On 11/6/25 3:04 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:

There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK message. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King coking@nvidia.com

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c index dd4c35c0e428..04f9a5e73e5e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xsk.c @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void test_xsk(const struct test_spec *test_to_run, enum test_mode mode) if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ifobj_rx, "create ifobj_rx")) goto delete_tx;

• if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "conigure ifobj"))

• if (!ASSERT_OK(configure_ifobj(ifobj_tx, ifobj_rx), "configure ifobj"))

Please squash with another typo fixes (https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251106110016.15960-1-coking@nvidia.com/) into one single patch and use the "bpf-next" tag.

pw-bot: cr

goto delete_rx;

ret = get_hw_ring_size(ifobj_tx->ifname, &ifobj_tx->ring);