- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit

by André Almeida

Remove custom functions for testing and use KUnit framework. Test cases and test data remains the same. Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid(a)collabora.com> --- lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 +++-- lib/Makefile | 2 +- lib/test_uuid.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 678c13967580..e8bd574d7a67 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -2188,9 +2188,6 @@ config TEST_BITMAP If unsure, say N. -config TEST_UUID - tristate "Test functions located in the uuid module at runtime" - config TEST_XARRAY tristate "Test the XArray code at runtime" @@ -2429,6 +2426,16 @@ config BITS_TEST If unsure, say N. +config TEST_UUID + tristate "Unit test for UUID" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + This builds the UUID unit test. + Tests parsing functions for UUID/GUID strings. + + If unsure, say N. + config TEST_UDELAY tristate "udelay test driver" help diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 2cc359ec1fdd..6ef3c614409d 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_STATIC_KEYS) += test_static_key_base.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_PRINTF) += test_printf.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_BITMAP) += test_bitmap.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_STRSCPY) += test_strscpy.o -obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_UUID) += test_uuid.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY) += test_xarray.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_PARMAN) += test_parman.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_KMOD) += test_kmod.o @@ -354,5 +353,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) += cmdline_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_UUID) += test_uuid.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o diff --git a/lib/test_uuid.c b/lib/test_uuid.c index cd819c397dc7..45c919b0d724 100644 --- a/lib/test_uuid.c +++ b/lib/test_uuid.c @@ -1,21 +1,20 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause) /* - * Test cases for lib/uuid.c module. + * Unit tests for lib/uuid.c module. + * + * Copyright 2016 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com> + * Copyright 2021 André Almeida <andrealmeid(a)riseup.net> */ -#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt - -#include <linux/init.h> -#include <linux/kernel.h> -#include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/string.h> +#include <kunit/test.h> #include <linux/uuid.h> -struct test_uuid_data { +struct test_data { const char *uuid; guid_t le; uuid_t be; }; -static const struct test_uuid_data test_uuid_test_data[] = { +static const struct test_data correct_data[] = { { .uuid = "c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576", .le = GUID_INIT(0xc33f4995, 0x3701, 0x450e, 0x9f, 0xbf, 0x20, 0x6a, 0x2e, 0x98, 0xe5, 0x76), @@ -33,101 +32,73 @@ static const struct test_uuid_data test_uuid_test_data[] = { }, }; -static const char * const test_uuid_wrong_data[] = { +static const char * const wrong_data[] = { "c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576 ", /* no hyphen(s) */ "64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b", /* invalid character(s) */ "0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e", /* not enough data */ }; -static unsigned total_tests __initdata; -static unsigned failed_tests __initdata; - -static void __init test_uuid_failed(const char *prefix, bool wrong, bool be, - const char *data, const char *actual) +static void uuid_correct_le(struct kunit *test) { - pr_err("%s test #%u %s %s data: '%s'\n", - prefix, - total_tests, - wrong ? "passed on wrong" : "failed on", - be ? "BE" : "LE", - data); - if (actual && *actual) - pr_err("%s test #%u actual data: '%s'\n", - prefix, - total_tests, - actual); - failed_tests++; + guid_t le; + const struct test_data *data = (const struct test_data *)(test->param_value); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, guid_parse(data->uuid, &le), 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, guid_equal(&data->le, &le)); } -static void __init test_uuid_test(const struct test_uuid_data *data) +static void uuid_correct_be(struct kunit *test) { - guid_t le; uuid_t be; - char buf[48]; - - /* LE */ - total_tests++; - if (guid_parse(data->uuid, &le)) - test_uuid_failed("conversion", false, false, data->uuid, NULL); - - total_tests++; - if (!guid_equal(&data->le, &le)) { - sprintf(buf, "%pUl", &le); - test_uuid_failed("cmp", false, false, data->uuid, buf); - } - - /* BE */ - total_tests++; - if (uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be)) - test_uuid_failed("conversion", false, true, data->uuid, NULL); - - total_tests++; - if (!uuid_equal(&data->be, &be)) { - sprintf(buf, "%pUb", &be); - test_uuid_failed("cmp", false, true, data->uuid, buf); - } + const struct test_data *data = (const struct test_data *)(test->param_value); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be), 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, uuid_equal(&data->be, &be)); } -static void __init test_uuid_wrong(const char *data) +static void uuid_wrong_le(struct kunit *test) { guid_t le; - uuid_t be; - - /* LE */ - total_tests++; - if (!guid_parse(data, &le)) - test_uuid_failed("negative", true, false, data, NULL); + const char *data = (const char *)(test->param_value); - /* BE */ - total_tests++; - if (!uuid_parse(data, &be)) - test_uuid_failed("negative", true, true, data, NULL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, guid_parse(data, &le), 0); } -static int __init test_uuid_init(void) +static void uuid_wrong_be(struct kunit *test) { - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_uuid_test_data); i++) - test_uuid_test(&test_uuid_test_data[i]); - - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_uuid_wrong_data); i++) - test_uuid_wrong(test_uuid_wrong_data[i]); + uuid_t be; + const char *data = (const char *)(test->param_value); - if (failed_tests == 0) - pr_info("all %u tests passed\n", total_tests); - else - pr_err("failed %u out of %u tests\n", failed_tests, total_tests); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, uuid_parse(data, &be), 0); +} - return failed_tests ? -EINVAL : 0; +static void case_to_desc_correct(const struct test_data *t, char *desc) +{ + strcpy(desc, t->uuid); } -module_init(test_uuid_init); -static void __exit test_uuid_exit(void) +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(correct, correct_data, case_to_desc_correct); + +static void case_to_desc_wrong(const char * const *s, char *desc) { - /* do nothing */ + strcpy(desc, *s); } -module_exit(test_uuid_exit); + +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(wrong, wrong_data, case_to_desc_wrong); + +static struct kunit_case uuid_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(uuid_correct_be, correct_gen_params), + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(uuid_correct_le, correct_gen_params), + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(uuid_wrong_be, wrong_gen_params), + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(uuid_wrong_le, wrong_gen_params), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite uuid_test_suite = { + .name = "uuid-test", + .test_cases = uuid_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(uuid_test_suite); MODULE_AUTHOR("Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com>"); MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL"); -- 2.31.1

4 years, 3 months

4
6
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/x86/syscall: use ARRAY_SIZE for msbs

by Jiapeng Chong

Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of dividing sizeof array with sizeof an element. Clean up the following coccicheck warning: ./tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c:316:35-36: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci(a)linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong(a)linux.alibaba.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c index 9915917..7d5e246 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void test_syscall_numbering(void) * The MSB is supposed to be ignored, so we loop over a few * to test that out. */ - for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(msbs)/sizeof(msbs[0]); i++) { + for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msbs); i++) { int msb = msbs[i]; run("Checking system calls with msb = %d (0x%x)\n", msb, msb); -- 1.8.3.1

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 0/3] Restore extra_mem_pages and add slot0_mem_pages

by Zhenzhong Duan

(39fe2fc96694 "selftests: kvm: make allocation of extra memory take effect") changed the meaning of extra_mem_pages and treated it as slot0 memory size. In fact extra_mem_pages is used for non-slot0 memory size, there is no custom slot0 memory size support. See discuss in https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/3/551 for more details. This patchset restores extra_mem_pages's original meaning and adds support for custom slot0 memory with a new parameter slot0_mem_pages. Run below command, all 39 tests passed. # make -C tools/testing/selftests/ TARGETS=kvm run_tests Zhenzhong Duan (3): Revert "selftests: kvm: make allocation of extra memory take effect" Revert "selftests: kvm: fix overlapping addresses in memslot_perf_test" selftests: kvm: Add support for customized slot0 memory size .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 7 +-- .../selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 47 +++++++++++++++---- .../selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

4 years, 3 months

5
9
0 0

[RFC net-next 0/2] seg6: add support for SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior

by Andrea Mayer

SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior is defined in the IETF RFC 8986 [1] along with SRv6 End.DT4 and End.DT6 Behaviors. The proposed End.DT46 implementation is meant to support the decapsulation of both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic coming from a *single* SRv6 tunnel. The SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior greatly simplifies the setup and operations of SRv6 VPNs in the Linux kernel. - patch 1/2 is the core patch that adds support for the SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior; - patch 2/2 adds the selftest for SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior. The patch introducing the new SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior in iproute2 will follow shortly. Comments, suggestions and improvements are very welcome as always! Thanks, Andrea [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8986.html#name-enddt46-decapsulation-and-s Andrea Mayer (2): seg6: add support for SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior selftests: seg6: add selftest for SRv6 End.DT46 Behavior include/uapi/linux/seg6_local.h | 2 + net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 94 ++- .../selftests/net/srv6_end_dt46_l3vpn_test.sh | 573 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 647 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_dt46_l3vpn_test.sh -- 2.20.1

4 years, 3 months

2
4
0 0

[PATCH v3 1/4] kunit: Support skipped tests

by David Gow

The kunit_mark_skipped() macro marks the current test as "skipped", with the provided reason. The kunit_skip() macro will mark the test as skipped, and abort the test. The TAP specification supports this "SKIP directive" as a comment after the "ok" / "not ok" for a test. See the "Directives" section of the TAP spec for details: https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html#directives The 'success' field for KUnit tests is replaced with a kunit_status enum, which can be SUCCESS, FAILURE, or SKIPPED, combined with a 'status_comment' containing information on why a test was skipped. A new 'kunit_status' test suite is added to test this. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> --- Changes since v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210528075932.347154-1-davidgow@go… - Make the length of the status comment a #define - Fixed a build issue where debugfs was still using the old kunit_status_to_string() function name. Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210526081112.3652290-1-davidgow@g… - Renamed kunit_status_to_string() to kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok - Fixed incorrect printing of status comments on non-skipped tests. include/kunit/test.h | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 2 +- lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++- lib/kunit/test.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index b68c61348121..fb481696c587 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ struct kunit; /* Maximum size of parameter description string. */ #define KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE 128 +/* Maximum size of a status comment. */ +#define KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE 256 + /* * TAP specifies subtest stream indentation of 4 spaces, 8 spaces for a * sub-subtest. See the "Subtests" section in @@ -105,6 +108,18 @@ struct kunit; #define KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT " " #define KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT " " +/** + * enum kunit_status - Type of result for a test or test suite + * @KUNIT_SUCCESS: Denotes the test suite has not failed nor been skipped + * @KUNIT_FAILURE: Denotes the test has failed. + * @KUNIT_SKIPPED: Denotes the test has been skipped. + */ +enum kunit_status { + KUNIT_SUCCESS, + KUNIT_FAILURE, + KUNIT_SKIPPED, +}; + /** * struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case. * @@ -148,13 +163,20 @@ struct kunit_case { const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc); /* private: internal use only. */ - bool success; + enum kunit_status status; char *log; }; -static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(bool status) +static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status) { - return status ? "ok" : "not ok"; + switch (status) { + case KUNIT_SKIPPED: + case KUNIT_SUCCESS: + return "ok"; + case KUNIT_FAILURE: + return "not ok"; + } + return "invalid"; } /** @@ -212,6 +234,7 @@ struct kunit_suite { struct kunit_case *test_cases; /* private: internal use only */ + char status_comment[KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE]; struct dentry *debugfs; char *log; }; @@ -245,19 +268,21 @@ struct kunit { * be read after the test case finishes once all threads associated * with the test case have terminated. */ - bool success; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ spinlock_t lock; /* Guards all mutable test state. */ + enum kunit_status status; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ /* * Because resources is a list that may be updated multiple times (with * new resources) from any thread associated with a test case, we must * protect it with some type of lock. */ struct list_head resources; /* Protected by lock. */ + + char status_comment[KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE]; }; static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) { - WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false); + WRITE_ONCE(test->status, KUNIT_FAILURE); } void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log); @@ -348,7 +373,7 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) #define kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) \ for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) -bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite); +enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite); /* * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource @@ -612,6 +637,42 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test); void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...); +/** + * kunit_mark_skipped() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped + * + * @test_or_suite: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Marks the test as skipped. @fmt is given output as the test status + * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped. + * + * Test execution continues after kunit_mark_skipped() is called. + */ +#define kunit_mark_skipped(test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \ + do { \ + WRITE_ONCE((test_or_suite)->status, KUNIT_SKIPPED); \ + scnprintf((test_or_suite)->status_comment, \ + KUNIT_STATUS_COMMENT_SIZE, \ + fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + } while (0) + +/** + * kunit_skip() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped + * + * @test_or_suite: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Skips the test. @fmt is given output as the test status + * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped. + * + * Test execution is halted after kunit_skip() is called. + */ +#define kunit_skip(test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \ + do { \ + kunit_mark_skipped((test_or_suite), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);\ + kunit_try_catch_throw(&((test_or_suite)->try_catch)); \ + } while (0) + /* * printk and log to per-test or per-suite log buffer. Logging only done * if CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is 'y'; if it is 'n', no log is allocated/used. diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c index 9214c493d8b7..b71db0abc12b 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case); seq_printf(seq, "%s %d - %s\n", - kunit_status_to_string(success), 1, suite->name); + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name); return 0; } diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c index 69f902440a0e..d69efcbed624 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c @@ -437,7 +437,47 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test) #endif } +static void kunit_status_set_failure_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit fake; + + kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SUCCESS); + kunit_set_failure(&fake); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_FAILURE); +} + +static void kunit_status_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit fake; + + kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL); + + /* Before: Should be SUCCESS with no comment. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, ""); + + /* Mark the test as skipped. */ + kunit_mark_skipped(&fake, "Accepts format string: %s", "YES"); + + /* After: Should be SKIPPED with our comment. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SKIPPED); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "Accepts format string: YES"); +} + +static struct kunit_case kunit_status_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_set_failure_test), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_mark_skipped_test), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite kunit_status_test_suite = { + .name = "kunit_status", + .test_cases = kunit_status_test_cases, +}; + kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite, - &kunit_log_test_suite); + &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 2f6cc0123232..8ce0c8fddb96 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -98,12 +98,14 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test, - bool is_ok, + enum kunit_status status, size_t test_number, - const char *description) + const char *description, + const char *directive) { struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite; struct kunit *test = is_test ? test_or_suite : NULL; + const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : ""; /* * We do not log the test suite results as doing so would @@ -114,25 +116,31 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite, * representation. */ if (suite) - pr_info("%s %zd - %s\n", - kunit_status_to_string(is_ok), - test_number, description); + pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n", + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), + test_number, description, directive_header, + (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""); else - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s", - kunit_status_to_string(is_ok), - test_number, description); + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s", + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), + test_number, description, directive_header, + (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""); } -bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) +enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) { const struct kunit_case *test_case; + enum kunit_status status = KUNIT_SKIPPED; kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { - if (!test_case->success) - return false; + if (test_case->status == KUNIT_FAILURE) + return KUNIT_FAILURE; + else if (test_case->status == KUNIT_SUCCESS) + status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; } - return true; + return status; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded); @@ -143,7 +151,8 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false, kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite), kunit_suite_counter++, - suite->name); + suite->name, + suite->status_comment); } unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite, @@ -252,7 +261,8 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log) test->log = log; if (test->log) test->log[0] = '\0'; - test->success = true; + test->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; + test->status_comment[0] = '\0'; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_init_test); @@ -376,7 +386,8 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite, context.test_case = test_case; kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context); - test_case->success = test->success; + test_case->status = test->status; + } int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) @@ -388,7 +399,6 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 }; - bool test_success = true; if (test_case->generate_params) { /* Get initial param. */ @@ -398,7 +408,6 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) do { kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); - test_success &= test_case->success; if (test_case->generate_params) { if (param_desc[0] == '\0') { @@ -410,7 +419,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# %s: %s %d - %s", test_case->name, - kunit_status_to_string(test.success), + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status), test.param_index + 1, param_desc); /* Get next param. */ @@ -420,9 +429,10 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) } } while (test.param_value); - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success, + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->status, kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), - test_case->name); + test_case->name, + test.status_comment); } kunit_print_subtest_end(suite); @@ -434,6 +444,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests); static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) { kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite); + suite->status_comment[0] = '\0'; } int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites) -- 2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog

4 years, 3 months

3
8
0 0

n_gsm testing

by Starke, Daniel

Hello, I plan to contribute to n_gsm for better support of 3GPP TS 27.010. Is there any test framework/suite for this module that I can use to avoid regressions? I could not find anything within the kselftest framework. And if there is nothing already available: What would be the best place for this? With best regards, Daniel Starke

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

None

by Davidlohr Bueso

Bcc: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/15] docs: locking: futex2: Add documentation Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20210603195924.361327-8-andrealmeid(a)collabora.com> On Thu, 03 Jun 2021, Andrï¿½ Almeida wrote: >Add a new documentation file specifying both userspace API and internal >implementation details of futex2 syscalls. I think equally important would be to provide a manpage for each new syscall you are introducing, and keep mkt in the loop as in the past he extensively documented and improved futex manpages, and overall has a lot of experience with dealing with kernel interfaces. Thanks, Davidlohr > >Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid(a)collabora.com> >--- > Documentation/locking/futex2.rst | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Documentation/locking/index.rst | 1 + > 2 files changed, 199 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/locking/futex2.rst > >diff --git a/Documentation/locking/futex2.rst b/Documentation/locking/futex2.rst >new file mode 100644 >index 000000000000..2f74d7c97a55 >--- /dev/null >+++ b/Documentation/locking/futex2.rst >@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ >+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >+ >+====== >+futex2 >+====== >+ >+:Author: André Almeida <andrealmeid(a)collabora.com> >+ >+futex, or fast user mutex, is a set of syscalls to allow userspace to create >+performant synchronization mechanisms, such as mutexes, semaphores and >+conditional variables in userspace. C standard libraries, like glibc, uses it >+as a means to implement more high level interfaces like pthreads. >+ >+The interface >+============= >+ >+uAPI functions >+-------------- >+ >+.. kernel-doc:: kernel/futex2.c >+ :identifiers: sys_futex_wait sys_futex_wake sys_futex_waitv sys_futex_requeue >+ >+uAPI structures >+--------------- >+ >+.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/futex.h >+ >+The ``flag`` argument >+--------------------- >+ >+The flag is used to specify the size of the futex word >+(FUTEX_[8, 16, 32, 64]). It's mandatory to define one, since there's no >+default size. >+ >+By default, the timeout uses a monotonic clock, but can be used as a realtime >+one by using the FUTEX_REALTIME_CLOCK flag. >+ >+By default, futexes are of the private type, that means that this user address >+will be accessed by threads that share the same memory region. This allows for >+some internal optimizations, so they are faster. However, if the address needs >+to be shared with different processes (like using ``mmap()`` or ``shm()``), they >+need to be defined as shared and the flag FUTEX_SHARED_FLAG is used to set that. >+ >+By default, the operation has no NUMA-awareness, meaning that the user can't >+choose the memory node where the kernel side futex data will be stored. The >+user can choose the node where it wants to operate by setting the >+FUTEX_NUMA_FLAG and using the following structure (where X can be 8, 16, 32 or >+64):: >+ >+ struct futexX_numa { >+ __uX value; >+ __sX hint; >+ }; >+ >+This structure should be passed at the ``void *uaddr`` of futex functions. The >+address of the structure will be used to be waited on/waken on, and the >+``value`` will be compared to ``val`` as usual. The ``hint`` member is used to >+define which node the futex will use. When waiting, the futex will be >+registered on a kernel-side table stored on that node; when waking, the futex >+will be searched for on that given table. That means that there's no redundancy >+between tables, and the wrong ``hint`` value will lead to undesired behavior. >+Userspace is responsible for dealing with node migrations issues that may >+occur. ``hint`` can range from [0, MAX_NUMA_NODES), for specifying a node, or >+-1, to use the same node the current process is using. >+ >+When not using FUTEX_NUMA_FLAG on a NUMA system, the futex will be stored on a >+global table on allocated on the first node. >+ >+The ``timo`` argument >+--------------------- >+ >+As per the Y2038 work done in the kernel, new interfaces shouldn't add timeout >+options known to be buggy. Given that, ``timo`` should be a 64-bit timeout at >+all platforms, using an absolute timeout value. >+ >+Implementation >+============== >+ >+The internal implementation follows a similar design to the original futex. >+Given that we want to replicate the same external behavior of current futex, >+this should be somewhat expected. >+ >+Waiting >+------- >+ >+For the wait operations, they are all treated as if you want to wait on N >+futexes, so the path for futex_wait and futex_waitv is the basically the same. >+For both syscalls, the first step is to prepare an internal list for the list >+of futexes to wait for (using struct futexv_head). For futex_wait() calls, this >+list will have a single object. >+ >+We have a hash table, where waiters register themselves before sleeping. Then >+the wake function checks this table looking for waiters at uaddr. The hash >+bucket to be used is determined by a struct futex_key, that stores information >+to uniquely identify an address from a given process. Given the huge address >+space, there'll be hash collisions, so we store information to be later used on >+collision treatment. >+ >+First, for every futex we want to wait on, we check if (``*uaddr == val``). >+This check is done holding the bucket lock, so we are correctly serialized with >+any futex_wake() calls. If any waiter fails the check above, we dequeue all >+futexes. The check (``*uaddr == val``) can fail for two reasons: >+ >+- The values are different, and we return -EAGAIN. However, if while >+ dequeueing we found that some futexes were awakened, we prioritize this >+ and return success. >+ >+- When trying to access the user address, we do so with page faults >+ disabled because we are holding a bucket's spin lock (and can't sleep >+ while holding a spin lock). If there's an error, it might be a page >+ fault, or an invalid address. We release the lock, dequeue everyone >+ (because it's illegal to sleep while there are futexes enqueued, we >+ could lose wakeups) and try again with page fault enabled. If we >+ succeed, this means that the address is valid, but we need to do >+ all the work again. For serialization reasons, we need to have the >+ spin lock when getting the user value. Additionally, for shared >+ futexes, we also need to recalculate the hash, since the underlying >+ mapping mechanisms could have changed when dealing with page fault. >+ If, even with page fault enabled, we can't access the address, it >+ means it's an invalid user address, and we return -EFAULT. For this >+ case, we prioritize the error, even if some futexes were awaken. >+ >+If the check is OK, they are enqueued on a linked list in our bucket, and >+proceed to the next one. If all waiters succeed, we put the thread to sleep >+until a futex_wake() call, timeout expires or we get a signal. After waking up, >+we dequeue everyone, and check if some futex was awakened. This dequeue is done >+by iteratively walking at each element of struct futex_head list. >+ >+All enqueuing/dequeuing operations requires to hold the bucket lock, to avoid >+racing while modifying the list. >+ >+Waking >+------ >+ >+We get the bucket that's storing the waiters at uaddr, and wake the required >+number of waiters, checking for hash collision. >+ >+There's an optimization that makes futex_wake() not take the bucket lock if >+there's no one to be woken on that bucket. It checks an atomic counter that each >+bucket has, if it says 0, then the syscall exits. In order for this to work, the >+waiter thread increases it before taking the lock, so the wake thread will >+correctly see that there's someone waiting and will continue the path to take >+the bucket lock. To get the correct serialization, the waiter issues a memory >+barrier after increasing the bucket counter and the waker issues a memory >+barrier before checking it. >+ >+Requeuing >+--------- >+ >+The requeue path first checks for each struct futex_requeue and their flags. >+Then, it will compare the expected value with the one at uaddr1::uaddr. >+Following the same serialization explained at Waking_, we increase the atomic >+counter for the bucket of uaddr2 before taking the lock. We need to have both >+buckets locks at same time so we don't race with other futex operation. To >+ensure the locks are taken in the same order for all threads (and thus avoiding >+deadlocks), every requeue operation takes the "smaller" bucket first, when >+comparing both addresses. >+ >+If the compare with user value succeeds, we proceed by waking ``nr_wake`` >+futexes, and then requeuing ``nr_requeue`` from bucket of uaddr1 to the uaddr2. >+This consists in a simple list deletion/addition and replacing the old futex key >+with the new one. >+ >+Futex keys >+---------- >+ >+There are two types of futexes: private and shared ones. The private are futexes >+meant to be used by threads that share the same memory space, are easier to be >+uniquely identified and thus can have some performance optimization. The >+elements for identifying one are: the start address of the page where the >+address is, the address offset within the page and the current->mm pointer. >+ >+Now, for uniquely identifying a shared futex: >+ >+- If the page containing the user address is an anonymous page, we can >+ just use the same data used for private futexes (the start address of >+ the page, the address offset within the page and the current->mm >+ pointer); that will be enough for uniquely identifying such futex. We >+ also set one bit at the key to differentiate if a private futex is >+ used on the same address (mixing shared and private calls does not >+ work). >+ >+- If the page is file-backed, current->mm maybe isn't the same one for >+ every user of this futex, so we need to use other data: the >+ page->index, a UUID for the struct inode and the offset within the >+ page. >+ >+Note that members of futex_key don't have any particular meaning after they >+are part of the struct - they are just bytes to identify a futex. Given that, >+we don't need to use a particular name or type that matches the original data, >+we only need to care about the bitsize of each component and make both private >+and shared fit in the same memory space. >+ >+Source code documentation >+========================= >+ >+.. kernel-doc:: kernel/futex2.c >+ :no-identifiers: sys_futex_wait sys_futex_wake sys_futex_waitv sys_futex_requeue >diff --git a/Documentation/locking/index.rst b/Documentation/locking/index.rst >index 7003bd5aeff4..9bf03c7fa1ec 100644 >--- a/Documentation/locking/index.rst >+++ b/Documentation/locking/index.rst >@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ locking > percpu-rw-semaphore > robust-futexes > robust-futex-ABI >+ futex2 > > .. only:: subproject and html > >-- >2.31.1 >

4 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Fix duplicate included pthread.h

by Jiapeng Chong

Clean up the following includecheck warning: ./tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmx-unavail.c: pthread.h is included more than once. No functional change. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci(a)linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong(a)linux.alibaba.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmx-unavail.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmx-unavail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmx-unavail.c index e2a0c07..9ef37a9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmx-unavail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmx-unavail.c @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ #include <pthread.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <unistd.h> -#include <pthread.h> #include "tm.h" #include "utils.h" -- 1.8.3.1

4 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/2] libbpf: BTF dumper support for typed data

by Alan Maguire

Add a libbpf dumper function that supports dumping a representation of data passed in using the BTF id associated with the data in a manner similar to the bpf_snprintf_btf helper. Default output format is identical to that dumped by bpf_snprintf_btf() (bar using tabs instead of spaces for indentation, but the indent string can be customized also); for example, a "struct sk_buff" representation would look like this: (struct sk_buff){ (union){ (struct){ .next = (struct sk_buff *)0xffffffffffffffff, .prev = (struct sk_buff *)0xffffffffffffffff, (union){ .dev = (struct net_device *)0xffffffffffffffff, .dev_scratch = (long unsigned int)18446744073709551615, }, }, ... Patch 1 implements the dump functionality in a manner similar to that in kernel/bpf/btf.c, but with a view to fitting into libbpf more naturally. For example, rather than using flags, boolean dump options are used to control output. In addition, rather than combining checks for display (such as is this field zero?) and actual display - as is done for the kernel code - the code is organized to separate zero and overflow checks from type display. Patch 2 consists of selftests that utilize a dump printf function to snprintf the dump output to a string for comparison with expected output. Tests deliberately mirror those in snprintf_btf helper test to keep output consistent, but also cover overflow handling, var/section display. Changes since v3 [1] - Retained separation of emitting of type name cast prefixing type values from existing functionality such as btf_dump_emit_type_chain() since initial code-shared version had so many exceptions it became hard to read. For example, we don't emit a type name if the type to be displayed is an array member, we also always emit "forward" definitions for structs/unions that aren't really forward definitions (we just want a "struct foo" output for "(struct foo){.bar = ...". We also always ignore modifiers const/volatile/restrict as they clutter output when emitting large types. - Added configurable 4-char indent string option; defaults to tab (Andrii) - Added support for BTF_KIND_FLOAT and associated tests (Andrii) - Added support for BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO function pointers to improve output of "ops" structures; for example: (struct file_operations){ .owner = (struct module *)0xffffffffffffffff, .llseek = (loff_t(*)(struct file *, loff_t, int))0xffffffffffffffff, ... Added associated test also (Andrii) - Added handling for enum bitfields and associated test (Andrii) - Allocation of "struct btf_dump_data" done on-demand (Andrii) - Removed ".field = " output from function emitting type name and into caller (Andrii) - Removed BTF_INT_OFFSET() support (Andrii) - Use libbpf_err() to set errno for error cases (Andrii) - btf_dump_dump_type_data() returns size written, which is used when returning successfully from btf_dump__dump_type_data() (Andrii) Changes since v2 [2] - Renamed function to btf_dump__dump_type_data, reorganized arguments such that opts are last (Andrii) - Modified code to separate questions about display such as have we overflowed?/is this field zero? from actual display of typed data, such that we ask those questions separately from the code that actually displays typed data (Andrii) - Reworked code to handle overflow - where we do not provide enough data for the type we wish to display - by returning -E2BIG and attempting to present as much data as possible. Such a mode of operation allows for tracers which retrieve partial data (such as first 1024 bytes of a "struct task_struct" say), and want to display that partial data, while also knowing that it is not the full type. Such tracers can then denote this (perhaps via "..." or similar). - Explored reusing existing type emit functions, such as passing in a type id stack with a single type id to btf_dump_emit_type_chain() to support the display of typed data where a "cast" is prepended to the data to denote its type; "(int)1", "(struct foo){", etc. However the task of emitting a ".field_name = (typecast)" did not match well with model of walking the stack to display innermost types first and made the resultant code harder to read. Added a dedicated btf_dump_emit_type_name() function instead which is only ~70 lines (Andrii) - Various cleanups around bitfield macros, unneeded member iteration macros, avoiding compiler complaints when displaying int da ta by casting to long long, etc (Andrii) - Use DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS() in defining opts for tests (Andrii) - Added more type tests, overflow tests, var tests and section tests. Changes since RFC [3] - The initial approach explored was to share the kernel code with libbpf using #defines to paper over the different needs; however it makes more sense to try and fit in with libbpf code style for maintenance. A comment in the code points at the implementation in kernel/bpf/btf.c and notes that any issues found in it should be fixed there or vice versa; mirroring the tests should help with this also (Andrii) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1622131170-8260-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@o… [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1610921764-7526-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@o… [3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1610386373-24162-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@… Alan Maguire (2): libbpf: BTF dumper support for typed data selftests/bpf: add dump type data tests to btf dump tests tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 22 + tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 1008 ++++++++++++++++++++- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 638 +++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 1667 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1

4 years, 3 months

2
4
0 0

[PATCH v2 1/4] kunit: Support skipped tests

by David Gow

The kunit_mark_skipped() macro marks the current test as "skipped", with the provided reason. The kunit_skip() macro will mark the test as skipped, and abort the test. The TAP specification supports this "SKIP directive" as a comment after the "ok" / "not ok" for a test. See the "Directives" section of the TAP spec for details: https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html#directives The 'success' field for KUnit tests is replaced with a kunit_status enum, which can be SUCCESS, FAILURE, or SKIPPED, combined with a 'status_comment' containing information on why a test was skipped. A new 'kunit_status' test suite is added to test this. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> --- Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210526081112.3652290-1-davidgow@g… - Renamed kunit_status_to_string() to kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok - Fixed incorrect printing of status comments on non-skipped tests. Not changes: - Still using kunit_log(KERN_INFO,...) instead of kunit_info() as it seems to be consistently used for printing results in the KUnit code. include/kunit/test.h | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- lib/kunit/test.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++------------- 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index b68c61348121..1401c620ac5e 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -105,6 +105,18 @@ struct kunit; #define KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT " " #define KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT " " +/** + * enum kunit_status - Type of result for a test or test suite + * @KUNIT_SUCCESS: Denotes the test suite has not failed nor been skipped + * @KUNIT_FAILURE: Denotes the test has failed. + * @KUNIT_SKIPPED: Denotes the test has been skipped. + */ +enum kunit_status { + KUNIT_SUCCESS, + KUNIT_FAILURE, + KUNIT_SKIPPED, +}; + /** * struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case. * @@ -148,13 +160,20 @@ struct kunit_case { const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc); /* private: internal use only. */ - bool success; + enum kunit_status status; char *log; }; -static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(bool status) +static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status) { - return status ? "ok" : "not ok"; + switch (status) { + case KUNIT_SKIPPED: + case KUNIT_SUCCESS: + return "ok"; + case KUNIT_FAILURE: + return "not ok"; + } + return "invalid"; } /** @@ -212,6 +231,7 @@ struct kunit_suite { struct kunit_case *test_cases; /* private: internal use only */ + char status_comment[256]; struct dentry *debugfs; char *log; }; @@ -245,19 +265,21 @@ struct kunit { * be read after the test case finishes once all threads associated * with the test case have terminated. */ - bool success; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ spinlock_t lock; /* Guards all mutable test state. */ + enum kunit_status status; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ /* * Because resources is a list that may be updated multiple times (with * new resources) from any thread associated with a test case, we must * protect it with some type of lock. */ struct list_head resources; /* Protected by lock. */ + + char status_comment[256]; }; static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) { - WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false); + WRITE_ONCE(test->status, KUNIT_FAILURE); } void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log); @@ -348,7 +370,7 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) #define kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) \ for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) -bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite); +enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite); /* * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource @@ -612,6 +634,40 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test); void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...); +/** + * kunit_mark_skipped() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped + * + * @test_or_suite: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Marks the test as skipped. @fmt is given output as the test status + * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped. + * + * Test execution continues after kunit_mark_skipped() is called. + */ +#define kunit_mark_skipped(test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \ + do { \ + WRITE_ONCE((test_or_suite)->status, KUNIT_SKIPPED); \ + scnprintf((test_or_suite)->status_comment, 256, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + } while (0) + +/** + * kunit_skip() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped + * + * @test_or_suite: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Skips the test. @fmt is given output as the test status + * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped. + * + * Test execution is halted after kunit_skip() is called. + */ +#define kunit_skip(test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \ + do { \ + kunit_mark_skipped((test_or_suite), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);\ + kunit_try_catch_throw(&((test_or_suite)->try_catch)); \ + } while (0) + /* * printk and log to per-test or per-suite log buffer. Logging only done * if CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is 'y'; if it is 'n', no log is allocated/used. diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c index 69f902440a0e..d69efcbed624 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c @@ -437,7 +437,47 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test) #endif } +static void kunit_status_set_failure_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit fake; + + kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SUCCESS); + kunit_set_failure(&fake); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_FAILURE); +} + +static void kunit_status_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit fake; + + kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL); + + /* Before: Should be SUCCESS with no comment. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, ""); + + /* Mark the test as skipped. */ + kunit_mark_skipped(&fake, "Accepts format string: %s", "YES"); + + /* After: Should be SKIPPED with our comment. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SKIPPED); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "Accepts format string: YES"); +} + +static struct kunit_case kunit_status_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_set_failure_test), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_mark_skipped_test), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite kunit_status_test_suite = { + .name = "kunit_status", + .test_cases = kunit_status_test_cases, +}; + kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite, - &kunit_log_test_suite); + &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 2f6cc0123232..8ce0c8fddb96 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -98,12 +98,14 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test, - bool is_ok, + enum kunit_status status, size_t test_number, - const char *description) + const char *description, + const char *directive) { struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite; struct kunit *test = is_test ? test_or_suite : NULL; + const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : ""; /* * We do not log the test suite results as doing so would @@ -114,25 +116,31 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite, * representation. */ if (suite) - pr_info("%s %zd - %s\n", - kunit_status_to_string(is_ok), - test_number, description); + pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n", + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), + test_number, description, directive_header, + (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""); else - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s", - kunit_status_to_string(is_ok), - test_number, description); + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s", + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), + test_number, description, directive_header, + (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""); } -bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) +enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) { const struct kunit_case *test_case; + enum kunit_status status = KUNIT_SKIPPED; kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { - if (!test_case->success) - return false; + if (test_case->status == KUNIT_FAILURE) + return KUNIT_FAILURE; + else if (test_case->status == KUNIT_SUCCESS) + status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; } - return true; + return status; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded); @@ -143,7 +151,8 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false, kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite), kunit_suite_counter++, - suite->name); + suite->name, + suite->status_comment); } unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite, @@ -252,7 +261,8 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log) test->log = log; if (test->log) test->log[0] = '\0'; - test->success = true; + test->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; + test->status_comment[0] = '\0'; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_init_test); @@ -376,7 +386,8 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite, context.test_case = test_case; kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context); - test_case->success = test->success; + test_case->status = test->status; + } int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) @@ -388,7 +399,6 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 }; - bool test_success = true; if (test_case->generate_params) { /* Get initial param. */ @@ -398,7 +408,6 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) do { kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); - test_success &= test_case->success; if (test_case->generate_params) { if (param_desc[0] == '\0') { @@ -410,7 +419,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# %s: %s %d - %s", test_case->name, - kunit_status_to_string(test.success), + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status), test.param_index + 1, param_desc); /* Get next param. */ @@ -420,9 +429,10 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) } } while (test.param_value); - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success, + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->status, kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), - test_case->name); + test_case->name, + test.status_comment); } kunit_print_subtest_end(suite); @@ -434,6 +444,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests); static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) { kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite); + suite->status_comment[0] = '\0'; } int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites) -- 2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog

4 years, 3 months

5
11
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror