYS_ADMIN (should succeed) */ +TEST_F(tty_tiocsti, restricted_mode_priv) +{ + // clang-format off + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting < 0) + SKIP(return, + "legacy_tiocsti sysctl not available (kernel < 6.2)"); + + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting != 0) + SKIP(return, + "Test requires restricted mode (legacy_tiocsti=0)"); + // clang-format on + + /* Must have CAP_SYS_ADMIN for this test */ + if (!self->initial_cap_sys_admin) + SKIP(return, "Test requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN"); + + ASSERT_TRUE(self->has_tty); + ASSERT_TRUE(has_cap_sys_admin()); + + /* In restricted mode, TIOCSTI should succeed with CAP_SYS_ADMIN */ + EXPECT_EQ(test_tiocsti_injection(self->tty_fd), 0) + { + TH_LOG("TIOCSTI should succeed in restricted mode with CAP_SYS_ADMIN"); + } +} + +/* Test TIOCSTI security with file descriptor passing */ +TEST_F(tty_tiocsti, fd_passing_security) +{ + // clang-format off + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting < 0) + SKIP(return, + "legacy_tiocsti sysctl not available (kernel < 6.2)"); + + if (self->legacy_tiocsti_setting != 0) + SKIP(return, + "Test requires restricted mode (legacy_tiocsti=0)"); + // clang-format on + + /* Must start with CAP_SYS_ADMIN */ + if (!self->initial_cap_sys_admin) + SKIP(return, "Test requires initial CAP_SYS_ADMIN"); + + int sockpair[2]; + pid_t child_pid; + + ASSERT_EQ(socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sockpair), 0); + + child_pid = fork(); + ASSERT_GE(child_pid, 0) + TH_LOG("Fork failed: %s", strerror(errno)); + + if (child_pid == 0) { + /* Child process - become unprivileged, open TTY, send FD to parent */ + close(sockpair[0]); + + TH_LOG("Child: Dropping privileges..."); + + /* Drop to nobody user (loses all capabilities) */ + drop_to_nobody(); + + /* Verify we no longer have CAP_SYS_ADMIN */ + if (has_cap_sys_admin()) { + TH_LOG("Child: Failed to drop CAP_SYS_ADMIN"); + _exit(1); + } + + TH_LOG("Child: Opening TTY as unprivileged user..."); + + int unprivileged_tty_fd = open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR); + + if (unprivileged_tty_fd < 0) { + TH_LOG("Child: Cannot open TTY: %s", strerror(errno)); + _exit(1); + } + + /* Test that we can't use TIOCSTI directly (should fail) */ + + char test_char = 'X'; + + if (ioctl(unprivileged_tty_fd, TIOCSTI, &test_char) == 0) { + TH_LOG("Child: ERROR - Direct TIOCSTI succeeded unexpectedly!"); + close(unprivileged_tty_fd); + _exit(1); + } + TH_LOG("Child: Good - Direct TIOCSTI failed as expected: %s", + strerror(errno)); + + /* Send the TTY FD to privileged parent via SCM_RIGHTS */ + TH_LOG("Child: Sending TTY FD to privileged parent..."); + if (send_fd_via_socket(sockpair[1], unprivileged_tty_fd) != 0) { + TH_LOG("Child: Failed to send FD"); + close(unprivileged_tty_fd); + _exit(1); + } + + close(unprivileged_tty_fd); + close(sockpair[1]); + _exit(0); /* Child success */ + + } else { + /* Parent process - keep CAP_SYS_ADMIN, receive FD, test TIOCSTI */ + close(sockpair[1]); + + TH_LOG("Parent: Waiting for TTY FD from unprivileged child..."); + + /* Verify we still have CAP_SYS_ADMIN */ + ASSERT_TRUE(has_cap_sys_admin()); + + /* Receive the TTY FD from unprivileged child */ + int received_fd = recv_fd_via_socket(sockpair[0]); + + ASSERT_GE(received_fd, 0) + TH_LOG("Parent: Received FD %d (opened by unprivileged process)", + received_fd); + + /* + * VULNERABILITY TEST: Try TIOCSTI with FD opened by unprivileged process + * This should FAIL even though parent has CAP_SYS_ADMIN + * because the FD was opened by unprivileged process + */ + char attack_char = 'V'; /* V for Vulnerability */ + int ret = ioctl(received_fd, TIOCSTI, &attack_char); + + TH_LOG("Parent: Testing TIOCSTI on FD from unprivileged process..."); + if (ret == 0) { + TH_LOG("*** VULNERABILITY DETECTED ***"); + TH_LOG("Privileged process can use TIOCSTI on unprivileged FD"); + } else { + TH_LOG("TIOCSTI failed on unprivileged FD: %s", + strerror(errno)); + EXPECT_EQ(errno, EPERM); + } + close(received_fd); + close(sockpair[0]); + + /* Wait for child */ + int status; + + ASSERT_EQ(waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0), child_pid); + EXPECT_EQ(WEXITSTATUS(status), 0); + ASSERT_NE(ret, 0); + } +} + +TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
From: Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com
The TIOCSTI ioctl currently only checks the current process's credentials, creating a TOCTOU vulnerability where an unprivileged process can open a TTY fd and pass it to a privileged process via SCM_RIGHTS.
Fix by requiring BOTH the file opener (file->f_cred) AND the current process to have CAP_SYS_ADMIN. This prevents privilege escalation while ensuring legitimate use cases continue to work.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/156
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 595ceb314aeb..a628551873ab 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -3847,6 +3847,12 @@ static int selinux_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, CAP_OPT_NONE, true); break;
+ case TIOCSTI: + if (!file_ns_capable(file, &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || + !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + error = -EPERM; + break; + case FIOCLEX: case FIONCLEX: if (!selinux_policycap_ioctl_skip_cloexec())
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 07:41:08PM -0600, Abhinav Saxena via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com
The TIOCSTI ioctl currently only checks the current process's credentials, creating a TOCTOU vulnerability where an unprivileged process can open a TTY fd and pass it to a privileged process via SCM_RIGHTS.
If a priviliged process has a fd, what is the problem with it using this ioctl in the firstplace?
Fix by requiring BOTH the file opener (file->f_cred) AND the current process to have CAP_SYS_ADMIN. This prevents privilege escalation while ensuring legitimate use cases continue to work.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/156
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Saxena xandfury@gmail.com
security/selinux/hooks.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 595ceb314aeb..a628551873ab 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -3847,6 +3847,12 @@ static int selinux_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, CAP_OPT_NONE, true); break;
- case TIOCSTI:
if (!file_ns_capable(file, &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))error = -EPERM;break;
Are you sure this type of policy should be in the selinux core code? Wouldn't you need a "rule" for selinux to follow (or not follow) for this type of thing and not just a blanket change to the logic?
Also, have you looked at what userspace tools actually use this ioctl to see if this change would break anything?
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Abhinav Saxena via B4 Relay -
Greg KH