- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

kselftest/fixes build: 8 builds: 0 failed, 8 passed (linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc3-4-ge8f0c8965932)

by kernelci.org bot

kselftest/fixes build: 8 builds: 0 failed, 8 passed (linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc3-4-ge8f0c8965932) Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/kselftest/branch/fixes/kernel/linux-kselftest-fi… Tree: kselftest Branch: fixes Git Describe: linux-kselftest-fixes-5.18-rc3-4-ge8f0c8965932 Git Commit: e8f0c89659323f3ddf60dcedcd56fe3ac36a37bf Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git Built: 4 unique architectures ================================================================================ Detailed per-defconfig build reports: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+kselftest (arm64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+kselftest (arm64, clang-14) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+kselftest+arm64-chromebook (arm64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+kselftest+arm64-chromebook (arm64, clang-14) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i386_defconfig+kselftest (i386, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest (arm, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig+kselftest (x86_64, gcc-10) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig+kselftest (x86_64, clang-14) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches --- For more info write to <info(a)kernelci.org>

3 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2 1/4] selftest/vm: verify mmap addr in mremap_test

by Sidhartha Kumar

Avoid calling mmap with requested addresses that are less than the system's mmap_min_addr. When run as root, mmap returns EACCES when trying to map addresses < mmap_min_addr. This is not one of the error codes for the condition to retry the mmap in the test. Rather than arbitrarily retrying on EACCES, don't attempt an mmap until addr > vm.mmap_min_addr. Add a munmap call after an alignment check as the mappings are retained after the retry and can reach the vm.max_map_count sysctl. Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar(a)oracle.com> --- v2: -change comment for description of get_mmap_min_addr() -fix commit message formatting tools/testing/selftests/vm/mremap_test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mremap_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mremap_test.c index 0624d1bd71b5..2b3b4f15185f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mremap_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/mremap_test.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include <errno.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <time.h> @@ -64,6 +65,35 @@ enum { .expect_failure = should_fail \ } +/* Returns mmap_min_addr sysctl tunable from procfs */ +static unsigned long long get_mmap_min_addr(void) +{ + FILE *fp; + int n_matched; + static unsigned long long addr; + + if (addr) + return addr; + + fp = fopen("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r"); + if (fp == NULL) { + ksft_print_msg("Failed to open /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr: %s\n", + strerror(errno)); + exit(KSFT_SKIP); + } + + n_matched = fscanf(fp, "%llu", &addr); + if (n_matched != 1) { + ksft_print_msg("Failed to read /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr: %s\n", + strerror(errno)); + fclose(fp); + exit(KSFT_SKIP); + } + + fclose(fp); + return addr; +} + /* * Returns the start address of the mapping on success, else returns * NULL on failure. @@ -72,8 +102,15 @@ static void *get_source_mapping(struct config c) { unsigned long long addr = 0ULL; void *src_addr = NULL; + unsigned long long mmap_min_addr; + + mmap_min_addr = get_mmap_min_addr(); + retry: addr += c.src_alignment; + if (addr < mmap_min_addr) + goto retry; + src_addr = mmap((void *) addr, c.region_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED, -1, 0); @@ -91,8 +128,10 @@ static void *get_source_mapping(struct config c) * alignment in the tests. */ if (((unsigned long long) src_addr & (c.src_alignment - 1)) || - !((unsigned long long) src_addr & c.src_alignment)) + !((unsigned long long) src_addr & c.src_alignment)) { + munmap(src_addr, c.region_size); goto retry; + } if (!src_addr) goto error; -- 2.27.0

3 years, 6 months

3
6
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach compilation error

by Artem Savkov

I am getting the following compilation error for prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach.c tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach.c: In function ‘test_uprobe_autoattach’: ./test_progs.h:209:26: error: pointer ‘mem’ may be used after ‘free’ [-Werror=use-after-free] mem variable is now used in one of the asserts so it shouldn't be freed right away. Move free(mem) after the assert block. Fixes: 1717e248014c ("selftests/bpf: Uprobe tests should verify param/return values") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov(a)redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach.c index d6003dc8cc99..35b87c7ba5be 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_autoattach.c @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ void test_uprobe_autoattach(void) /* trigger & validate shared library u[ret]probes attached by name */ mem = malloc(malloc_sz); - free(mem); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_byname_parm1, trigger_val, "check_uprobe_byname_parm1"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_byname_ran, 1, "check_uprobe_byname_ran"); @@ -44,6 +43,8 @@ void test_uprobe_autoattach(void) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_byname2_ran, 3, "check_uprobe_byname2_ran"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uretprobe_byname2_rc, mem, "check_uretprobe_byname2_rc"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uretprobe_byname2_ran, 4, "check_uretprobe_byname2_ran"); + + free(mem); cleanup: test_uprobe_autoattach__destroy(skel); } -- 2.35.1

3 years, 6 months

4
5
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix map tests errno checks

by Artem Savkov

Switching to libbpf 1.0 API broke test_lpm_map and test_lru_map as error reporting changed. Instead of setting errno and returning -1 bpf calls now return -Exxx directly. Drop errno checks and look at return code directly. Fixes: b858ba8c52b6 ("selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov(a)redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 39 +++++-------- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c | 66 ++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c index 789c9748d241..c028d621c744 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c @@ -408,16 +408,13 @@ static void test_lpm_ipaddr(void) /* Test some lookups that should not match any entry */ inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key_ipv4->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT); inet_pton(AF_INET, "11.11.11.11", key_ipv4->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT); inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:ffff::", key_ipv6->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -ENOENT); close(map_fd_ipv4); close(map_fd_ipv6); @@ -474,18 +471,15 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void) /* remove non-existent node */ key->prefixlen = 32; inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT); key->prefixlen = 30; // unused prefix so far inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT); key->prefixlen = 16; // same prefix as the root node inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT); /* assert initial lookup */ key->prefixlen = 32; @@ -530,8 +524,7 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void) key->prefixlen = 32; inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.1", key->data); - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT); close(map_fd); } @@ -552,8 +545,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) assert(map_fd >= 0); /* empty tree. get_next_key should return ENOENT */ - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -ENOENT); /* get and verify the first key, get the second one should fail. */ key_p->prefixlen = 16; @@ -565,8 +557,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) assert(key_p->prefixlen == 16 && key_p->data[0] == 192 && key_p->data[1] == 168); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* no exact matching key should get the first one in post order. */ key_p->prefixlen = 8; @@ -590,8 +581,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168); memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* Add one more element (total three) */ key_p->prefixlen = 24; @@ -614,8 +604,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168); memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* Add one more element (total four) */ key_p->prefixlen = 24; @@ -643,8 +632,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168); memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* Add one more element (total five) */ key_p->prefixlen = 28; @@ -678,8 +666,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void) next_key_p->data[1] == 168); memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size); - assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT); /* no exact matching key should return the first one in post order */ key_p->prefixlen = 22; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c index a6aa2d121955..4d0650cfb5cd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c @@ -175,24 +175,20 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags) BPF_NOEXIST)); /* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1 - /* key=1 already exists */ - && errno == EEXIST); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST); + /* key=1 already exists */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, -1) == -1 && - errno == EINVAL); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, -1) == -EINVAL); /* insert key=2 element */ /* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 && - /* key=2 is not there */ - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT); + /* key=2 is not there */ assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); @@ -200,8 +196,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags) /* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* check that key=1 can be found and mark the ref bit to * stop LRU from removing key=1 @@ -217,8 +212,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity0(int map_type, int map_flags) /* key=2 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* lookup elem key=1 and delete it, then check it doesn't exist */ key = 1; @@ -381,8 +375,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity2(int map_type, int map_flags, unsigned int tgt_free) end_key = 1 + batch_size; value[0] = 4321; for (key = 1; key < end_key; key++) { - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); assert(!bpf_map_lookup_elem_with_ref_bit(lru_map_fd, key, value)); @@ -562,8 +555,7 @@ static void do_test_lru_sanity5(unsigned long long last_key, int map_fd) assert(!bpf_map_lookup_elem_with_ref_bit(map_fd, key, value)); /* Cannot find the last key because it was removed by LRU */ - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &last_key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &last_key, value) == -ENOENT); } /* Test map with only one element */ @@ -711,21 +703,18 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags) BPF_NOEXIST)); /* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1 - /* key=1 already exists */ - && errno == EEXIST); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST); + /* key=1 already exists */ /* insert key=2 element */ /* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 && - /* key=2 is not there */ - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT); + /* key=2 is not there */ assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); @@ -733,8 +722,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags) /* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* check that key=1 can be found and mark the ref bit to * stop LRU from removing key=1 @@ -757,8 +745,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity7(int map_type, int map_flags) /* key=2 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); assert(map_equal(lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd)); @@ -805,21 +792,18 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags) assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); /* BPF_NOEXIST means: add new element if it doesn't exist */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1 - /* key=1 already exists */ - && errno == EEXIST); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) == -EEXIST); + /* key=1 already exists */ /* insert key=2 element */ /* check that key=2 is not found */ key = 2; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* BPF_EXIST means: update existing element */ - assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -1 && - /* key=2 is not there */ - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_EXIST) == -ENOENT); + /* key=2 is not there */ assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value, BPF_NOEXIST)); assert(!bpf_map_update_elem(expected_map_fd, &key, value, @@ -829,8 +813,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags) /* check that key=3 is not found */ key = 3; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); /* check that key=1 can be found and do _not_ mark ref bit. * this will be evicted on next update. @@ -853,8 +836,7 @@ static void test_lru_sanity8(int map_type, int map_flags) /* key=1 has been removed from the LRU */ key = 1; - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -1 && - errno == ENOENT); + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(lru_map_fd, &key, value) == -ENOENT); assert(map_equal(lru_map_fd, expected_map_fd)); -- 2.35.1

3 years, 6 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix attach tests retcode checks

by Artem Savkov

Switching to libbpf 1.0 API broke test_sock and test_sysctl as they check for return of bpf_prog_attach to be exactly -1. Switch the check to '< 0' instead. Fixes: b858ba8c52b6 ("selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov(a)redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c index 6c4494076bbf..810c3740b2cc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int run_test_case(int cgfd, const struct sock_test *test) goto err; } - if (attach_sock_prog(cgfd, progfd, test->attach_type) == -1) { + if (attach_sock_prog(cgfd, progfd, test->attach_type) < 0) { if (test->result == ATTACH_REJECT) goto out; else diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c index 5bae25ca19fb..57620e7c9048 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c @@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ static int run_test_case(int cgfd, struct sysctl_test *test) goto err; } - if (bpf_prog_attach(progfd, cgfd, atype, BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE) == -1) { + if (bpf_prog_attach(progfd, cgfd, atype, BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE) < 0) { if (test->result == ATTACH_REJECT) goto out; else -- 2.35.1

3 years, 6 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: alsa: Start validating control names

by Mark Brown

Not much of a test but we keep on getting problems with boolean controls not being called Switches so let's add a few basic checks to help people spot problems. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c index eb2213540fe3..b747dbc023ab 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #include "../kselftest.h" -#define TESTS_PER_CONTROL 6 +#define TESTS_PER_CONTROL 7 struct card_data { snd_ctl_t *handle; @@ -456,6 +456,44 @@ static void test_ctl_get_value(struct ctl_data *ctl) ctl->card->card, ctl->elem); } +bool strend(const char *haystack, const char *needle) +{ + size_t haystack_len = strlen(haystack); + size_t needle_len = strlen(needle); + + if (needle_len > haystack_len) + return false; + return strcmp(haystack + haystack_len - needle_len, needle) == 0; +} + +static void test_ctl_name(struct ctl_data *ctl) +{ + bool name_ok = true; + bool check; + + /* Only boolean controls should end in Switch */ + if (strend(ctl->name, "Switch")) { + if (snd_ctl_elem_info_get_type(ctl->info) != SND_CTL_ELEM_TYPE_BOOLEAN) { + ksft_print_msg("%d.%d %s ends in Switch but is not boolean\n", + ctl->card->card, ctl->elem, ctl->name); + name_ok = false; + } + } + + /* Writeable boolean controls should end in Switch */ + if (snd_ctl_elem_info_get_type(ctl->info) == SND_CTL_ELEM_TYPE_BOOLEAN && + snd_ctl_elem_info_is_writable(ctl->info)) { + if (!strend(ctl->name, "Switch")) { + ksft_print_msg("%d.%d %s is a writeable boolean but not a Switch\n", + ctl->card->card, ctl->elem, ctl->name); + name_ok = false; + } + } + + ksft_test_result(name_ok, "name.%d.%d\n", + ctl->card->card, ctl->elem); +} + static bool show_mismatch(struct ctl_data *ctl, int index, snd_ctl_elem_value_t *read_val, snd_ctl_elem_value_t *expected_val) @@ -1062,6 +1100,7 @@ int main(void) * test stores the default value for later cleanup. */ test_ctl_get_value(ctl); + test_ctl_name(ctl); test_ctl_write_default(ctl); test_ctl_write_valid(ctl); test_ctl_write_invalid(ctl); -- 2.30.2

3 years, 6 months

2
2
0 0

Napływ Klientów ze strony

by "Mikołaj Rudzik"

Dzień dobry, chciałbym poinformować Państwa o możliwości pozyskania nowych zleceń ze strony www. Widzimy zainteresowanie potencjalnych Klientów Państwa firmą, dlatego chętnie pomożemy Państwu dotrzeć z ofertą do większego grona odbiorców poprzez efektywne metody pozycjonowania strony w Google. Czy mógłbym liczyć na kontakt zwrotny? Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Mikołaj Rudzik

3 years, 6 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/4] memcg: introduce per-memcg proactive reclaim

by Yosry Ahmed

This patch series adds a memory.reclaim proactive reclaim interface. The rationale behind the interface and how it works are in the first patch. --- Changes in V3: - Fix cg_write() (in patch 2) to properly return -1 if open() fails and not fail if len == errno. - Remove debug printf() in patch 3. Changes in V2: - Add the interface to root as well. - Added a selftest. - Documented the interface as a nested-keyed interface, which makes adding optional arguments in the future easier (see doc updates in the first patch). - Modified the commit message to reflect changes and add a timeout argument as a suggested possible extension - Return -EAGAIN if the kernel fails to reclaim the full requested amount. --- Shakeel Butt (1): memcg: introduce per-memcg reclaim interface Yosry Ahmed (3): selftests: cgroup: return the errno of write() in cg_write() on failure selftests: cgroup: fix alloc_anon_noexit() instantly freeing memory selftests: cgroup: add a selftest for memory.reclaim Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 21 +++++ mm/memcontrol.c | 37 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c | 32 ++++--- .../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) -- 2.35.1.1178.g4f1659d476-goog

3 years, 6 months

4
19
0 0

[PATCH] KVM: selftests: Silence compiler warning in the kvm_page_table_test

by Thomas Huth

When compiling kvm_page_table_test.c, I get this compiler warning with gcc 11.2: kvm_page_table_test.c: In function 'pre_init_before_test': ../../../../tools/include/linux/kernel.h:44:24: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast 44 | (void) (&_max1 == &_max2); \ | ^~ kvm_page_table_test.c:281:21: note: in expansion of macro 'max' 281 | alignment = max(0x100000, alignment); | ^~~ Fix it by adjusting the type of the absolute value. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c index ba1fdc3dcf4a..2c4a7563a4f8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *pre_init_before_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg) else guest_test_phys_mem = p->phys_offset; #ifdef __s390x__ - alignment = max(0x100000, alignment); + alignment = max(0x100000UL, alignment); #endif guest_test_phys_mem = align_down(guest_test_phys_mem, alignment); -- 2.27.0

3 years, 6 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH 0/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Provide TAP output in tests

by Thomas Huth

This patch series is motivated by Shuah's suggestion here: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/d576d8f7-980f-3bc6-87ad-5a6ae45609b8@linuxfound… Many s390x KVM selftests do not output any information about which tests have been run, so it's hard to say whether a test binary contains a certain sub-test or not. To improve this situation let's add some TAP output via the kselftest.h interface to these tests, so that it easier to understand what has been executed or not. Thomas Huth (4): KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the memop test KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the sync_regs test KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the tprot test KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the reset test tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 90 +++++++++++++++---- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/resets.c | 38 ++++++-- .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 86 +++++++++++++----- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c | 12 ++- 4 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) -- 2.27.0

3 years, 6 months

3
13
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror