- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH] kselftest/arm64: fix array_size.cocci warning

by wangkailong＠jari.cn

Fix following coccicheck warning: tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:64:24-25: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:66:20-21: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:135:25-26: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:96:25-26: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:190:24-25: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE Signed-off-by: KaiLong Wang <wangkailong(a)jari.cn> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c index a04b12c21ac9..17694caaff53 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c @@ -61,9 +61,8 @@ static int check_anonymous_memory_mapping(int mem_type, int mode, int mapping, i { char *ptr, *map_ptr; int run, result, map_size; - int item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + int item = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); - item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); for (run = 0; run < item; run++) { map_size = sizes[run] + OVERFLOW + UNDERFLOW; @@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ static int check_file_memory_mapping(int mem_type, int mode, int mapping, int ta { char *ptr, *map_ptr; int run, fd, map_size; - int total = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + int total = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); int result = KSFT_PASS; mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); @@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ static int check_clear_prot_mte_flag(int mem_type, int mode, int mapping) { char *ptr, *map_ptr; int run, prot_flag, result, fd, map_size; - int total = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + int total = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); prot_flag = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE; mte_switch_mode(mode, MTE_ALLOW_NON_ZERO_TAG); @@ -187,7 +186,7 @@ static int check_clear_prot_mte_flag(int mem_type, int mode, int mapping) int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int err; - int item = sizeof(sizes)/sizeof(int); + int item = ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); err = mte_default_setup(); if (err) -- 2.25.1

2 years, 7 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/ftrace: event_triggers: wait longer for test_event_enable

by Yipeng Zou

In some platform, the schedule event may came slowly, delay 100ms can't cover it. I was notice that on my board which running in low cpu_freq,and this selftests allways gose fail. So maybe we can check more times here to wait longer. Fixes: 43bb45da82f9 ("selftests: ftrace: Add a selftest to test event enable/disable func trigger") Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng(a)huawei.com> --- .../ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_event_triggers.tc | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_event_triggers.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_event_triggers.tc index 8d26d5505808..3eea2abf68f9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_event_triggers.tc +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_event_triggers.tc @@ -38,11 +38,18 @@ cnt_trace() { test_event_enabled() { val=$1 + check_times=10 # wait for 10 * SLEEP_TIME at most - e=`cat $EVENT_ENABLE` - if [ "$e" != $val ]; then - fail "Expected $val but found $e" - fi + while [ $check_times -ne 0 ]; do + e=`cat $EVENT_ENABLE` + if [ "$e" == $val ]; then + return 0 + fi + sleep $SLEEP_TIME + check_times=$((check_times - 1)) + done + + fail "Expected $val but found $e" } run_enable_disable() { -- 2.17.1

2 years, 7 months

4
3
0 0

KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Hi, I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. The DRM subsystem and the i915 driver has, for a long time, his own way to do unit tests, which seems to be added before KUnit. I'm now checking if it is worth start using KUnit at i915. So, I wrote a RFC with some patches adding support for the tests we have to be reported using Kernel TAP and KUnit. There are basically 3 groups of tests there: - mock tests - check i915 hardware-independent logic; - live tests - run some hardware-specific tests; - perf tests - check perf support - also hardware-dependent. As they depend on i915 driver, they run only on x86, with PCI stack enabled, but the mock tests run nicely via qemu. The live and perf tests require a real hardware. As we run them together with our CI, which, among other things, test module unload/reload and test loading i915 driver with different modprobe parameters, the KUnit tests should be able to run as a module. While testing KUnit, I noticed a couple of issues: 1. kunit.py parser is currently broken when used with modules the parser expects "TAP version xx" output, but this won't happen when loading the kunit test driver. Are there any plans or patches fixing this issue? 2. current->mm is not initialized Some tests do mmap(). They need the mm user context to be initialized, but this is not happening right now. Are there a way to properly initialize it for KUnit? 3. there's no test filters for modules In order to be able to do proper CI automation, it is needed to be able to control what tests will run or not. That's specially interesting at development time where some tests may not apply or not run properly on new hardware. Are there any plans to add support for it at kunit_test_suites() when the driver is built as module? Ideally, the best would be to export a per-module filter_glob parameter on such cases. 4. there are actually 3 levels of tests on i915: - Level 1: mock, live, perf - Level 2: test group (mmap, fences, ...) - Level 3: unit tests Currently, KUnit seems to have just two levels (test suite and tests). Are there a way to add test groups there? Regards, Mauro Forwarded message: Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 14:51:38 +0000 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab(a)kernel.org> To: Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom(a)linux.intel.com>, linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org, Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski(a)intel.com>, dri-devel(a)lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com>, linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org, igt-dev(a)lists.freedesktop.org, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld(a)intel.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel(a)ffwll.ch>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi(a)intel.com>, skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org, Isabella Basso <isabbasso(a)riseup.net>, David Airlie <airlied(a)gmail.com>, Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL The mmap tests require mm in order to work. Failing to do that will cause a crash: [ 316.820722] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000e8 [ 316.822517] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 316.823430] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 316.824390] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 316.825357] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 316.826350] CPU: 0 PID: 1517 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G U N 6.1.0-rc2-drm-266703e6f163+ #14 [ 316.827503] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake Y LPDDR4x T4 Crb, BIOS TGLSFWI1.R00.3243.A01.2006102133 06/10/2020 [ 316.828633] RIP: 0010:down_write_killable+0x50/0x110 [ 316.829756] Code: 24 10 45 31 c9 31 c9 41 b8 01 00 00 00 31 d2 31 f6 48 89 ef e8 e1 74 4a ff bf 01 00 00 00 e8 87 d6 46 ff 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 48 0f b1 13 0f 94 c0 5a 84 c0 74 62 8b 05 49 12 e4 00 85 c0 74 [ 316.830896] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001eabc58 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 316.832008] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000000e8 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 316.833141] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff81c94fc9 RDI: ffffffff81c94fc9 [ 316.834195] RBP: 0000000000000158 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 316.835231] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8883a13350b8 R12: 0000000000000002 [ 316.836259] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000100000 R15: 00000000000000e8 [ 316.837237] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8883a3800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 316.838214] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 316.839190] CR2: 00000000000000e8 CR3: 0000000002812003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 316.840147] PKRU: 55555554 [ 316.841099] Call Trace: [ 316.842047] <TASK> [ 316.842990] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x78/0x150 [ 316.843936] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x78/0x150 [ 316.844884] igt_mmap_offset+0x178/0x1b9 [i915] [ 316.846119] __igt_mmap+0xfe/0x680 [i915] Unfortunately, when KUnit module runs, it doesn't create an user context, causing mmap tests to fail. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab(a)kernel.org> --- To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover. See [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667486144.git.mchehab@kernel.org/ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c index add5ae56cd89..2c5f93e946b5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c @@ -1845,6 +1845,11 @@ int i915_gem_mman_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915) SUBTEST(igt_mmap_gpu), }; + if (!current->mm) { + pr_err("Test called without an user context!\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + return i915_live_subtests(tests, i915); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(i915_gem_mman_live_selftests, I915_SELFTEST); -- 2.38.1

2 years, 7 months

4
9
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/damon: Fix unnecessary compilation warnings

by Rong Tao

From: Rong Tao <rongtao(a)cestc.cn> When testing overflow and overread, there is no need to keep unnecessary compilation warnings, we should simply ignore them. How to reproduce the problem: $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/ gcc huge_count_read_write.c -o /home/sd/Git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write huge_count_read_write.c: In function ‘write_read_with_huge_count’: huge_count_read_write.c:23:9: warning: ‘write’ reading 4294967295 bytes from a region of size 1 [-Wstringop-overread] 23 | write(filedesc, "", 0xfffffffful); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from huge_count_read_write.c:8: /usr/include/unistd.h:378:16: note: in a call to function ‘write’ declared with attribute ‘access (read_only, 2, 3)’ 378 | extern ssize_t write (int __fd, const void *__buf, size_t __n) __wur | ^~~~~ huge_count_read_write.c:25:15: warning: ‘read’ writing 4294967295 bytes into a region of size 25 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=] 25 | ret = read(filedesc, buf, 0xfffffffful); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ huge_count_read_write.c:14:14: note: destination object ‘buf’ of size 25 14 | char buf[25]; | ^~~ In file included from huge_count_read_write.c:8: /usr/include/unistd.h:371:16: note: in a call to function ‘read’ declared with attribute ‘access (write_only, 2, 3)’ 371 | extern ssize_t read (int __fd, void *__buf, size_t __nbytes) __wur | ^~~~ Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao(a)cestc.cn> --- tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c index ad7a6b4cf338..8fbe276870e7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/huge_count_read_write.c @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push +/* Ignore read(2) overflow and write(2) overread compile warnings */ +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overread" +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow" + void write_read_with_huge_count(char *file) { int filedesc = open(file, O_RDWR); @@ -27,6 +32,8 @@ void write_read_with_huge_count(char *file) close(filedesc); } +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop + int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if (argc != 2) { -- 2.31.1

2 years, 7 months

2
7
0 0

[PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Build access_tracking_perf_test for arm64

by Oliver Upton

Does exactly what it says on the tin. Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton(a)linux.dev> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index 0172eb6cb6ee..4c0ff91a8964 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/psci_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vcpu_width_config TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_init TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_irq +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_perf_test -- 2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog

2 years, 7 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH bpf v2] selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_synproxy compilation failure in 32-bit arch

by Yang Jihong

xdp_synproxy fails to be compiled in the 32-bit arch, log is as follows: xdp_synproxy.c: In function 'parse_options': xdp_synproxy.c:175:36: error: left shift count >= width of type [-Werror=shift-count-overflow] 175 | *tcpipopts = (mss6 << 32) | (ttl << 24) | (wscale << 16) | mss4; | ^~ xdp_synproxy.c: In function 'syncookie_open_bpf_maps': xdp_synproxy.c:289:28: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Werror=pointer-to-int-cast] 289 | .map_ids = (__u64)map_ids, | ^ Fix it. Fixes: fb5cd0ce70d4 ("selftests/bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers") Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1(a)huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_synproxy.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_synproxy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_synproxy.c index ff35320d2be9..410a1385a01d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_synproxy.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_synproxy.c @@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ static void parse_options(int argc, char *argv[], unsigned int *ifindex, __u32 * { "tc", no_argument, NULL, 'c' }, { NULL, 0, NULL, 0 }, }; - unsigned long mss4, mss6, wscale, ttl; + unsigned long mss4, wscale, ttl; + unsigned long long mss6; unsigned int tcpipopts_mask = 0; if (argc < 2) @@ -286,7 +287,7 @@ static int syncookie_open_bpf_maps(__u32 prog_id, int *values_map_fd, int *ports prog_info = (struct bpf_prog_info) { .nr_map_ids = 8, - .map_ids = (__u64)map_ids, + .map_ids = (__u64)(unsigned long)map_ids, }; info_len = sizeof(prog_info); -- 2.30.GIT

2 years, 7 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH bpf v2 0/2] Fix offset when fault occurs in strncpy_from_kernel_nofault()

by Alban Crequy

Hi, This is v2 of the fix & selftest previously sent at: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221108195211.214025-1-flaniel@linux.micr… Changes v1 to v2: - add 'cc:stable', 'Fixes:' and review/ack tags - update commitmsg and fix my email - rebase on bpf tree and tag for bpf tree Thanks! Alban Crequy (2): maccess: fix writing offset in case of fault in strncpy_from_kernel_nofault() selftests: bpf: add a test when bpf_probe_read_kernel_str() returns EFAULT mm/maccess.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c | 7 +++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.36.1

2 years, 7 months

2
3
0 0

[PATCH 0/7] KUnit documentation rewording

by Bagas Sanjaya

The proses written in KUnit documentation are IMO incomprehensible (my brain has to process what the meaning of words used) and different from wordings that I normally read from technical writings. Thus, rewrite these using clearer words. Anyway, it's great to see native English speakers help reviewing this series. The first two patches are v3 of rewriting "Writing Your First Test" section of "Getting Started" patch [1], which was submitted about a month ago. The rest are actual documentation rewriting. Note that this series only rewrites intro, test writing and running docs. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220929132549.56452-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/ Bagas Sanjaya (7): Documentation: kunit: rewrite "Writing Your First Test" section Documentation: kunit: align instruction code blocks Documentation: kunit: rewrite the rest of "Getting Started" documentation Documentation: kunit: move introduction to its own document Documentation: kunit: rewrite "Running tests with kunit_tool" Documentation: kunit: rewrite "Run Tests without kunit_tool" Documentation: kunit: rewrite "Writing tests" Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst | 2 + Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 93 +---- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/intro.rst | 61 ++++ Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst | 68 ++-- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst | 302 ++++++---------- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 264 +++++++------- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 322 ++++++++++-------- 7 files changed, 483 insertions(+), 629 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/intro.rst base-commit: de3ee3f63400a23954e7c1ad1cb8c20f29ab6fe3 -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

2 years, 7 months

2
10
0 0

Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL to get and/or the clear info about PTEs

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

I've fixed these build failure for the next patch iteration. Please comment and review on the patch. I'll wait for a few days before sending next version. On 11/11/22 10:13 PM, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Muhammad, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on next-20221109] > [also build test ERROR on v6.1-rc4] > [cannot apply to shuah-kselftest/next shuah-kselftest/fixes linus/master v6.1-rc4 v6.1-rc3 v6.1-rc2] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Muhammad-Usama-Anjum/Impleme… > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109102303.851281-3-usama.anjum%40collabora.c… > patch subject: [PATCH v6 2/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL to get and/or the clear info about PTEs > config: arm-buildonly-randconfig-r006-20221111 > compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 463da45892e2d2a262277b91b96f5f8c05dc25d0) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build > # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/b329378abd03a741ff7250ec1b602… > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Muhammad-Usama-Anjum/Implement-IOCTL-to-get-and-or-the-clear-info-about-PTEs/20221109-182618 > git checkout b329378abd03a741ff7250ec1b60292c893476da > # save the config file > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash fs/ > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:1882:41: error: use of undeclared identifier 'HPAGE_SIZE' > if ((IS_CLEAR_OP(p) && (end - addr < HPAGE_SIZE))) { > ^ > 1 error generated. > > > vim +/HPAGE_SIZE +1882 fs/proc/task_mmu.c > > 1856 > 1857 static int pagemap_scan_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, > 1858 unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk) > 1859 { > 1860 struct pagemap_scan_private *p = walk->private; > 1861 struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma; > 1862 unsigned int len; > 1863 spinlock_t *ptl; > 1864 int ret = 0; > 1865 pte_t *pte; > 1866 bool dirty_vma = (p->flags & PAGEMAP_NO_REUSED_REGIONS) ? > 1867 (false) : (vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY); > 1868 > 1869 if ((walk->vma->vm_end < addr) || (p->max_pages && p->found_pages == p->max_pages)) > 1870 return 0; > 1871 > 1872 end = min(end, walk->vma->vm_end); > 1873 > 1874 ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma); > 1875 if (ptl) { > 1876 if (dirty_vma || check_soft_dirty_pmd(vma, addr, pmd, false)) { > 1877 /* > 1878 * Break huge page into small pages if operation needs to be performed is > 1879 * on a portion of the huge page or the return buffer cannot store complete > 1880 * data. > 1881 */ >> 1882 if ((IS_CLEAR_OP(p) && (end - addr < HPAGE_SIZE))) { > 1883 spin_unlock(ptl); > 1884 split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr); > 1885 goto process_smaller_pages; > 1886 } > 1887 > 1888 if (IS_GET_OP(p)) { > 1889 len = (end - addr)/PAGE_SIZE; > 1890 if (p->max_pages && p->found_pages + len > p->max_pages) > 1891 len = p->max_pages - p->found_pages; > 1892 > 1893 ret = add_to_out(dirty_vma || > 1894 check_soft_dirty_pmd(vma, addr, pmd, false), > 1895 vma->vm_file, pmd_present(*pmd), is_swap_pmd(*pmd), > 1896 p, addr, len); > 1897 } > 1898 if (!ret && IS_CLEAR_OP(p)) > 1899 check_soft_dirty_pmd(vma, addr, pmd, true); > 1900 } > 1901 spin_unlock(ptl); > 1902 return 0; > 1903 } > 1904 > 1905 process_smaller_pages: > 1906 if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd)) > 1907 return 0; > 1908 > 1909 pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); > 1910 for (; addr < end && !ret && (!p->max_pages || (p->found_pages < p->max_pages)) > 1911 ; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) { > 1912 if (IS_GET_OP(p)) > 1913 ret = add_to_out(dirty_vma || check_soft_dirty(vma, addr, pte, false), > 1914 vma->vm_file, pte_present(*pte), > 1915 is_swap_pte(*pte), p, addr, 1); > 1916 if (!ret && IS_CLEAR_OP(p)) > 1917 check_soft_dirty(vma, addr, pte, true); > 1918 } > 1919 pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl); > 1920 cond_resched(); > 1921 > 1922 return 0; > 1923 } > 1924 > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum

2 years, 7 months

1
0
0 0

[RESEND PATCH v6] x86/fpu: Trying to fix writing PKRU through ptrace

by Kyle Huey

Hello Linus, I've been trying since July to get this regression that was introduced in 5.14 fixed. This is my third time submitting this version of the patch in the last two months. Both prior submissions have not received any comments from (nor have they been applied by) the x86 maintainers. I don't really know what else to do at this point beyond "complain to the management" as it were. I appreciate anything you can do to unjam things here. - Kyle

2 years, 7 months

4
10
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror