This patchset adds support for SRv6 Headend behavior with Reduced
Encapsulation. It introduces the H.Encaps.Red and H.L2Encaps.Red versions
of the SRv6 H.Encaps and H.L2Encaps behaviors, according to RFC 8986 [1].
In details, the patchset is made of:
- patch 1/4: add support for SRv6 H.Encaps.Red behavior;
- Patch 2/4: add support for SRv6 H.L2Encaps.Red behavior;
- patch 2/4: add selftest for SRv6 H.Encaps.Red behavior;
- patch 3/4: add selftest for SRv6 H.L2Encaps.Red behavior.
The corresponding iproute2 patch for supporting SRv6 H.Encaps.Red and
H.L2Encaps.Red behaviors is provided in a separated patchset.
[1] - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8986
v2 -> v3:
- Keep SRH when HMAC TLV is present;
- Split the support for H.Encaps.Red and H.L2Encaps.Red behaviors in two
patches (respectively, patch 1/4 and patch 2/4);
- Add selftests for SRv6 H.Encaps.Red and H.L2Encaps.Red.
v1 -> v2:
- Fixed sparse warnings;
- memset now uses sizeof() instead of hardcoded value;
- Removed EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
Andrea Mayer (4):
seg6: add support for SRv6 H.Encaps.Red behavior
seg6: add support for SRv6 H.L2Encaps.Red behavior
selftests: seg6: add selftest for SRv6 H.Encaps.Red behavior
selftests: seg6: add selftest for SRv6 H.L2Encaps.Red behavior
include/uapi/linux/seg6_iptunnel.h | 2 +
net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c | 138 +++-
.../net/srv6_hencap_red_l3vpn_test.sh | 742 ++++++++++++++++++
.../net/srv6_hl2encap_red_l2vpn_test.sh | 674 ++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 1554 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_hencap_red_l3vpn_test.sh
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_hl2encap_red_l2vpn_test.sh
--
2.20.1
From: Johannes Holland <johannes.holland(a)infineon.com>
Due to CreatePrimary commands which need to create RSA keys of
increasing size, the timeout value need to be raised, as well.
Default is 45s.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Holland <johannes.holland(a)infineon.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann <stefan.mahnke-hartmann(a)infineon.com>
---
Changelog:
* v2:
* Add maintainter to recipients
* Change subject
tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/settings | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/settings
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/settings b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/settings
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..919bc3803f03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/settings
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+timeout=600
+
--
2.25.1
Fix Sphinx complaints about code-block directive missing an argument.
For start.rst, add "none" since that is already heavily used in that
file. For run_wrapper.rst, use the simpler "::" literal block instead.
dev-tools/kunit/start.rst:83: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:17: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:23: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:31: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:51: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:57: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:78: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:85: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:109: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:116: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:124: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:139: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:162: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
Fixes: c48b9ef1f794 ("Documentation: KUnit: Rewrite getting started")
Fixes: 46201d47d6c4 ("Documentation: kunit: Reorganize documentation related to running tests")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap(a)infradead.org>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: kunit-dev(a)googlegroups.com
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet(a)lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: Harinder Singh <sharinder(a)google.com>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird(a)sony.com>
---
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst | 24 ++++++++--------
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 2 -
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- linux-next-20220331.orig/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
+++ linux-next-20220331/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ tests, and formats the test results.
Run command:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
We should see the following:
-.. code-block::
+::
Generating .config...
Building KUnit kernel...
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ We should see the following:
We may want to use the following options:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=30 --jobs=`nproc --all
@@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ test configs for certain subsystems.
To use a different ``.kunitconfig`` file (such as one
provided to test a particular subsystem), pass it as an option:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4/.kunitconfig
To view kunit_tool flags (optional command-line arguments), run:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --help
@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ certain code blocks, arch configs and so
To create a ``.kunitconfig``, using the KUnit ``defconfig``:
-.. code-block::
+::
cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO
cp tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config .kunit/.kunitconfig
We can then add any other Kconfig options. For example:
-.. code-block::
+::
CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
@@ -106,14 +106,14 @@ can run part of the KUnit build process
When running kunit_tool, from a ``.kunitconfig``, we can generate a
``.config`` by using the ``config`` argument:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
To build a KUnit kernel from the current ``.config``, we can use the
``build`` argument:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ If we already have built UML kernel with
can run the kernel, and display the test results with the ``exec``
argument:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ format. When running tests, kunit_tool p
a summary. To see the raw test results in TAP format, we can pass the
``--raw_output`` argument:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ By passing a bash style glob filter to t
commands, we can run a subset of the tests built into a kernel . For
example: if we only want to run KUnit resource tests, use:
-.. code-block::
+::
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'kunit-resource*'
--- linux-next-20220331.orig/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
+++ linux-next-20220331/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Running Tests (KUnit Wrapper)
If everything worked correctly, you should see the following:
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
Generating .config ...
Building KUnit Kernel ...
Hello,
My name is Steve Dibenedetto.
I apologize to have contacted you this way without a direct relationship. There is an opportunity to collaborate with me in the sourcing of some materials needed by our company for production of the different medicines we are researching.
I'm aware that this might be totally outside your professional specialization, but it will be a great source for generating extra revenue. I discovered a manufacturer who can supply us at a lower rate than our company's previous purchases.
I will give you more specific details when/if I receive feedback from you showing interest.
Warm Regards
Steve Dibenedetto
Production & Control Manager,
Green Field Laboratories
Gothic House, Barker Gate,
Nottingham, NG1 1JU,
United Kingdom.