- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 08/17] selftests/tc-testings: Be compatible with newer tc output

by Sasha Levin

From: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> [ Upstream commit ac2944abe4d7732f29a79f063c9cae7df2a3e3cc ] old tc(iproute2-5.9.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 60 tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe newer tc(iproute2-5.14.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 64 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe It can fix below errors: # ok 260 f84a - Add cBPF action with invalid bytecode # not ok 261 e939 - Add eBPF action with valid object-file # Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output: # total acts 0 # # action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 42 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe # index 667 ref 1 bind 0 Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json index 1a9b282dd0be2..7590f883d7edf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC action add action bpf object-file $EBPFDIR/action.o section action-ok index 667", "expExitCode": "0", "verifyCmd": "$TC action get action bpf index 667", - "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9]* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", + "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9].* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", "matchCount": "1", "teardown": [ "$TC action flush action bpf", -- 2.33.0

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 09/25] selftests/tc-testings: Be compatible with newer tc output

by Sasha Levin

From: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> [ Upstream commit ac2944abe4d7732f29a79f063c9cae7df2a3e3cc ] old tc(iproute2-5.9.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 60 tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe newer tc(iproute2-5.14.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 64 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe It can fix below errors: # ok 260 f84a - Add cBPF action with invalid bytecode # not ok 261 e939 - Add eBPF action with valid object-file # Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output: # total acts 0 # # action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 42 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe # index 667 ref 1 bind 0 Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json index 47a3082b66613..8feaa712a7f5a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC action add action bpf object-file $EBPFDIR/action.o section action-ok index 667", "expExitCode": "0", "verifyCmd": "$TC action get action bpf index 667", - "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9]* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", + "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9].* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", "matchCount": "1", "teardown": [ "$TC action flush action bpf" -- 2.33.0

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 20/43] selftests/tc-testings: Be compatible with newer tc output

by Sasha Levin

From: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> [ Upstream commit ac2944abe4d7732f29a79f063c9cae7df2a3e3cc ] old tc(iproute2-5.9.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 60 tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe newer tc(iproute2-5.14.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 64 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe It can fix below errors: # ok 260 f84a - Add cBPF action with invalid bytecode # not ok 261 e939 - Add eBPF action with valid object-file # Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output: # total acts 0 # # action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 42 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe # index 667 ref 1 bind 0 Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json index 503982b8f295b..91832400ddbdb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC action add action bpf object-file $EBPFDIR/action.o section action-ok index 667", "expExitCode": "0", "verifyCmd": "$TC action get action bpf index 667", - "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9]* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", + "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9].* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", "matchCount": "1", "teardown": [ "$TC action flush action bpf" -- 2.33.0

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 31/68] selftests/tc-testings: Be compatible with newer tc output

by Sasha Levin

From: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> [ Upstream commit ac2944abe4d7732f29a79f063c9cae7df2a3e3cc ] old tc(iproute2-5.9.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 60 tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe newer tc(iproute2-5.14.0) output: action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 64 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe It can fix below errors: # ok 260 f84a - Add cBPF action with invalid bytecode # not ok 261 e939 - Add eBPF action with valid object-file # Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output: # total acts 0 # # action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 42 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe # index 667 ref 1 bind 0 Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json index 503982b8f295b..91832400ddbdb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC action add action bpf object-file $EBPFDIR/action.o section action-ok index 667", "expExitCode": "0", "verifyCmd": "$TC action get action bpf index 667", - "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9]* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", + "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9].* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref", "matchCount": "1", "teardown": [ "$TC action flush action bpf" -- 2.33.0

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 30/68] selftests/tc-testing: match any qdisc type

by Sasha Levin

From: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> [ Upstream commit bdf1565fe03d29777d24e239163d0d53e4af9ce0 ] We should not always presume all kernels use pfifo_fast as the default qdisc. For example, a fq_codel qdisk could have below output: qdisc fq_codel 0: parent 1:4 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 target 5ms interval 100ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn drop_batch 64 Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Suggested-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye(a)bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- .../selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/mq.json | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/mq.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/mq.json index 88a20c781e498..c6046096d9db8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/mq.json +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/mq.json @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC qdisc add dev $ETH root handle 1: mq", "expExitCode": "0", "verifyCmd": "$TC qdisc show dev $ETH", - "matchPattern": "qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:[1-4] bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", + "matchPattern": "qdisc [a-zA-Z0-9_]+ 0: parent 1:[1-4]", "matchCount": "4", "teardown": [ "echo \"1\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC qdisc add dev $ETH root handle 1: mq", "expExitCode": "0", "verifyCmd": "$TC qdisc show dev $ETH", - "matchPattern": "qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:[1-9,a-f][0-9,a-f]{0,2} bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", + "matchPattern": "qdisc [a-zA-Z0-9_]+ 0: parent 1:[1-9,a-f][0-9,a-f]{0,2}", "matchCount": "256", "teardown": [ "echo \"1\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC qdisc add dev $ETH root handle 1: mq", "expExitCode": "2", "verifyCmd": "$TC qdisc show dev $ETH", - "matchPattern": "qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:[1-4] bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", + "matchPattern": "qdisc [a-zA-Z0-9_]+ 0: parent 1:[1-4]", "matchCount": "4", "teardown": [ "echo \"1\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC qdisc del dev $ETH root handle 1: mq", "expExitCode": "2", "verifyCmd": "$TC qdisc show dev $ETH", - "matchPattern": "qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:[1-4] bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", + "matchPattern": "qdisc [a-zA-Z0-9_]+ 0: parent 1:[1-4]", "matchCount": "0", "teardown": [ "echo \"1\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC qdisc del dev $ETH root handle 1: mq", "expExitCode": "2", "verifyCmd": "$TC qdisc show dev $ETH", - "matchPattern": "qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:[1-4] bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", + "matchPattern": "qdisc [a-zA-Z0-9_]+ 0: parent 1:[1-4]", "matchCount": "0", "teardown": [ "echo \"1\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ "cmdUnderTest": "$TC qdisc add dev $ETH root handle 1: mq", "expExitCode": "2", "verifyCmd": "$TC qdisc show dev $ETH", - "matchPattern": "qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:[1-4] bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", + "matchPattern": "qdisc [a-zA-Z0-9_]+ 0: parent 1:[1-4]", "matchCount": "0", "teardown": [ "echo \"1\" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device" -- 2.33.0

3 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/6] nSVM optional features

by Maxim Levitsky

This is a resend of a few patches that implement few SVM's optional features for nesting. I was testing these patches during last few weeks with various nested configurations and I was unable to find any issues. I also implemented support for nested vGIF in the last patch. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky Maxim Levitsky (6): KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR virtualization KVM: x86: nSVM: correctly virtualize LBR msrs when L2 is running KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested LBR virtualization KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested VMLOAD/VMSAVE KVM: x86: nSVM: support PAUSE filter threshold and count when cpu_pm=on KVM: x86: SVM: implement nested vGIF arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++--- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 38 +++++++++-- 3 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) -- 2.26.3

3 years, 9 months

3
11
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next 0/6] tools/bpf: Enable cross-building with clang

by Jean-Philippe Brucker

Add support for cross-building BPF tools and selftests with clang, by passing LLVM=1 or CC=clang to make, as well as CROSS_COMPILE. A single clang toolchain can generate binaries for multiple architectures, so instead of having prefixes such as aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc, clang uses the -target parameter: `clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu'. Patch 1 adds the parameter in Makefile.include so tools can easily support this. Patch 2 prepares for the libbpf change from patch 3 (keep building resolve_btfids's libbpf in the host arch, when cross-building the kernel with clang). Patches 3-6 enable cross-building BPF tools with clang. Jean-Philippe Brucker (6): tools: Help cross-building with clang tools/resolve_btfids: Support cross-building the kernel with clang tools/libbpf: Enable cross-building with clang bpftool: Enable cross-building with clang tools/runqslower: Enable cross-building with clang selftests/bpf: Enable cross-building with clang tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile | 13 +++++++------ tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile | 1 + tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile | 4 ++-- tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 3 ++- tools/scripts/Makefile.include | 13 ++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 8 ++++---- 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.33.1

3 years, 9 months

4
11
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/3] selftests: tpm2: Probe for available PCR bank

by Stefan Berger

From: Stefan Berger <stefanb(a)linux.ibm.com> This series of patches fixes two issues with TPM2 selftest. - Probes for available PCR banks - Resets DA lock on TPM2 to avoid subsequent test failures It also extends the test cases with support for SHA-384 and SHA-512 PCR banks. Stefan v3: - Mention SHA-256 PCR bank as alternative in patch 1 description v2: - Clarified patch 1 description - Added patch 3 with support for SHA-384 and SHA-512 Stefan Berger (3): selftests: tpm2: Probe for available PCR bank selftests: tpm2: Reset the dictionary attack lock selftests: tpm2: Add support for SHA-384 and SHA-512 tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2.py | 12 ++++++- tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py | 37 +++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1

3 years, 9 months

3
6
0 0

[PATCH 0/4] KVM RISC-V 64-bit selftests support

by Anup Patel

This series adds initial support for testing KVM RISC-V 64-bit using kernel selftests framework. The PATCH1 & PATCH2 of this series does some ground work in KVM RISC-V to implement RISC-V support in the KVM selftests whereas remaining patches does required changes in the KVM selftests. These patches can be found in riscv_kvm_selftests_v1 branch at: https://github.com/avpatel/linux.git Anup Patel (4): RISC-V: KVM: Forward SBI experimental and vendor extensions RISC-V: KVM: Add VM capability to allow userspace get GPA size KVM: selftests: Add EXTRA_CFLAGS in top-level Makefile KVM: selftests: Add initial support for RISC-V 64-bit arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c | 5 + arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 4 + arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c | 27 ++ arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c | 3 + include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 14 +- .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 10 + .../selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h | 135 +++++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/guest_modes.c | 10 + .../selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c | 362 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c | 87 +++++ 12 files changed, 658 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/ucall.c -- 2.25.1

3 years, 9 months

3
10
0 0

kernel-selftests/kvm: kvm.tsc_msrs_test.fail

by Zhou, Jie2X

hi, When I do the kvm test in kernel v5.15 by "make run_tests -C tools/testing/selftests/kvm" get following error. # selftests: kvm: tsc_msrs_test # ==== Test Assertion Failure ==== # x86_64/tsc_msrs_test.c:88: false # pid=10432 tid=10432 errno=4 - Interrupted system call # 1 0x0000000000403168: run_vcpu at tsc_msrs_test.c:86 # 2 0x000000000040297a: main at tsc_msrs_test.c:150 # 3 0x00007f064f88509a: ?? ??:0 # 4 0x0000000000402a89: _start at ??:? # Failed guest assert: rounded_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC) == val at x86_64/tsc_msrs_test.c:63 # values: 0x1200000000, 0x400000000 The MSR_IA32_TSC register can not be set correctly in guest mode in some machine. But MSR_IA32_TSC register can be set correctly in host mode in that machine. Although there are two CPU mode machines both support following function. IA32_TSC_ADJUST MSR supported = true TSC: time stamp counter = true Test passed in cpu mode: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz Test failed in cpu mode: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6770HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz. Add print code to check MSR_IA32_TSC value. tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tsc_msrs_test.c @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ int main(void) val = 4ull * GUEST_STEP; - ASSERT_EQ(rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC), val); ASSERT_EQ(rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST), val - HOST_ADJUST); + printf("MSR_IA32_TSC: %llx, MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST: %llx, TSC_val: %llx, ADJUST_val: %llx\n\n", rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC), rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST), val, val - HOST_ADJUST); In test passed machine(i7-6700) set MSR_IA32_TSC to 0x400000000 and get 0x400000000. ./kvm/x86_64/tsc_msrs_test MSR_IA32_TSC: 400000000, MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST: fffffff400000000, TSC_val: 400000000, ADJUST_val: fffffff400000000 In test failed machine(i7-6770HQ) set MSR_IA32_TSC to 0x400000000 but get 0x1200000000. ./kvm/x86_64/tsc_msrs_test MSR_IA32_TSC: 1200000000, MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST: fffffff400000000, TSC_val: 400000000, ADJUST_val: fffffff400000000 Try to set MSR_IA32_TSC in host mode in test failed machine(i7-6770HQ). tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tsc_msrs_test.c @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ int main(void) val = 4ull * GUEST_STEP; + vcpu_set_msr(vm, 0, MSR_IA32_TSC, val); + vcpu_set_msr(vm, 0, MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST, val - HOST_ADJUST); ASSERT_EQ(rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC), val); ASSERT_EQ(rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST), val - HOST_ADJUST); + printf("MSR_IA32_TSC: %llx, MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST: %llx, TSC_val: %llx, ADJUST_val: %llx\n\n", rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC), rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST), val, val - HOST_ADJUST); The output show MSR_IA32_TSC value is set correctly. MSR_IA32_TSC: 400000000, MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST: fffffff400000000, TSC_val: 400000000, ADJUST_val: fffffff400000000 Why the MSR_IA32_TSC register can not be set correctly in guest mode in test failed machine(i7-6770HQ)? best regards,

3 years, 9 months

1
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror