- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH RESEND 2 00/16] Resend bitmap patches

by Yury Norov

Hi Stephen, Can you please take this series into the next tree? It has been already in next-tree for 5.14: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/YSeduU41Ef568xhS@alley/T/ But it was damaged and we decided to merge it in 5.15 cycle. No changes comparing to 5.14, except for Andy's patch that was already upstreamed and therefore removed from here. The git tree is here: https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/bitmap-20210929 Thanks, Yury Yury Norov (16): bitops: protect find_first_{,zero}_bit properly bitops: move find_bit_*_le functions from le.h to find.h include: move find.h from asm_generic to linux arch: remove GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT entirely lib: add find_first_and_bit() cpumask: use find_first_and_bit() all: replace find_next{,_zero}_bit with find_first{,_zero}_bit where appropriate tools: sync tools/bitmap with mother linux cpumask: replace cpumask_next_* with cpumask_first_* where appropriate include/linux: move for_each_bit() macros from bitops.h to find.h find: micro-optimize for_each_{set,clear}_bit() Replace for_each_*_bit_from() with for_each_*_bit() where appropriate mm/percpu: micro-optimize pcpu_is_populated() bitmap: unify find_bit operations lib: bitmap: add performance test for bitmap_print_to_pagebuf vsprintf: rework bitmap_list_string MAINTAINERS | 4 +- arch/alpha/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 - arch/arc/Kconfig | 1 - arch/arc/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 - arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/csky/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/h8300/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/ia64/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 - arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 - arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 - arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/openrisc/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/parisc/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 - arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 - arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputhreads.h | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/dma_lib.c | 4 +- arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 - arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 +- arch/sh/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - arch/sparc/include/asm/bitops_32.h | 1 - arch/sparc/include/asm/bitops_64.h | 2 - arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 - arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 - arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 4 +- arch/x86/um/Kconfig | 1 - arch/xtensa/include/asm/bitops.h | 1 - block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c | 2 +- drivers/dma/ti/edma.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c | 4 +- drivers/hwmon/ltc2992.c | 3 +- drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c | 2 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c | 16 +- drivers/media/cec/core/cec-core.c | 2 +- drivers/media/mc/mc-devnode.c | 2 +- drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 2 +- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 2 +- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 10 +- drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_portal.c | 2 +- drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_portal.c | 2 +- drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c | 4 +- drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 2 +- drivers/virt/acrn/ioreq.c | 3 +- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 8 +- fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 4 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 18 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 2 +- include/asm-generic/bitops.h | 1 - include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h | 64 --- include/linux/bitmap.h | 34 +- include/linux/bitops.h | 34 -- include/linux/cpumask.h | 46 ++- include/linux/find.h | 372 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 +- lib/Kconfig | 3 - lib/find_bit.c | 21 + lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 21 + lib/genalloc.c | 2 +- lib/test_bitmap.c | 37 ++ lib/vsprintf.c | 24 +- mm/percpu.c | 35 +- net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c | 4 +- tools/include/asm-generic/bitops.h | 1 - tools/include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h | 145 ------- tools/include/linux/bitmap.h | 7 +- .../bitops => tools/include/linux}/find.h | 54 ++- tools/lib/find_bit.c | 20 + 75 files changed, 637 insertions(+), 441 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/find.h delete mode 100644 tools/include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h rename {include/asm-generic/bitops => tools/include/linux}/find.h (83%) -- 2.30.2

3 years, 11 months

2
4
0 0

[REGRESSION] lkft kselftest for next-20211001

by lkft＠linaro.org

## Build * kernel: 5.15.0-rc3 * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next'] * git branch: master * git commit: a25006a77348ba06c7bc96520d331cd9dd370715 * git describe: next-20211001 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20211001 ## Regressions (compared to next-20210923) * qemu-arm64-mte, kselftest-timers - timers.rtcpie * qemu_i386, kselftest-rtc - rtc.rtctest Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> ## Fixes (compared to next-20210923) * dragonboard-410c, kselftest-net - net.udpgso_bench.sh * hi6220-hikey, kselftest-kvm - kvm.rseq_test * qemu-arm64-gic-version2, kselftest-timers - timers.rtcpie * qemu-arm64-gic-version3, kselftest-cgroup - cgroup.test_freezer - cgroup.test_freezer.test_cgfreezer_ptrace * qemu_arm, kselftest-rtc - rtc.rtctest * qemu_x86_64, kselftest-rtc - rtc.rtctest ## Test result summary total: 5371, pass: 3101, fail: 459, skip: 1811, xfail: 0 ## Build Summary ## Test suites summary * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

3 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

Re:Urgent Response

by Luis Fernandez

Good day, My name is Luis Fernandez.I would like to discuss something important that will benefit both of us. I will send you more details upon your response Regards Luis Fernandez

3 years, 11 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/3] kunit: allow running test suites/cases individually

by Daniel Latypov

Allow running each suite or each test case alone per kernel boot. The motivation for this is to debug "test hermeticity" issues. This new --run_isolated flag would be a good first step to try and narrow down root causes. Context: sometimes tests pass/fail depending on what ran before them. Memory corruption errors in particular might only cause noticeable issues later on. But you can also have the opposite, where "fixing" one test causes another to start failing. Usage: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test example The last one would provide output like ======== [PASSED] example ======== [PASSED] example_simple_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped. Starting KUnit Kernel (2/3)... ============================================================ ======== [SKIPPED] example ======== [SKIPPED] example_skip_test # SKIP this test should be skipped ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 1 skipped. Starting KUnit Kernel (3/3)... ============================================================ ======== [SKIPPED] example ======== [SKIPPED] example_mark_skipped_test # SKIP this test should be skipped ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 1 skipped. See the last patch's description for a bit more detail. Meta: The first patch is from another series with just a reworded commit message, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210805235145.2528054-2-dlatypov@g… This patch series is based on Shuah's kunit branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/?… Changes: v1 -> v2: rebase onto Shuah's kunit branch, fix missing code in patch 1. v2 -> v3: fix mypy errors, drop test plan from output, fix pre-existing bug where kunit was not actually tracking test execution time (new patch 3). Daniel Latypov (4): kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests kunit: tool: factor exec + parse steps into a function kunit: tool: actually track how long it took to run tests kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately lib/kunit/executor.c | 45 ++++++++- tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 129 +++++++++++++++++-------- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 40 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) base-commit: 3b29021ddd10cfb6b2565c623595bd3b02036f33 -- 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog

3 years, 11 months

2
7
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/5] kunit: build kunit tests without structleak plugin

by Brendan Higgins

The structleak plugin causes the stack frame size to grow immensely when used with KUnit; this is caused because KUnit allocates lots of moderately sized structs on the stack as part of its assertion macro implementation. For most tests with small to moderately sized tests cases there are never enough KUnit assertions to be an issue at all; even when a single test cases has many KUnit assertions, the compiler should never put all these struct allocations on the stack at the same time since the scope of the structs is so limited; however, the structleak plugin does not seem to respect the compiler doing the right thing and will still warn of excessive stack size in some cases. These patches are not a permanent solution since new tests can be added with huge test cases, but this serves as a stop gap to stop structleak from being used on KUnit tests which will currently result in excessive stack size. Please see the discussion thread here[1] for more context. Changes since last revision: - Dropped mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed patch since it was not a pure test and I could not reproduce the stack size warning anyway. - Removed Wframe-larger-than=10240 warning from the bitfield kunit test. - All other patches are the same except with updated reviewers/contributor commit footers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAFd5g44udqkDiYBWh+VeDVJ=ELXeoXwun… Arnd Bergmann (1): bitfield: build kunit tests without structleak plugin Brendan Higgins (4): gcc-plugins/structleak: add makefile var for disabling structleak iio/test-format: build kunit tests without structleak plugin device property: build kunit tests without structleak plugin thunderbolt: build kunit tests without structleak plugin drivers/base/test/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/iio/test/Makefile | 1 + drivers/thunderbolt/Makefile | 1 + lib/Makefile | 2 +- scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins | 4 ++++ 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) base-commit: 02d5e016800d082058b3d3b7c3ede136cdc6ddcb -- 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog

3 years, 11 months

2
6
0 0

[PATCH v1 0/6] kunit: build kunit tests without structleak plugin

by Brendan Higgins

The structleak plugin causes the stack frame size to grow immensely when used with KUnit; this is caused because KUnit allocates lots of moderately sized structs on the stack as part of its assertion macro implementation. For most tests with small to moderately sized tests cases there are never enough KUnit assertions to be an issue at all; even when a single test cases has many KUnit assertions, the compiler should never put all these struct allocations on the stack at the same time since the scope of the structs is so limited; however, the structleak plugin does not seem to respect the compiler doing the right thing and will still warn of excessive stack size in some cases. These patches are not a permanent solution since new tests can be added with huge test cases, but this serves as a stop gap to stop structleak from being used on KUnit tests which will currently result in excessive stack size. Of the following patches, I think the thunderbolt patch may be unnecessary since Linus already fixed that test. Additionally, I was not able to reproduce the error on the sdhci-of-aspeed test. Nevertheless, I included these tests cases for completeness. Please see my discussion with Arnd for more context[1]. NOTE: Arnd did the legwork for most of these patches, but did not actually share code for some of them, so I left his Signed-off-by off of those patches as I don't want to misrepresent him. Arnd, please sign off on those patches at your soonest convenience. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAFd5g44udqkDiYBWh+VeDVJ=ELXeoXwun… Arnd Bergmann (1): bitfield: build kunit tests without structleak plugin Brendan Higgins (5): gcc-plugins/structleak: add makefile var for disabling structleak iio/test-format: build kunit tests without structleak plugin device property: build kunit tests without structleak plugin thunderbolt: build kunit tests without structleak plugin mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: build kunit tests without structleak plugin drivers/base/test/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/iio/test/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/thunderbolt/Makefile | 1 + lib/Makefile | 2 +- scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins | 4 ++++ 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) base-commit: 316346243be6df12799c0b64b788e06bad97c30b -- 2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog

3 years, 11 months

6
22
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/3] kunit: allow running test suites/cases individually

by Daniel Latypov

Allow running each suite or each test case alone per kernel boot. The motivation for this is to debug "test hermeticity" issues. This new --run_isolated flag would be a good first step to try and narrow down root causes. Context: sometimes tests pass/fail depending on what ran before them. Memory corruption errors in particular might only cause noticeable issues later on. But you can also have the opposite, where "fixing" one test causes another to start failing. Usage: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=suite $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --run_isolated=test example The last one would provide output like ======== [PASSED] example ======== [PASSED] example_simple_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped. Starting KUnit Kernel (2/3)... ============================================================ ======== [SKIPPED] example ======== [SKIPPED] example_skip_test # SKIP this test should be skipped ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 1 skipped. Starting KUnit Kernel (3/3)... ============================================================ ======== [SKIPPED] example ======== [SKIPPED] example_mark_skipped_test # SKIP this test should be skipped ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 1 skipped. See the last patch's description for a bit more detail. Meta: The first patch is from another series with just a reworded commit message, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210805235145.2528054-2-dlatypov@g… This patch series is based on Shuah's kunit branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/?… Changes: v1 -> v2: rebase onto Shuah's kunit branch, fix missing code in patch 1. Daniel Latypov (3): kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests kunit: tool: factor exec + parse steps into a function kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately lib/kunit/executor.c | 45 ++++++++- tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 127 +++++++++++++++++-------- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 40 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) base-commit: 3b29021ddd10cfb6b2565c623595bd3b02036f33 -- 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog

3 years, 11 months

2
8
0 0

[PATCH 1/1] selftests: KVM: set affinity of VM to right CPUs

by Dongli Zhang

The nr_cpus = CPU_COUNT(&possible_mask) is the number of available CPUs in possible_mask. As a result, the "cpu = i % nr_cpus" may always return CPU that is not available in possible_mask. Suppose the server has 8 CPUs. The below Failure is encountered immediately if the task is bound to CPU 5 and 6. ==== Test Assertion Failure ==== rseq_test.c:228: i > (NR_TASK_MIGRATIONS / 2) pid=10127 tid=10127 errno=4 - Interrupted system call 1 0x00000000004018e5: main at rseq_test.c:227 2 0x00007fcc8fc66bf6: ?? ??:0 3 0x0000000000401959: _start at ??:? Only performed 4 KVM_RUNs, task stalled too much? Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang(a)oracle.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c index c5e0dd664a7b..41df5173970c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <signal.h> #include <syscall.h> #include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <sys/sysinfo.h> #include <asm/barrier.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/rseq.h> @@ -43,6 +44,18 @@ static bool done; static atomic_t seq_cnt; +static int get_max_cpu_idx(void) +{ + int nproc = get_nprocs_conf(); + int i, max = -ENOENT; + + for (i = 0; i < nproc; i++) + if (CPU_ISSET(i, &possible_mask)) + max = i; + + return max; +} + static void guest_code(void) { for (;;) @@ -61,10 +74,13 @@ static void *migration_worker(void *ign) { cpu_set_t allowed_mask; int r, i, nr_cpus, cpu; + int max_cpu_idx; CPU_ZERO(&allowed_mask); - nr_cpus = CPU_COUNT(&possible_mask); + max_cpu_idx = get_max_cpu_idx(); + TEST_ASSERT(max_cpu_idx >= 0, "Invalid possible_mask"); + nr_cpus = max_cpu_idx + 1; for (i = 0; i < NR_TASK_MIGRATIONS; i++) { cpu = i % nr_cpus; -- 2.17.1

3 years, 11 months

2
4
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates

by Mark Brown

This series fixes up a few issues introduced into vec-syscfg during refactoring in the review process, then adds a new test which ensures that the behaviour when we attempt to set a vector length which is not supported by the current system matches what is documented in the SVE ABI documentation. v2: - Fix handling of missing VLs when checking that vector length setting works as expected. Mark Brown (4): selftests: arm64: Fix printf() format mismatch in vec-syscfg selftests: arm64: Remove bogus error check on writing to files selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) base-commit: 6880fa6c56601bb8ed59df6c30fd390cc5f6dd8f -- 2.20.1

3 years, 11 months

4
12
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates

by Mark Brown

This series fixes up a few issues introduced into vec-syscfg during refactoring in the review process, then adds a new test which ensures that the behaviour when we attempt to set a vector length which is not supported by the current system matches what is documented in the SVE ABI documentation. v3: - Rebased onto v5.14-rc3. - Check to see if we discovered the system vector lengths before trying to set all possible vector lengths since we need that information to validate the results. v2: - Fix handling of missing VLs when checking that vector length setting works as expected. Mark Brown (4): selftests: arm64: Fix printf() format mismatch in vec-syscfg selftests: arm64: Remove bogus error check on writing to files selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) base-commit: 5816b3e6577eaa676ceb00a848f0fd65fe2adc29 -- 2.20.1

3 years, 11 months

2
5
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror