The current x32 BPF JIT for shift operations is not correct when the shift amount in a register is 0. The expected behavior is a no-op, whereas the current implementation changes bits in the destination register.
The following example demonstrates the bug. The expected result of this program is 1, but the current JITed code returns 2.
r0 = 1 r1 = 1 r2 = 0 r1 <<= r2 if r1 == 1 goto end r0 = 2 end: exit
The bug is caused by an incorrect assumption by the JIT that a shift by 32 clear the register. On x32 however, shifts use the lower 5 bits of the source, making a shift by 32 equivalent to a shift by 0.
This patch fixes the bug using double-precision shifts, which also simplifies the code.
Fixes: 03f5781be2c7 ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32") Co-developed-by: Xi Wang xi.wang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Xi Wang xi.wang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson luke.r.nels@gmail.com --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 221 ++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index b29e82f190c7..f34ef513f4f9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -724,9 +724,6 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_lsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], { u8 *prog = *pprog; int cnt = 0; - static int jmp_label1 = -1; - static int jmp_label2 = -1; - static int jmp_label3 = -1; u8 dreg_lo = dstk ? IA32_EAX : dst_lo; u8 dreg_hi = dstk ? IA32_EDX : dst_hi;
@@ -745,79 +742,23 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_lsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], /* mov ecx,src_lo */ EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, src_lo, IA32_ECX));
- /* cmp ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 32); - /* Jumps when >= 32 */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2))) - EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2)); - else - EMIT2_off32(0x0F, IA32_JAE + 0x10, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 6)); - - /* < 32 */ - /* shl dreg_hi,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE0, dreg_hi)); - /* mov ebx,dreg_lo */ - EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_EBX)); + /* shld dreg_hi,dreg_lo,cl */ + EMIT3(0x0F, 0xA5, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dreg_lo)); /* shl dreg_lo,cl */ EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE0, dreg_lo));
- /* IA32_ECX = -IA32_ECX + 32 */ - /* neg ecx */ - EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, IA32_ECX)); - /* add ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX), 32); - - /* shr ebx,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE8, IA32_EBX)); - /* or dreg_hi,ebx */ - EMIT2(0x09, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_EBX)); - - /* goto out; */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2))) - EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2)); - else - EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 5)); - - /* >= 32 */ - if (jmp_label1 == -1) - jmp_label1 = cnt; + /* if ecx >= 32, mov dreg_lo into dreg_hi and clear dreg_lo */
- /* cmp ecx,64 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 64); - /* Jumps when >= 64 */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label2, 2))) - EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label2, 2)); - else - EMIT2_off32(0x0F, IA32_JAE + 0x10, jmp_label(jmp_label2, 6)); + /* cmp ecx,32 */ + EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 32); + /* skip the next two instructions (4 bytes) when < 32 */ + EMIT2(IA32_JB, 4);
- /* >= 32 && < 64 */ - /* sub ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xE8, IA32_ECX), 32); - /* shl dreg_lo,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE0, dreg_lo)); /* mov dreg_hi,dreg_lo */ EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dreg_lo)); - /* xor dreg_lo,dreg_lo */ EMIT2(0x33, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_lo));
- /* goto out; */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2))) - EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2)); - else - EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 5)); - - /* >= 64 */ - if (jmp_label2 == -1) - jmp_label2 = cnt; - /* xor dreg_lo,dreg_lo */ - EMIT2(0x33, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_lo)); - /* xor dreg_hi,dreg_hi */ - EMIT2(0x33, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dreg_hi)); - - if (jmp_label3 == -1) - jmp_label3 = cnt; - if (dstk) { /* mov dword ptr [ebp+off],dreg_lo */ EMIT3(0x89, add_2reg(0x40, IA32_EBP, dreg_lo), @@ -836,9 +777,6 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_arsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], { u8 *prog = *pprog; int cnt = 0; - static int jmp_label1 = -1; - static int jmp_label2 = -1; - static int jmp_label3 = -1; u8 dreg_lo = dstk ? IA32_EAX : dst_lo; u8 dreg_hi = dstk ? IA32_EDX : dst_hi;
@@ -857,78 +795,22 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_arsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], /* mov ecx,src_lo */ EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, src_lo, IA32_ECX));
- /* cmp ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 32); - /* Jumps when >= 32 */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2))) - EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2)); - else - EMIT2_off32(0x0F, IA32_JAE + 0x10, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 6)); - - /* < 32 */ - /* lshr dreg_lo,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE8, dreg_lo)); - /* mov ebx,dreg_hi */ - EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_EBX)); - /* ashr dreg_hi,cl */ + /* shrd dreg_lo,dreg_hi,cl */ + EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAD, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_hi)); + /* sar dreg_hi,cl */ EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xF8, dreg_hi));
- /* IA32_ECX = -IA32_ECX + 32 */ - /* neg ecx */ - EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, IA32_ECX)); - /* add ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX), 32); - - /* shl ebx,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE0, IA32_EBX)); - /* or dreg_lo,ebx */ - EMIT2(0x09, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_EBX)); - - /* goto out; */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2))) - EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2)); - else - EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 5)); - - /* >= 32 */ - if (jmp_label1 == -1) - jmp_label1 = cnt; + /* if ecx >= 32, mov dreg_hi to dreg_lo and set/clear dreg_hi depending on sign */
- /* cmp ecx,64 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 64); - /* Jumps when >= 64 */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label2, 2))) - EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label2, 2)); - else - EMIT2_off32(0x0F, IA32_JAE + 0x10, jmp_label(jmp_label2, 6)); + /* cmp ecx,32 */ + EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 32); + /* skip the next two instructions (5 bytes) when < 32 */ + EMIT2(IA32_JB, 5);
- /* >= 32 && < 64 */ - /* sub ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xE8, IA32_ECX), 32); - /* ashr dreg_hi,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xF8, dreg_hi)); /* mov dreg_lo,dreg_hi */ EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_hi)); - - /* ashr dreg_hi,imm8 */ - EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xF8, dreg_hi), 31); - - /* goto out; */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2))) - EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2)); - else - EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 5)); - - /* >= 64 */ - if (jmp_label2 == -1) - jmp_label2 = cnt; - /* ashr dreg_hi,imm8 */ + /* sar dreg_hi,31 */ EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xF8, dreg_hi), 31); - /* mov dreg_lo,dreg_hi */ - EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_hi)); - - if (jmp_label3 == -1) - jmp_label3 = cnt;
if (dstk) { /* mov dword ptr [ebp+off],dreg_lo */ @@ -948,9 +830,6 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_rsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk, { u8 *prog = *pprog; int cnt = 0; - static int jmp_label1 = -1; - static int jmp_label2 = -1; - static int jmp_label3 = -1; u8 dreg_lo = dstk ? IA32_EAX : dst_lo; u8 dreg_hi = dstk ? IA32_EDX : dst_hi;
@@ -969,77 +848,23 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_rsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk, /* mov ecx,src_lo */ EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, src_lo, IA32_ECX));
- /* cmp ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 32); - /* Jumps when >= 32 */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2))) - EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2)); - else - EMIT2_off32(0x0F, IA32_JAE + 0x10, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 6)); - - /* < 32 */ - /* lshr dreg_lo,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE8, dreg_lo)); - /* mov ebx,dreg_hi */ - EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_EBX)); + /* shrd dreg_lo,dreg_hi,cl */ + EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAD, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_hi)); /* shr dreg_hi,cl */ EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE8, dreg_hi));
- /* IA32_ECX = -IA32_ECX + 32 */ - /* neg ecx */ - EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, IA32_ECX)); - /* add ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX), 32); - - /* shl ebx,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE0, IA32_EBX)); - /* or dreg_lo,ebx */ - EMIT2(0x09, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_EBX)); + /* if ecx >= 32, mov dreg_hi to dreg_lo and clear dreg_hi */
- /* goto out; */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2))) - EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2)); - else - EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 5)); - - /* >= 32 */ - if (jmp_label1 == -1) - jmp_label1 = cnt; - /* cmp ecx,64 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 64); - /* Jumps when >= 64 */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label2, 2))) - EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label2, 2)); - else - EMIT2_off32(0x0F, IA32_JAE + 0x10, jmp_label(jmp_label2, 6)); + /* cmp ecx,32 */ + EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), 32); + /* skip the next two instructions (4 bytes) when < 32 */ + EMIT2(IA32_JB, 4);
- /* >= 32 && < 64 */ - /* sub ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xE8, IA32_ECX), 32); - /* shr dreg_hi,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE8, dreg_hi)); /* mov dreg_lo,dreg_hi */ EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_hi)); /* xor dreg_hi,dreg_hi */ EMIT2(0x33, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dreg_hi));
- /* goto out; */ - if (is_imm8(jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2))) - EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 2)); - else - EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_label(jmp_label3, 5)); - - /* >= 64 */ - if (jmp_label2 == -1) - jmp_label2 = cnt; - /* xor dreg_lo,dreg_lo */ - EMIT2(0x33, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_lo)); - /* xor dreg_hi,dreg_hi */ - EMIT2(0x33, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dreg_hi)); - - if (jmp_label3 == -1) - jmp_label3 = cnt; - if (dstk) { /* mov dword ptr [ebp+off],dreg_lo */ EMIT3(0x89, add_2reg(0x40, IA32_EBP, dreg_lo),
The current x32 BPF JIT does not correctly compile shift operations when the immediate shift amount is 0. The expected behavior is for this to be a no-op.
The following program demonstrates the bug. The expexceted result is 1, but the current JITed code returns 2.
r0 = 1 r1 = 1 r1 <<= 0 if r1 == 1 goto end r0 = 2 end: exit
This patch simplifies the code and fixes the bug.
Fixes: 03f5781be2c7 ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32") Co-developed-by: Xi Wang xi.wang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Xi Wang xi.wang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson luke.r.nels@gmail.com --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 63 ++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index f34ef513f4f9..1d12d2174085 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -894,27 +894,10 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_lsh_i64(const u8 dst[], const u32 val, } /* Do LSH operation */ if (val < 32) { - /* shl dreg_hi,imm8 */ - EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xE0, dreg_hi), val); - /* mov ebx,dreg_lo */ - EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_EBX)); + /* shld dreg_hi,dreg_lo,imm8 */ + EMIT4(0x0F, 0xA4, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dreg_lo), val); /* shl dreg_lo,imm8 */ EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xE0, dreg_lo), val); - - /* IA32_ECX = 32 - val */ - /* mov ecx,val */ - EMIT2(0xB1, val); - /* movzx ecx,ecx */ - EMIT3(0x0F, 0xB6, add_2reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX, IA32_ECX)); - /* neg ecx */ - EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, IA32_ECX)); - /* add ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX), 32); - - /* shr ebx,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE8, IA32_EBX)); - /* or dreg_hi,ebx */ - EMIT2(0x09, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_EBX)); } else if (val >= 32 && val < 64) { u32 value = val - 32;
@@ -960,27 +943,10 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_rsh_i64(const u8 dst[], const u32 val,
/* Do RSH operation */ if (val < 32) { - /* shr dreg_lo,imm8 */ - EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xE8, dreg_lo), val); - /* mov ebx,dreg_hi */ - EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_EBX)); + /* shrd dreg_lo,dreg_hi,imm8 */ + EMIT4(0x0F, 0xAC, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_hi), val); /* shr dreg_hi,imm8 */ EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xE8, dreg_hi), val); - - /* IA32_ECX = 32 - val */ - /* mov ecx,val */ - EMIT2(0xB1, val); - /* movzx ecx,ecx */ - EMIT3(0x0F, 0xB6, add_2reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX, IA32_ECX)); - /* neg ecx */ - EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, IA32_ECX)); - /* add ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX), 32); - - /* shl ebx,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE0, IA32_EBX)); - /* or dreg_lo,ebx */ - EMIT2(0x09, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_EBX)); } else if (val >= 32 && val < 64) { u32 value = val - 32;
@@ -1025,27 +991,10 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_arsh_i64(const u8 dst[], const u32 val, } /* Do RSH operation */ if (val < 32) { - /* shr dreg_lo,imm8 */ - EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xE8, dreg_lo), val); - /* mov ebx,dreg_hi */ - EMIT2(0x8B, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_EBX)); + /* shrd dreg_lo,dreg_hi,imm8 */ + EMIT4(0x0F, 0xAC, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dreg_hi), val); /* ashr dreg_hi,imm8 */ EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xF8, dreg_hi), val); - - /* IA32_ECX = 32 - val */ - /* mov ecx,val */ - EMIT2(0xB1, val); - /* movzx ecx,ecx */ - EMIT3(0x0F, 0xB6, add_2reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX, IA32_ECX)); - /* neg ecx */ - EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, IA32_ECX)); - /* add ecx,32 */ - EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX), 32); - - /* shl ebx,cl */ - EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(0xE0, IA32_EBX)); - /* or dreg_lo,ebx */ - EMIT2(0x09, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_EBX)); } else if (val >= 32 && val < 64) { u32 value = val - 32;
There are currently no tests for ALU64 shift operations when the shift amount is 0. This adds 6 new tests to make sure they are equivalent to a no-op. The x32 JIT had such bugs that could have been caught by these tests.
Cc: Xi Wang xi.wang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson luke.r.nels@gmail.com --- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_instr.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_instr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_instr.c index ed91a7b9a456..071dbc889e8c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_instr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_instr.c @@ -90,6 +90,91 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT, }, +{ + "lsh64 by 0 imm", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 1, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, +{ + "rsh64 by 0 imm", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0x100000000LL), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, +{ + "arsh64 by 0 imm", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0x100000000LL), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, +{ + "lsh64 by 0 reg", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 1, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, +{ + "rsh64 by 0 reg", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0x100000000LL), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, +{ + "arsh64 by 0 reg", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0x100000000LL), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, { "invalid 64-bit BPF_END", .insns = {
On 06/29/2019 07:57 AM, Luke Nelson wrote:
The current x32 BPF JIT for shift operations is not correct when the shift amount in a register is 0. The expected behavior is a no-op, whereas the current implementation changes bits in the destination register.
The following example demonstrates the bug. The expected result of this program is 1, but the current JITed code returns 2.
r0 = 1 r1 = 1 r2 = 0 r1 <<= r2 if r1 == 1 goto end r0 = 2 end: exit
The bug is caused by an incorrect assumption by the JIT that a shift by 32 clear the register. On x32 however, shifts use the lower 5 bits of the source, making a shift by 32 equivalent to a shift by 0.
This patch fixes the bug using double-precision shifts, which also simplifies the code.
Fixes: 03f5781be2c7 ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32") Co-developed-by: Xi Wang xi.wang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Xi Wang xi.wang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson luke.r.nels@gmail.com
Series applied, thanks!
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Daniel Borkmann -
Luke Nelson