Fix a call to userspace_mem_region_find to conform to its spec of
taking an inclusive, inclusive range. It was previously being called
with an inclusive, exclusive range. Also remove a redundant region bounds
check in vm_userspace_mem_region_add. Region overlap checking is already
performed by the call to userspace_mem_region_find.
Tested: Compiled tools/testing/selftests/kvm with -static
Ran all resulting test binaries on an Intel Haswell test machine
All tests passed
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon(a)google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson(a)google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
index 23022e9d32eb81..b52cfdefecbfe9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ void vm_userspace_mem_region_add(struct kvm_vm *vm,
* already exist.
*/
region = (struct userspace_mem_region *) userspace_mem_region_find(
- vm, guest_paddr, guest_paddr + npages * vm->page_size);
+ vm, guest_paddr, (guest_paddr + npages * vm->page_size) - 1);
if (region != NULL)
TEST_ASSERT(false, "overlapping userspace_mem_region already "
"exists\n"
@@ -587,15 +587,10 @@ void vm_userspace_mem_region_add(struct kvm_vm *vm,
region = region->next) {
if (region->region.slot == slot)
break;
- if ((guest_paddr <= (region->region.guest_phys_addr
- + region->region.memory_size))
- && ((guest_paddr + npages * vm->page_size)
- >= region->region.guest_phys_addr))
- break;
}
if (region != NULL)
TEST_ASSERT(false, "A mem region with the requested slot "
- "or overlapping physical memory range already exists.\n"
+ "already exists.\n"
" requested slot: %u paddr: 0x%lx npages: 0x%lx\n"
" existing slot: %u paddr: 0x%lx size: 0x%lx",
slot, guest_paddr, npages,
--
2.20.1.97.g81188d93c3-goog
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
The error return being placed in regs.SYSCALL_RET is currently positive and
this is causing test failures on s390x. The return value should be -EPERM
rather than EPERM otherwise a failure is not detected and errno is not set
accordingly on s390x.
Fixes: a33b2d0359a0 ("selftests/seccomp: Add tests for basic ptrace actions")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
---
V2: remove misplaced Content-Type and Content-Transfer-Encoding fields
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 496a9a8c773a..957344884360 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ void change_syscall(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
#ifdef SYSCALL_NUM_RET_SHARE_REG
TH_LOG("Can't modify syscall return on this architecture");
#else
- regs.SYSCALL_RET = EPERM;
+ regs.SYSCALL_RET = -EPERM;
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_GETREGS
@@ -1850,7 +1850,7 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, ptrace_syscall_dropped)
true);
/* Tracer should skip the open syscall, resulting in EPERM. */
- EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(EPERM, syscall(__NR_openat));
+ EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(-EPERM, syscall(__NR_openat));
}
TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_allowed)
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_dropped)
ASSERT_EQ(0, ret);
/* gettid has been skipped and an altered return value stored. */
- EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(EPERM, syscall(__NR_gettid));
+ EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(-EPERM, syscall(__NR_gettid));
EXPECT_NE(self->mytid, syscall(__NR_gettid));
}
--
2.19.1
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
The error return being placed in regs.SYSCALL_RET is currently positive and
this is causing test failures on s390x. The return value should be -EPERM
rather than EPERM otherwise a failure is not detected and errno is not set
accordingly on s390x.
Fixes: a33b2d0359a0 ("selftests/seccomp: Add tests for basic ptrace actions")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 496a9a8c773a..957344884360 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ void change_syscall(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
#ifdef SYSCALL_NUM_RET_SHARE_REG
TH_LOG("Can't modify syscall return on this architecture");
#else
- regs.SYSCALL_RET = EPERM;
+ regs.SYSCALL_RET = -EPERM;
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_GETREGS
@@ -1850,7 +1850,7 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, ptrace_syscall_dropped)
true);
/* Tracer should skip the open syscall, resulting in EPERM. */
- EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(EPERM, syscall(__NR_openat));
+ EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(-EPERM, syscall(__NR_openat));
}
TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_allowed)
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, syscall_dropped)
ASSERT_EQ(0, ret);
/* gettid has been skipped and an altered return value stored. */
- EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(EPERM, syscall(__NR_gettid));
+ EXPECT_SYSCALL_RETURN(-EPERM, syscall(__NR_gettid));
EXPECT_NE(self->mytid, syscall(__NR_gettid));
}
--
2.19.1
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
The cpu-hotplug test assumes that we can offline the maximum CPU as
described by /sys/devices/system/cpu/offline. However, in the case
where the number of CPUs exceeds like kernel configuration then
the offline count can be greater than the present count and we end
up trying to test the offlining of a CPU that is not available to
offline. Fix this by testing the maximum present CPU instead.
Also, the test currently offlines the CPU and does not online it,
so fix this by onlining the CPU after the test.
Fixes: d89dffa976bc ("fault-injection: add selftests for cpu and memory hotplug")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king(a)canonical.com>
---
V2: remove some debug and an empty line
---
.../selftests/cpu-hotplug/cpu-on-off-test.sh | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-hotplug/cpu-on-off-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-hotplug/cpu-on-off-test.sh
index bab13dd025a6..0d26b5e3f966 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-hotplug/cpu-on-off-test.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cpu-hotplug/cpu-on-off-test.sh
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ prerequisite()
exit $ksft_skip
fi
+ present_cpus=`cat $SYSFS/devices/system/cpu/present`
+ present_max=${present_cpus##*-}
+ echo "present_cpus = $present_cpus present_max = $present_max"
+
echo -e "\t Cpus in online state: $online_cpus"
offline_cpus=`cat $SYSFS/devices/system/cpu/offline`
@@ -151,6 +155,8 @@ online_cpus=0
online_max=0
offline_cpus=0
offline_max=0
+present_cpus=0
+present_max=0
while getopts e:ahp: opt; do
case $opt in
@@ -190,9 +196,10 @@ if [ $allcpus -eq 0 ]; then
online_cpu_expect_success $online_max
if [[ $offline_cpus -gt 0 ]]; then
- echo -e "\t offline to online to offline: cpu $offline_max"
- online_cpu_expect_success $offline_max
- offline_cpu_expect_success $offline_max
+ echo -e "\t offline to online to offline: cpu $present_max"
+ online_cpu_expect_success $present_max
+ offline_cpu_expect_success $present_max
+ online_cpu $present_max
fi
exit 0
else
--
2.19.1
Le 27/09/2016 à 16:10, Rui Teng a écrit :
> From: Anton Blanchard <anton(a)au.ibm.com>
>
> Pull in a version of Anton's null_syscall benchmark:
> http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/null_syscall.c
> Into tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe(a)ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton(a)au.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Teng <rui.teng(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/null_syscall.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/null_syscall.c
>
[...]
> +
> +static void do_null_syscall(unsigned long nr)
> +{
> + unsigned long i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
> + getppid();
> +}
> +
Looks like getppid() performs a rcu_read_lock(). Is that what we want ?
Shouldn't we use getpid() instead for a lighter syscall ?
Christophe