- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH v2] selftests: sched: Add more core schedule prctl calls

by Ivan Orlov

The core sched kselftest makes prctl calls only with correct parameters. This patch will extend this test with more core schedule prctl calls with wrong parameters to increase code coverage. Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322(a)gmail.com> --- V1 -> V2: Unnecessary printing removed - 'validate' will automatically print the message in case or error tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c index 25e0d95d3713..3e1619b6bf2d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c @@ -334,6 +334,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) != 0); validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) == get_cs_cookie(procs[pidx].thr_tids[0])); + validate(_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_MAX, 0, PIDTYPE_PGID, 0) < 0 + && errno == EINVAL); + + validate(_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, 0, PIDTYPE_PGID, 1) < 0 + && errno == EINVAL); + if (errors) { printf("TESTS FAILED. errors: %d\n", errors); res = 10; -- 2.34.1

2 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] tools/nolibc: tests: use volatile to force stack smashing

by Thomas Weißschuh

Use a volatile pointer to write outside the buffer so the compiler can't optimize it away. Reported-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan(a)gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c0584807-511c-4496-b062-1263ea38f349@p183/ Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net> --- This is based on the "dev" branch of the rcu tree. --- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 21bacc928bf7..47013b78972e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -667,17 +667,13 @@ int run_stdlib(int min, int max) return ret; } -#if defined(__clang__) -__attribute__((optnone)) -#elif defined(__GNUC__) -__attribute__((optimize("O0"))) -#endif static int smash_stack(void) { char buf[100]; + volatile char *ptr = buf; for (size_t i = 0; i < 200; i++) - buf[i] = 'P'; + ptr[i] = 'P'; return 1; } --- base-commit: 6e7cac3d5b8c77ddedfaa7efad23aa542cde53b2 change-id: 20230328-nolibc-smash-stack-volatile-0e87e9273fea Best regards, -- Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

new kunit infrastructure

by Johannes Berg

Hi all, Is there an established process for new kunit infrastructure? For example, we have this macro that makes KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM easier by letting you just declare an array of test cases: /* Similar to KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM, but avoiding an extra function */ #define KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(name, array, desc_member) \ static const void *name##_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc) \ { \ typeof((array)[0]) *__next = prev ? ((typeof(__next)) prev) + 1 : (array); \ if (__next - (array) < ARRAY_SIZE((array))) { \ strscpy(desc, __next->desc_member, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE); \ return __next; \ } \ return NULL; \ } Also, since we're working on wifi and thus networking, we want e.g. SKBs to be resource-managed, and added some helper macros/functions for using kunit_alloc_resource() with SKBs, that will be used at least in cfg80211 and mac80211 soon, so it would seem appropriate to have include/kunit/skb.h (and a corresponding C file somewhere) with these helpers. Is all of this just a case of "nobody needed it so far", or is there no expectation to add such infrastructure more generally? johannes

2 years, 3 months

2
3
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Remove two infinite loop bound check cases

by Xu Kuohai

From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai(a)huawei.com> The two infinite loop bound check cases added by commit 1a3148fc171f ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range") take a long time to execute but don't add much value. Remove them to reduce run time of test_verifier. Fixes: 1a3148fc171f ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range") Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai(a)huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 50 ------------------- 1 file changed, 50 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 74b1917d4208..515a8222f08f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -777,31 +777,6 @@ .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, -{ - "bound check with JMP_JSLT for crossing 64-bit signed boundary", - .insns = { - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 8), - - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), - BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffffffffffff10), - BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), - - BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x8000000000000000), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), - /* r1 signed range is [S64_MIN, S64_MAX] */ - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2), - - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "BPF program is too large", - .result = REJECT, - .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, -}, { "bound check for loop upper bound greater than U32_MAX", .insns = { @@ -849,28 +824,3 @@ .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, -{ - "bound check with JMP32_JSLT for crossing 32-bit signed boundary", - .insns = { - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 6), - - BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), - BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffff10), - BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), - - BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x80000000), - BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), - /* r1 signed range is [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] */ - BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2), - - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - }, - .errstr = "BPF program is too large", - .result = REJECT, - .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, -}, -- 2.30.2

2 years, 3 months

2
4
0 0

Słowa kluczowe do wypozycjonowania

by Adam Charachuta

Dzień dobry, zapoznałem się z Państwa ofertą i z przyjemnością przyznaję, że przyciąga uwagę i zachęca do dalszych rozmów. Pomyślałem, że może mógłbym mieć swój wkład w Państwa rozwój i pomóc dotrzeć z tą ofertą do większego grona odbiorców. Pozycjonuję strony www, dzięki czemu generują świetny ruch w sieci. Możemy porozmawiać w najbliższym czasie? Pozdrawiam Adam Charachuta

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Improve integration with kselftest runner

by Mark Brown

The ftrace selftests do not currently produce KTAP output, they produce a custom format much nicer for human consumption. This means that when run in automated test systems we just get a single result for the suite as a whole rather than recording results for individual test cases, making it harder to look at the test data and masking things like inappropriate skips. Address this by adding support for KTAP output to the ftracetest script and providing a trivial wrapper which will be invoked by the kselftest runner to generate output in this format by default, users using ftracetest directly will continue to get the existing output. This is not the most elegant solution but it is simple and effective. I did consider implementing this by post processing the existing output format but that felt more complex and likely to result in all output being lost if something goes seriously wrong during the run which would not be helpful. I did also consider just writing a separate runner script but there's enough going on with things like the signal handling for that to seem like it would be duplicating too much. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/Makefile | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest-ktap | 8 ++++ 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/Makefile index d6e106fbce11..a1e955d2de4c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 all: -TEST_PROGS := ftracetest +TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := ftracetest +TEST_PROGS := ftracetest-ktap TEST_FILES := test.d settings EXTRA_CLEAN := $(OUTPUT)/logs/* diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest index c3311c8c4089..539c8d6d5d71 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ echo "Usage: ftracetest [options] [testcase(s)] [testcase-directory(s)]" echo " Options:" echo " -h|--help Show help message" echo " -k|--keep Keep passed test logs" +echo " -K|--KTAP Output in KTAP format" echo " -v|--verbose Increase verbosity of test messages" echo " -vv Alias of -v -v (Show all results in stdout)" echo " -vvv Alias of -v -v -v (Show all commands immediately)" @@ -85,6 +86,10 @@ parse_opts() { # opts KEEP_LOG=1 shift 1 ;; + --ktap|-K) + KTAP=1 + shift 1 + ;; --verbose|-v|-vv|-vvv) if [ $VERBOSE -eq -1 ]; then usage "--console can not use with --verbose" @@ -178,6 +183,7 @@ TEST_DIR=$TOP_DIR/test.d TEST_CASES=`find_testcases $TEST_DIR` LOG_DIR=$TOP_DIR/logs/`date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S`/ KEEP_LOG=0 +KTAP=0 DEBUG=0 VERBOSE=0 UNSUPPORTED_RESULT=0 @@ -229,7 +235,7 @@ prlog() { # messages newline= shift fi - printf "$*$newline" + [ "$KTAP" != "1" ] && printf "$*$newline" [ "$LOG_FILE" ] && printf "$*$newline" | strip_esc >> $LOG_FILE } catlog() { #file @@ -260,11 +266,11 @@ TOTAL_RESULT=0 INSTANCE= CASENO=0 +CASENAME= testcase() { # testfile CASENO=$((CASENO+1)) - desc=`grep "^#[ \t]*description:" $1 | cut -f2- -d:` - prlog -n "[$CASENO]$INSTANCE$desc" + CASENAME=`grep "^#[ \t]*description:" $1 | cut -f2- -d:` } checkreq() { # testfile @@ -277,40 +283,68 @@ test_on_instance() { # testfile grep -q "^#[ \t]*flags:.*instance" $1 } +ktaptest() { # result comment + if [ "$KTAP" != "1" ]; then + return + fi + + local result= + if [ "$1" = "1" ]; then + result="ok" + else + result="not ok" + fi + shift + + local comment=$* + if [ "$comment" != "" ]; then + comment="# $comment" + fi + + echo $CASENO $result $INSTANCE$CASENAME $comment +} + eval_result() { # sigval case $1 in $PASS) prlog " [${color_green}PASS${color_reset}]" + ktaptest 1 PASSED_CASES="$PASSED_CASES $CASENO" return 0 ;; $FAIL) prlog " [${color_red}FAIL${color_reset}]" + ktaptest 0 FAILED_CASES="$FAILED_CASES $CASENO" return 1 # this is a bug. ;; $UNRESOLVED) prlog " [${color_blue}UNRESOLVED${color_reset}]" + ktaptest 0 UNRESOLVED UNRESOLVED_CASES="$UNRESOLVED_CASES $CASENO" return $UNRESOLVED_RESULT # depends on use case ;; $UNTESTED) prlog " [${color_blue}UNTESTED${color_reset}]" + ktaptest 1 SKIP UNTESTED_CASES="$UNTESTED_CASES $CASENO" return 0 ;; $UNSUPPORTED) prlog " [${color_blue}UNSUPPORTED${color_reset}]" + ktaptest 1 SKIP UNSUPPORTED_CASES="$UNSUPPORTED_CASES $CASENO" return $UNSUPPORTED_RESULT # depends on use case ;; $XFAIL) prlog " [${color_green}XFAIL${color_reset}]" + ktaptest 1 XFAIL XFAILED_CASES="$XFAILED_CASES $CASENO" return 0 ;; *) prlog " [${color_blue}UNDEFINED${color_reset}]" + ktaptest 0 error UNDEFINED_CASES="$UNDEFINED_CASES $CASENO" return 1 # this must be a test bug ;; @@ -371,6 +405,7 @@ __run_test() { # testfile run_test() { # testfile local testname=`basename $1` testcase $1 + prlog -n "[$CASENO]$INSTANCE$CASENAME" if [ ! -z "$LOG_FILE" ] ; then local testlog=`mktemp $LOG_DIR/${CASENO}-${testname}-log.XXXXXX` else @@ -405,6 +440,17 @@ run_test() { # testfile # load in the helper functions . $TEST_DIR/functions +if [ "$KTAP" = "1" ]; then + echo "TAP version 13" + + casecount=`echo $TEST_CASES | wc -w` + for t in $TEST_CASES; do + test_on_instance $t || continue + casecount=$((casecount+1)) + done + echo "1..${casecount}" +fi + # Main loop for t in $TEST_CASES; do run_test $t @@ -439,6 +485,17 @@ prlog "# of unsupported: " `echo $UNSUPPORTED_CASES | wc -w` prlog "# of xfailed: " `echo $XFAILED_CASES | wc -w` prlog "# of undefined(test bug): " `echo $UNDEFINED_CASES | wc -w` +if [ "$KTAP" = "1" ]; then + echo -n "# Totals:" + echo -n " pass:"`echo $PASSED_CASES | wc -w` + echo -n " faii:"`echo $FAILED_CASES | wc -w` + echo -n " xfail:"`echo $XFAILED_CASES | wc -w` + echo -n " xpass:0" + echo -n " skip:"`echo $UNTESTED_CASES $UNSUPPORTED_CASES | wc -w` + echo -n " error:"`echo $UNRESOLVED_CASES $UNDEFINED_CASES | wc -w` + echo +fi + cleanup # if no error, return 0 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest-ktap b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest-ktap new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..b3284679ef3a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest-ktap @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#!/bin/sh -e +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +# +# ftracetest-ktap: Wrapper to integrate ftracetest with the kselftest runner +# +# Copyright (C) Arm Ltd., 2023 + +./ftracetest -K --- base-commit: fe15c26ee26efa11741a7b632e9f23b01aca4cc6 change-id: 20230302-ftrace-kselftest-ktap-9d7878691557 Best regards, -- Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org>

2 years, 3 months

4
4
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: sched: Add more core schedule prctl calls

by Ivan Orlov

The core sched kselftest makes prctl calls only with correct parameters. This patch will extend this test with more core schedule prctl calls with wrong parameters to increase code coverage. Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c index 25e0d95d3713..df8e4629b3b5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c @@ -334,6 +334,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) != 0); validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) == get_cs_cookie(procs[pidx].thr_tids[0])); + printf("\n## Try to pass wrong subcommand PR_SCHED_CORE_MAX = %d to prctl (shouldn't succeed)\n", PR_SCHED_CORE_MAX); + validate(_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_MAX, 0, PIDTYPE_PGID, 0) < 0 + && errno == EINVAL); + + printf("\n## Try to pass not-null uaddr with forbidden command (shouldn't succeed)\n"); + validate(_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, 0, PIDTYPE_PGID, 1) < 0 + && errno == EINVAL); + if (errors) { printf("TESTS FAILED. errors: %d\n", errors); res = 10; -- 2.34.1

2 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH rcu v2 0/7] RCU-related lockdep changes for v6.4

by Boqun Feng

Hi, Another week, another version ;-) Previous versions: v1: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20230317031339.10277-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/ Changes since v1: * Minor typo fixes * Apply Acked-by tags * Add license and copyright headers for srcu_lockdep.sh Thank you all for helping improve this! You can also find this series at https://github/fbq/linux rcu/lockdep.2023.03.22a top commit is: 450ef54e199f List of changes: Boqun Feng (4): locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_sync() rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependencies locking: Reduce the number of locks in ww_mutex stress tests locking/lockdep: Improve the deadlock scenario print for sync and read lock Paul E. McKenney (3): rcutorture: Add SRCU deadlock scenarios rcutorture: Add RCU Tasks Trace and SRCU deadlock scenarios rcutorture: Add srcu_lockdep.sh include/linux/lockdep.h | 8 +- include/linux/srcu.h | 34 +++- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 64 +++++- kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 2 +- kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 2 + kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 + .../selftests/rcutorture/bin/srcu_lockdep.sh | 78 ++++++++ 8 files changed, 364 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/srcu_lockdep.sh -- 2.38.1

2 years, 3 months

2
8
0 0

[PATCH 0/5] usermode_driver: Add management library and API

by Roberto Sassu

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu(a)huawei.com> A User Mode Driver (UMD) is a specialization of a User Mode Helper (UMH), which runs a user space process from a binary blob, and creates a bidirectional pipe, so that the kernel can make a request to that process, and the latter provides its response. It is currently used by bpfilter, although it does not seem to do any useful work. The problem is, if other users would like to implement a UMD similar to bpfilter, they would have to duplicate the code. Instead, make an UMD management library and API from the existing bpfilter and sockopt code, and move it to common kernel code. Also, define the software architecture and the main components of the library: the UMD Manager, running in the kernel, acting as the frontend interface to any user or kernel-originated request; the UMD Loader, also running in the kernel, responsible to load the UMD Handler; the UMD Handler, running in user space, responsible to handle requests from the UMD Manager and to send to it the response. I have two use cases, but for sake of brevity I will propose one. I would like to add support for PGP keys and signatures in the kernel, so that I can extend secure boot to applications, and allow/deny code execution based on the signed file digests included in RPM headers. While I proposed a patch set a while ago (based on a previous work of David Howells), the main objection was that the PGP packet parser should not run in the kernel. That makes a perfect example for using a UMD. If the PGP parser is moved to user space (UMD Handler), and the kernel (UMD Manager) just instantiates the key and verifies the signature on already parsed data, this would address the concern. Patch 1 moves the function bpfilter_send_req() to usermode_driver.c and makes the pipe between the kernel and the user space process suitable for larger quantity of data (> 64K). Patch 2 introduces the management library and API. Patch 3 replaces the existing bpfilter and sockopt code with calls to the management API. To use the new mechanism, sockopt itself (acts as UMD Manager) now sends/receives messages to/from bpfilter_umh (acts as UMD Handler), instead of bpfilter (acts as UMD Loader). Patch 4 introduces a sample UMD, useful for other implementors, and uses it for testing. Patch 5 introduces the documentation of the new management library and API. Roberto Sassu (5): usermode_driver: Introduce umd_send_recv() from bpfilter usermode_driver_mgmt: Introduce management of user mode drivers bpfilter: Port to user mode driver management API selftests/umd_mgmt: Add selftests for UMD management library doc: Add documentation for the User Mode Driver management library Documentation/driver-api/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/driver-api/umd_mgmt.rst | 99 +++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 9 ++ include/linux/bpfilter.h | 12 +- include/linux/usermode_driver.h | 2 + include/linux/usermode_driver_mgmt.h | 35 +++++ kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/usermode_driver.c | 47 +++++- kernel/usermode_driver_mgmt.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++ net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c | 120 +-------------- net/ipv4/bpfilter/sockopt.c | 67 +++++---- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/Makefile | 14 ++ tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/config | 1 + .../selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/Makefile | 22 +++ .../selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/msgfmt.h | 13 ++ .../umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_binary_blob.S | 7 + .../umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_handler.c | 81 +++++++++++ .../umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_loader.c | 28 ++++ .../umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_mgr.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/umd_mgmt.sh | 40 +++++ 22 files changed, 707 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/umd_mgmt.rst create mode 100644 include/linux/usermode_driver_mgmt.h create mode 100644 kernel/usermode_driver_mgmt.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/config create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/msgfmt.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_binary_blob.S create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_handler.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_loader.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/sample_umd/sample_mgr.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/umd_mgmt/umd_mgmt.sh -- 2.25.1

2 years, 3 months

3
12
0 0

Re: [PATCH] selftests: cgroup: Fix exception handling in test_memcg_oom_group_score_events()

by David Vernet

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:56:03AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> 2. Can a cg_destroy() call ever work as expected if a cg_create() call failed? > > > > Perhaps next time you can answer your own question by spending 30 > > seconds actually reading the code you're "fixing": > > > > int cg_destroy(const char *cgroup) > > { > … > > ret = rmdir(cgroup); > … > > if (ret && errno == ENOENT) <<< that case is explicitly handled here > > ret = 0; > > > > return ret; > > } > > Is it interesting somehow that a non-existing directory (which would occasionally > not be found) is tolerated so far? > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc3/source/tools/testing/selftests/cg… > > Should such a function call be avoided because of a failed cg_create() call? The point is that (a) you were wrong that this is fixing anything, and (b) this patch is functionally useless. Sure, we could move some goto's around and subjectively improve "something". Why? What's the point? It's highly debatable that what you're doing is even an improvement, and I'm not interested in wasting time pontificating about the merits of a trivial "fix" for a test cleanup function that isn't even broken. Several people have already either advised or directly asked you to stop sending these patches. I'm not sure why you're choosing to ignore them, but I'll throw my hat in the ring regardless and do the same. Please stop sending these fake cleanup patches.

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror