- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

selftests: bpf: test_libbpf.sh failed at file test_l4lb.o

by Naresh Kamboju

selftests: bpf test_libbpf.sh failed running Linux -next kernel 20190618 and 20190619. Here is the log from x86_64, # selftests bpf test_libbpf.sh bpf: test_libbpf.sh_ # # [0] libbpf BTF is required, but is missing or corrupted. libbpf: BTF_is # # test_libbpf failed at file test_l4lb.o failed: at_file # # selftests test_libbpf [FAILED] test_libbpf: [FAILED]_ # [FAIL] 29 selftests bpf test_libbpf.sh selftests: bpf_test_libbpf.sh [FAIL] Full test log, https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/build/next-20190619/testru… Test results comparison, https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-oe/tests/kselftest/bpf_test_l… Good linux -next tag: next-20190617 Bad linux -next tag: next-20190618 git branch master git commit 1c6b40509daf5190b1fd2c758649f7df1da4827b git repo https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git Best regards Naresh Kamboju

6 years, 2 months

4
7
0 0

Fwd: BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in ata_exec_internal_sg+0x50f/0xc70

by Jeffrin Thalakkottoor

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jeffrin Thalakkottoor <jeffrin(a)rajagiritech.edu.in> Date: Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:06 AM Subject: BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in ata_exec_internal_sg+0x50f/0xc70 To: <axboe(a)kernel.dk>, <jejb(a)linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen(a)oracle.com> Cc: lkml <linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ide(a)vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi(a)vger.kernel.org> hello , [ 55.169278] ================================================================== [ 55.169899] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in ata_exec_internal_sg+0x50f/0xc70 [libata] [ 55.170039] Read of size 16 at addr ffffffffc0723500 by task scsi_eh_1/149 [ 55.186354] The buggy address belongs to the variable: [ 55.186972] cdb.48295+0x0/0xfffffffffffeab00 [libata] [ 55.187171] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 55.187290] ffffffffc0723400: 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa [ 55.187417] ffffffffc0723480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa [ 55.187544] >ffffffffc0723500: 00 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa [ 55.187686] ^ [ 55.187810] ffffffffc0723580: 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 55.187940] ffffffffc0723600: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 55.188060] ================================================================== output of dmesg with the filename kasan.txt attached -- software engineer rajagiri school of engineering and technology

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v17 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel

by Andrey Konovalov

=== Overview arm64 has a feature called Top Byte Ignore, which allows to embed pointer tags into the top byte of each pointer. Userspace programs (such as HWASan, a memory debugging tool [1]) might use this feature and pass tagged user pointers to the kernel through syscalls or other interfaces. Right now the kernel is already able to handle user faults with tagged pointers, due to these patches: 1. 81cddd65 ("arm64: traps: fix userspace cache maintenance emulation on a tagged pointer") 2. 7dcd9dd8 ("arm64: hw_breakpoint: fix watchpoint matching for tagged pointers") 3. 276e9327 ("arm64: entry: improve data abort handling of tagged pointers") This patchset extends tagged pointer support to syscall arguments. As per the proposed ABI change [3], tagged pointers are only allowed to be passed to syscalls when they point to memory ranges obtained by anonymous mmap() or sbrk() (see the patchset [3] for more details). For non-memory syscalls this is done by untaging user pointers when the kernel performs pointer checking to find out whether the pointer comes from userspace (most notably in access_ok). The untagging is done only when the pointer is being checked, the tag is preserved as the pointer makes its way through the kernel and stays tagged when the kernel dereferences the pointer when perfoming user memory accesses. The mmap and mremap (only new_addr) syscalls do not currently accept tagged addresses. Architectures may interpret the tag as a background colour for the corresponding vma. Other memory syscalls (mprotect, etc.) don't do user memory accesses but rather deal with memory ranges, and untagged pointers are better suited to describe memory ranges internally. Thus for memory syscalls we untag pointers completely when they enter the kernel. === Other approaches One of the alternative approaches to untagging that was considered is to completely strip the pointer tag as the pointer enters the kernel with some kind of a syscall wrapper, but that won't work with the countless number of different ioctl calls. With this approach we would need a custom wrapper for each ioctl variation, which doesn't seem practical. An alternative approach to untagging pointers in memory syscalls prologues is to inspead allow tagged pointers to be passed to find_vma() (and other vma related functions) and untag them there. Unfortunately, a lot of find_vma() callers then compare or subtract the returned vma start and end fields against the pointer that was being searched. Thus this approach would still require changing all find_vma() callers. === Testing The following testing approaches has been taken to find potential issues with user pointer untagging: 1. Static testing (with sparse [2] and separately with a custom static analyzer based on Clang) to track casts of __user pointers to integer types to find places where untagging needs to be done. 2. Static testing with grep to find parts of the kernel that call find_vma() (and other similar functions) or directly compare against vm_start/vm_end fields of vma. 3. Static testing with grep to find parts of the kernel that compare user pointers with TASK_SIZE or other similar consts and macros. 4. Dynamic testing: adding BUG_ON(has_tag(addr)) to find_vma() and running a modified syzkaller version that passes tagged pointers to the kernel. Based on the results of the testing the requried patches have been added to the patchset. === Notes This patchset is meant to be merged together with "arm64 relaxed ABI" [3]. This patchset is a prerequisite for ARM's memory tagging hardware feature support [4]. This patchset has been merged into the Pixel 2 & 3 kernel trees and is now being used to enable testing of Pixel phones with HWASan. Thanks! [1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html [2] https://github.com/lucvoo/sparse-dev/commit/5f960cb10f56ec2017c128ef9d16060… [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/18/819 [4] https://community.arm.com/processors/b/blog/posts/arm-a-profile-architectur… === History Changes in v17: - The "uaccess: add noop untagged_addr definition" patch is dropped, as it was merged into upstream named as "uaccess: add noop untagged_addr definition". - Merged "mm, arm64: untag user pointers in do_pages_move" into "mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls". - Added "arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user addresses ABI" patch from Catalin. - Add tags_lib.so to tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore. - Added a comment clarifying untagged in mremap. - Moved untagging back into mlx4_get_umem_mr() for the IB patch. Changes in v16: - Moved untagging for memory syscalls from arm64 wrappers back to generic code. - Dropped untagging for the following memory syscalls: brk, mmap, munmap; mremap (only dropped for new_address); mmap_pgoff (not used on arm64); remap_file_pages (deprecated); shmat, shmdt (work on shared memory). - Changed kselftest to LD_PRELOAD a shared library that overrides malloc to return tagged pointers. - Rebased onto 5.2-rc3. Changes in v15: - Removed unnecessary untagging from radeon_ttm_tt_set_userptr(). - Removed unnecessary untagging from amdgpu_ttm_tt_set_userptr(). - Moved untagging to validate_range() in userfaultfd code. - Moved untagging to ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr() from mlx4_get_umem_mr(). - Rebased onto 5.1. Changes in v14: - Moved untagging for most memory syscalls to an arm64 specific implementation, instead of doing that in the common code. - Dropped "net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive", since the provided user pointers don't come from an anonymous map and thus are not covered by this ABI relaxation. - Dropped "kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*". - Moved untagging from __check_mem_type() to tee_shm_register(). - Updated untagging for the amdgpu and radeon drivers to cover the MMU notifier, as suggested by Felix. - Since this ABI relaxation doesn't actually allow tagged instruction pointers, dropped the following patches: - Dropped "tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip". - Dropped "uprobes, arm64: untag user pointers in find_active_uprobe". - Dropped "bpf, arm64: untag user pointers in stack_map_get_build_id_offset". - Rebased onto 5.1-rc7 (37624b58). Changes in v13: - Simplified untagging in tcp_zerocopy_receive(). - Looked at find_vma() callers in drivers/, which allowed to identify a few other places where untagging is needed. - Added patch "mm, arm64: untag user pointers in get_vaddr_frames". - Added patch "drm/amdgpu, arm64: untag user pointers in amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages". - Added patch "drm/radeon, arm64: untag user pointers in radeon_ttm_tt_pin_userptr". - Added patch "IB/mlx4, arm64: untag user pointers in mlx4_get_umem_mr". - Added patch "media/v4l2-core, arm64: untag user pointers in videobuf_dma_contig_user_get". - Added patch "tee/optee, arm64: untag user pointers in check_mem_type". - Added patch "vfio/type1, arm64: untag user pointers". Changes in v12: - Changed untagging in tcp_zerocopy_receive() to also untag zc->address. - Fixed untagging in prctl_set_mm* to only untag pointers for vma lookups and validity checks, but leave them as is for actual user space accesses. - Updated the link to the v2 of the "arm64 relaxed ABI" patchset [3]. - Dropped the documentation patch, as the "arm64 relaxed ABI" patchset [3] handles that. Changes in v11: - Added "uprobes, arm64: untag user pointers in find_active_uprobe" patch. - Added "bpf, arm64: untag user pointers in stack_map_get_build_id_offset" patch. - Fixed "tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip" to correctly perform subtration with a tagged addr. - Moved untagged_addr() from SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect) and SYSCALL_DEFINE4(pkey_mprotect) to do_mprotect_pkey(). - Moved untagged_addr() definition for other arches from include/linux/memory.h to include/linux/mm.h. - Changed untagging in strn*_user() to perform userspace accesses through tagged pointers. - Updated the documentation to mention that passing tagged pointers to memory syscalls is allowed. - Updated the test to use malloc'ed memory instead of stack memory. Changes in v10: - Added "mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls" back. - New patch "fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c". - New patch "net, arm64: untag user pointers in tcp_zerocopy_receive". - New patch "kernel, arm64: untag user pointers in prctl_set_mm*". - New patch "tracing, arm64: untag user pointers in seq_print_user_ip". Changes in v9: - Rebased onto 4.20-rc6. - Used u64 instead of __u64 in type casts in the untagged_addr macro for arm64. - Added braces around (addr) in the untagged_addr macro for other arches. Changes in v8: - Rebased onto 65102238 (4.20-rc1). - Added a note to the cover letter on why syscall wrappers/shims that untag user pointers won't work. - Added a note to the cover letter that this patchset has been merged into the Pixel 2 kernel tree. - Documentation fixes, in particular added a list of syscalls that don't support tagged user pointers. Changes in v7: - Rebased onto 17b57b18 (4.19-rc6). - Dropped the "arm64: untag user address in __do_user_fault" patch, since the existing patches already handle user faults properly. - Dropped the "usb, arm64: untag user addresses in devio" patch, since the passed pointer must come from a vma and therefore be untagged. - Dropped the "arm64: annotate user pointers casts detected by sparse" patch (see the discussion to the replies of the v6 of this patchset). - Added more context to the cover letter. - Updated Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt. Changes in v6: - Added annotations for user pointer casts found by sparse. - Rebased onto 050cdc6c (4.19-rc1+). Changes in v5: - Added 3 new patches that add untagging to places found with static analysis. - Rebased onto 44c929e1 (4.18-rc8). Changes in v4: - Added a selftest for checking that passing tagged pointers to the kernel succeeds. - Rebased onto 81e97f013 (4.18-rc1+). Changes in v3: - Rebased onto e5c51f30 (4.17-rc6+). - Added linux-arch@ to the list of recipients. Changes in v2: - Rebased onto 2d618bdf (4.17-rc3+). - Removed excessive untagging in gup.c. - Removed untagging pointers returned from __uaccess_mask_ptr. Changes in v1: - Rebased onto 4.17-rc1. Changes in RFC v2: - Added "#ifndef untagged_addr..." fallback in linux/uaccess.h instead of defining it for each arch individually. - Updated Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt. - Dropped "mm, arm64: untag user addresses in memory syscalls". - Rebased onto 3eb2ce82 (4.16-rc7). Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl(a)google.com> Andrey Konovalov (14): arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c mm, arm64: untag user pointers in get_vaddr_frames fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options userfaultfd, arm64: untag user pointers drm/amdgpu, arm64: untag user pointers drm/radeon, arm64: untag user pointers in radeon_gem_userptr_ioctl IB/mlx4, arm64: untag user pointers in mlx4_get_umem_mr media/v4l2-core, arm64: untag user pointers in videobuf_dma_contig_user_get tee/shm, arm64: untag user pointers in tee_shm_register vfio/type1, arm64: untag user pointers in vaddr_get_pfn selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel Catalin Marinas (1): arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user addresses ABI arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++ arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 11 ++- arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++ .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c | 2 + drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/mr.c | 7 +- drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c | 9 +-- drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 1 + drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 2 + fs/namespace.c | 2 +- fs/userfaultfd.c | 22 +++--- include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 5 ++ kernel/sys.c | 16 +++++ lib/strncpy_from_user.c | 3 +- lib/strnlen_user.c | 3 +- mm/frame_vector.c | 2 + mm/gup.c | 4 ++ mm/madvise.c | 2 + mm/mempolicy.c | 3 + mm/migrate.c | 2 +- mm/mincore.c | 2 + mm/mlock.c | 4 ++ mm/mprotect.c | 2 + mm/mremap.c | 7 ++ mm/msync.c | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile | 22 ++++++ .../testing/selftests/arm64/run_tags_test.sh | 12 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_lib.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_test.c | 18 +++++ 32 files changed, 282 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/run_tags_test.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_lib.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_test.c -- 2.22.0.rc2.383.gf4fbbf30c2-goog

6 years, 2 months

10
75
0 0

[PATCH 4.19 47/90] kselftest/cgroup: fix incorrect test_core skip

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[ Upstream commit f97f3f8839eb9de5843066d80819884f7722c8c5 ] The test_core will skip the test_cgcore_no_internal_process_constraint_on_threads test case if the 'cpu' controller missing in root's subtree_control. In fact we need to set the 'cpu' in subtree_control, to make the testing meaningful. ./test_core ... ok 4 # skip test_cgcore_no_internal_process_constraint_on_threads ... Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio Zumbo <claudioz(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio <claudiozumbo(a)gmail.com> Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c index d78f1c5366d3..79053a4f4783 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int test_cgcore_no_internal_process_constraint_on_threads(const char *roo char *parent = NULL, *child = NULL; if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.controllers", "cpu") || - cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "cpu")) { + cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+cpu")) { ret = KSFT_SKIP; goto cleanup; } -- 2.20.1

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 4.19 46/90] kselftest/cgroup: fix unexpected testing failure on test_core

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[ Upstream commit 00e38a5d753d7788852f81703db804a60a84c26e ] The cgroup testing relys on the root cgroup's subtree_control setting, If the 'memory' controller isn't set, some test cases will be failed as following: $sudo ./test_core not ok 1 test_cgcore_internal_process_constraint ok 2 test_cgcore_top_down_constraint_enable not ok 3 test_cgcore_top_down_constraint_disable ... To correct this unexpected failure, this patch write the 'memory' to subtree_control of root to get a right result. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio Zumbo <claudioz(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio <claudiozumbo(a)gmail.com> Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c index be59f9c34ea2..d78f1c5366d3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c @@ -376,6 +376,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (cg_find_unified_root(root, sizeof(root))) ksft_exit_skip("cgroup v2 isn't mounted\n"); + + if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "memory")) + if (cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory")) + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to set memory controller\n"); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { switch (tests[i].fn(root)) { case KSFT_PASS: -- 2.20.1

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 4.19 45/90] kselftest/cgroup: fix unexpected testing failure on test_memcontrol

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[ Upstream commit f6131f28057d4fd8922599339e701a2504e0f23d ] The cgroup testing relies on the root cgroup's subtree_control setting, If the 'memory' controller isn't set, all test cases will be failed as following: $ sudo ./test_memcontrol not ok 1 test_memcg_subtree_control not ok 2 test_memcg_current ok 3 # skip test_memcg_min not ok 4 test_memcg_low not ok 5 test_memcg_high not ok 6 test_memcg_max not ok 7 test_memcg_oom_events ok 8 # skip test_memcg_swap_max not ok 9 test_memcg_sock not ok 10 test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events not ok 11 test_memcg_oom_group_parent_events not ok 12 test_memcg_oom_group_score_events To correct this unexpected failure, this patch write the 'memory' to subtree_control of root to get a right result. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jay Kamat <jgkamat(a)fb.com> Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c index 6f339882a6ca..c19a97dd02d4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c @@ -1205,6 +1205,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.controllers", "memory")) ksft_exit_skip("memory controller isn't available\n"); + if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "memory")) + if (cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory")) + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to set memory controller\n"); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { switch (tests[i].fn(root)) { case KSFT_PASS: -- 2.20.1

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 5.1 059/121] kselftest/cgroup: fix incorrect test_core skip

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[ Upstream commit f97f3f8839eb9de5843066d80819884f7722c8c5 ] The test_core will skip the test_cgcore_no_internal_process_constraint_on_threads test case if the 'cpu' controller missing in root's subtree_control. In fact we need to set the 'cpu' in subtree_control, to make the testing meaningful. ./test_core ... ok 4 # skip test_cgcore_no_internal_process_constraint_on_threads ... Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio Zumbo <claudioz(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio <claudiozumbo(a)gmail.com> Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c index d78f1c5366d3..79053a4f4783 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int test_cgcore_no_internal_process_constraint_on_threads(const char *roo char *parent = NULL, *child = NULL; if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.controllers", "cpu") || - cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "cpu")) { + cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+cpu")) { ret = KSFT_SKIP; goto cleanup; } -- 2.20.1

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 5.1 058/121] kselftest/cgroup: fix unexpected testing failure on test_core

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[ Upstream commit 00e38a5d753d7788852f81703db804a60a84c26e ] The cgroup testing relys on the root cgroup's subtree_control setting, If the 'memory' controller isn't set, some test cases will be failed as following: $sudo ./test_core not ok 1 test_cgcore_internal_process_constraint ok 2 test_cgcore_top_down_constraint_enable not ok 3 test_cgcore_top_down_constraint_disable ... To correct this unexpected failure, this patch write the 'memory' to subtree_control of root to get a right result. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio Zumbo <claudioz(a)fb.com> Cc: Claudio <claudiozumbo(a)gmail.com> Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c index be59f9c34ea2..d78f1c5366d3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c @@ -376,6 +376,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (cg_find_unified_root(root, sizeof(root))) ksft_exit_skip("cgroup v2 isn't mounted\n"); + + if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "memory")) + if (cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory")) + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to set memory controller\n"); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { switch (tests[i].fn(root)) { case KSFT_PASS: -- 2.20.1

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 5.1 057/121] kselftest/cgroup: fix unexpected testing failure on test_memcontrol

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[ Upstream commit f6131f28057d4fd8922599339e701a2504e0f23d ] The cgroup testing relies on the root cgroup's subtree_control setting, If the 'memory' controller isn't set, all test cases will be failed as following: $ sudo ./test_memcontrol not ok 1 test_memcg_subtree_control not ok 2 test_memcg_current ok 3 # skip test_memcg_min not ok 4 test_memcg_low not ok 5 test_memcg_high not ok 6 test_memcg_max not ok 7 test_memcg_oom_events ok 8 # skip test_memcg_swap_max not ok 9 test_memcg_sock not ok 10 test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events not ok 11 test_memcg_oom_group_parent_events not ok 12 test_memcg_oom_group_score_events To correct this unexpected failure, this patch write the 'memory' to subtree_control of root to get a right result. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi(a)linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jay Kamat <jgkamat(a)fb.com> Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro(a)fb.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c index 6f339882a6ca..c19a97dd02d4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c @@ -1205,6 +1205,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.controllers", "memory")) ksft_exit_skip("memory controller isn't available\n"); + if (cg_read_strstr(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "memory")) + if (cg_write(root, "cgroup.subtree_control", "+memory")) + ksft_exit_skip("Failed to set memory controller\n"); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { switch (tests[i].fn(root)) { case KSFT_PASS: -- 2.20.1

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/tpm2: Install run-time Python modules

by Daniel Díaz

When ordinarily running the tests, upon `make install', the following error is encountered: ImportError: No module named tpm2_tests because the Python files are not installed at the moment. Fix this by adding both Python modules as accompanying TEST_FILES in the Makefile. Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz(a)linaro.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile index 9dd848427a7b..bf401f725eef 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/Makefile @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ include ../lib.mk TEST_PROGS := test_smoke.sh test_space.sh +TEST_FILES := tpm2.py tpm2_tests.py -- 2.20.1

6 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror