June 2024 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH RFT v6 0/9] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3()

by Mark Brown

The kernel has recently added support for shadow stacks, currently x86 only using their CET feature but both arm64 and RISC-V have equivalent features (GCS and Zicfiss respectively), I am actively working on GCS[1]. With shadow stacks the hardware maintains an additional stack containing only the return addresses for branch instructions which is not generally writeable by userspace and ensures that any returns are to the recorded addresses. This provides some protection against ROP attacks and making it easier to collect call stacks. These shadow stacks are allocated in the address space of the userspace process. Our API for shadow stacks does not currently offer userspace any flexiblity for managing the allocation of shadow stacks for newly created threads, instead the kernel allocates a new shadow stack with the same size as the normal stack whenever a thread is created with the feature enabled. The stacks allocated in this way are freed by the kernel when the thread exits or shadow stacks are disabled for the thread. This lack of flexibility and control isn't ideal, in the vast majority of cases the shadow stack will be over allocated and the implicit allocation and deallocation is not consistent with other interfaces. As far as I can tell the interface is done in this manner mainly because the shadow stack patches were in development since before clone3() was implemented. Since clone3() is readily extensible let's add support for specifying a shadow stack when creating a new thread or process in a similar manner to how the normal stack is specified, keeping the current implicit allocation behaviour if one is not specified either with clone3() or through the use of clone(). The user must provide a shadow stack address and size, this must point to memory mapped for use as a shadow stackby map_shadow_stack() with a shadow stack token at the top of the stack. Please note that the x86 portions of this code are build tested only, I don't appear to have a system that can run CET avaible to me, I have done testing with an integration into my pending work for GCS. There is some possibility that the arm64 implementation may require the use of clone3() and explicit userspace allocation of shadow stacks, this is still under discussion. Please further note that the token consumption done by clone3() is not currently implemented in an atomic fashion, Rick indicated that he would look into fixing this if people are OK with the implementation. A new architecture feature Kconfig option for shadow stacks is added as here, this was suggested as part of the review comments for the arm64 GCS series and since we need to detect if shadow stacks are supported it seemed sensible to roll it in here. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009-arm64-gcs-v6-0-78e55deaa4dd@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> --- Changes in v6: - Rebase onto v6.10-rc3. - Ensure we don't try to free the parent shadow stack in error paths of x86 arch code. - Spelling fixes in userspace API document. - Additional cleanups and improvements to the clone3() tests to support the shadow stack tests. - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240203-clone3-shadow-stack-v5-0-322c69598e4b@ke… Changes in v5: - Rebase onto v6.8-rc2. - Rework ABI to have the user allocate the shadow stack memory with map_shadow_stack() and a token. - Force inlining of the x86 shadow stack enablement. - Move shadow stack enablement out into a shared header for reuse by other tests. - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231128-clone3-shadow-stack-v4-0-8b28ffe4f676@ke… Changes in v4: - Formatting changes. - Use a define for minimum shadow stack size and move some basic validation to fork.c. - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120-clone3-shadow-stack-v3-0-a7b8ed3e2acc@ke… Changes in v3: - Rebase onto v6.7-rc2. - Remove stale shadow_stack in internal kargs. - If a shadow stack is specified unconditionally use it regardless of CLONE_ parameters. - Force enable shadow stacks in the selftest. - Update changelogs for RISC-V feature rename. - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114-clone3-shadow-stack-v2-0-b613f8681155@ke… Changes in v2: - Rebase onto v6.7-rc1. - Remove ability to provide preallocated shadow stack, just specify the desired size. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023-clone3-shadow-stack-v1-0-d867d0b5d4d0@ke… --- Mark Brown (9): Documentation: userspace-api: Add shadow stack API documentation selftests: Provide helper header for shadow stack testing mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3() selftests/clone3: Remove redundant flushes of output streams selftests/clone3: Factor more of main loop into test_clone3() selftests/clone3: Explicitly handle child exits due to signals selftests/clone3: Allow tests to flag if -E2BIG is a valid error code selftests/clone3: Test shadow stack support Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/userspace-api/shadow_stack.rst | 41 ++++ arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h | 11 +- arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c | 104 +++++++--- fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +- include/linux/mm.h | 2 +- include/linux/sched/task.h | 13 ++ include/uapi/linux/sched.h | 13 +- kernel/fork.c | 76 ++++++-- mm/Kconfig | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++---- tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_selftests.h | 40 +++- tools/testing/selftests/ksft_shstk.h | 63 ++++++ 15 files changed, 512 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 83a7eefedc9b56fe7bfeff13b6c7356688ffa670 change-id: 20231019-clone3-shadow-stack-15d40d2bf536 Best regards, -- Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org>

8 months, 3 weeks

3
11
0 0

[PATCH-cgroup v2 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: Fix miscellaneous issues

by Waiman Long

v2: - Fix test_cpuset_prs.sh problems reported by test robot - Relax restriction imposed between cpuset.cpus.exclusive and cpuset.cpus of sibling cpusets. - Make cpuset.cpus.exclusive independent of cpuset.cpus. - Update test_cpuset_prs.sh accordingly. [v1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240605171858.1323464-1-longman@redhat.com/ This patchset attempts to address the following cpuset issues. 1) While reviewing the generate_sched_domains() function, I found a bug in generating sched domains for remote non-isolating partitions. 2) Test robot had reported a test_cpuset_prs.sh test failure. 3) The current exclusivity test between cpuset.cpus.exclusive and cpuset.cpus and the restriction that the set effective exclusive CPUs has to be a subset of cpuset.cpus make it harder to preconfigure the cgroup hierarchy to enable remote partition. The test_cpuset_prs.sh script is updated to match changes made in this patchset and was run to verify that the new code did not cause any regression. Waiman Long (5): cgroup/cpuset: Fix remote root partition creation problem selftest/cgroup: Fix test_cpuset_prs.sh problems reported by test robot cgroup/cpuset: Delay setting of CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE until valid partition cgroup/cpuset: Make cpuset.cpus.exclusive independent of cpuset.cpus selftest/cgroup: Update test_cpuset_prs.sh to match changes Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 12 +- kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 158 +++++++++++++----- .../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 75 ++++++--- 3 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) -- 2.39.3

8 months, 3 weeks

3
8
0 0

[PATCH net-next v1 0/3] selftests: rds selftest

by allison.henderson＠oracle.com

From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson(a)oracle.com> Hi All, This series is a new selftest that Vegard, Chuck and myself have been working on to provide some test coverage for rds. I've made quite a few updates since the rfc sent a few weeks ago: I've added several knobs to the script to tune network turbulance, and documented their usage in the README.txt. By default these options are left off. Added an extra flag to specify log location I've also added a flag to the config.sh to skip gcov configurations if the coverage report is not desired. run.sh has been adapted to skip the report if the required configs are not present, or if the required packages are not available A time out has been added to prevent the test from hanging indefinitely The previous gcov issues have been resolved with an appropriate gcov patch, as well as some extra logic to detect incompatible gcov and gcc versions. The shellcheck nits reported in the last review have been addressed In order to return an appropriate exit code, the run.sh script has been adapted to analyze the test.py strace, and determine if the test passed, failed or timed out. RDS specific GCOV configs have been documented under Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst Questions and comments appreciated. Thanks everyone! Allison Vegard Nossum (3): .gitignore: add .gcda files net: rds: add option for GCOV profiling selftests: rds: add testing infrastructure .gitignore | 1 + Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst | 11 + MAINTAINERS | 1 + net/rds/Kconfig | 9 + net/rds/Makefile | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/Makefile | 13 + tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/README.txt | 41 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/config.sh | 56 +++++ tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/init.sh | 69 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/run.sh | 271 +++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/test.py | 251 +++++++++++++++++++ 12 files changed, 729 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/README.txt create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/config.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/init.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/run.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/test.py -- 2.25.1

9 months

3
6
0 0

[PATCH v2] selftests: x86: conform test to TAP format output

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- Changes since v1: - No changes, sending it again as got no response on v1 even after weeks --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c | 29 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c index fe99f24341554..f621167424a9c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/vdso_restorer.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <syscall.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> +#include "../kselftest.h" /* Open-code this -- the headers are too messy to easily use them. */ struct real_sigaction { @@ -44,17 +45,19 @@ static void handler_without_siginfo(int sig) int main() { - int nerrs = 0; struct real_sigaction sa; + ksft_print_header(); + ksft_set_plan(2); + void *vdso = dlopen("linux-vdso.so.1", RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_LOCAL | RTLD_NOLOAD); if (!vdso) vdso = dlopen("linux-gate.so.1", RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_LOCAL | RTLD_NOLOAD); if (!vdso) { - printf("[SKIP]\tFailed to find vDSO. Tests are not expected to work.\n"); - return 0; + ksft_print_msg("[SKIP]\tFailed to find vDSO. Tests are not expected to work.\n"); + return KSFT_SKIP; } memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa)); @@ -62,21 +65,16 @@ int main() sa.flags = SA_SIGINFO; sa.restorer = NULL; /* request kernel-provided restorer */ - printf("[RUN]\tRaise a signal, SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Raise a signal, SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL\n"); if (syscall(SYS_rt_sigaction, SIGUSR1, &sa, NULL, 8) != 0) err(1, "raw rt_sigaction syscall"); raise(SIGUSR1); - if (handler_called) { - printf("[OK]\tSA_SIGINFO handler returned successfully\n"); - } else { - printf("[FAIL]\tSA_SIGINFO handler was not called\n"); - nerrs++; - } + ksft_test_result(handler_called, "SA_SIGINFO handler returned\n"); - printf("[RUN]\tRaise a signal, !SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Raise a signal, !SA_SIGINFO, sa.restorer == NULL\n"); sa.flags = 0; sa.handler = handler_without_siginfo; @@ -86,10 +84,7 @@ int main() raise(SIGUSR1); - if (handler_called) { - printf("[OK]\t!SA_SIGINFO handler returned successfully\n"); - } else { - printf("[FAIL]\t!SA_SIGINFO handler was not called\n"); - nerrs++; - } + ksft_test_result(handler_called, "SA_SIGINFO handler returned\n"); + + ksft_finished(); } -- 2.39.2

9 months

2
7
0 0

[PATCH v2 0/4] add tests to verify IFS (In Field Scan) driver functionality

by Pengfei Xu

To verify IFS (In Field Scan [1]) driver functionality, add the following 6 test cases: 1. Verify that IFS sysfs entries are created after loading the IFS module 2. Check if loading an invalid IFS test image fails and loading a valid one succeeds 3. Perform IFS scan test on each CPU using all the available image files 4. Perform IFS scan with first test image file on a random CPU for 3 rounds 5. Perform IFS ARRAY BIST(Board Integrated System Test) test on each CPU 6. Perform IFS ARRAY BIST test on a random CPU for 3 rounds These are not exhaustive, but some minimal test runs to check various parts of the driver. Some negative tests are also included. [1] https://docs.kernel.org/arch/x86/ifs.html Pengfei Xu (4): selftests: ifs: verify test interfaces are created by the driver selftests: ifs: verify test image loading functionality selftests: ifs: verify IFS scan test functionality selftests: ifs: verify IFS ARRAY BIST functionality MAINTAINERS | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + .../drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/Makefile | 6 + .../platform/x86/intel/ifs/test_ifs.sh | 494 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 502 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/Makefile create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/test_ifs.sh --- Changes: v1 to v2: - Rebase to v6.10 cycle kernel and resolve some code conflicts - Improved checking of IFS ARRAY_BIST support by leveraging sysfs entry methods (suggested by Ashok) -- 2.43.0

9 months

3
7
0 0

[PATCH 1/2] selftests: arm64: tags_test: conform test to TAP output

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c index 955f87c1170d7..8ae26e496c89c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c @@ -17,19 +17,21 @@ int main(void) static int tbi_enabled = 0; unsigned long tag = 0; struct utsname *ptr; - int err; + + ksft_print_header(); + ksft_set_plan(1); if (prctl(PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE, 0, 0, 0) == 0) tbi_enabled = 1; ptr = (struct utsname *)malloc(sizeof(*ptr)); if (!ptr) - ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to allocate utsname buffer\n"); + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Failed to allocate utsname buffer"); if (tbi_enabled) tag = 0x42; ptr = (struct utsname *)SET_TAG(ptr, tag); - err = uname(ptr); + ksft_test_result(!uname(ptr), "Syscall successful with tagged address\n"); free(ptr); - return err; + ksft_finished(); } -- 2.39.2

9 months

3
7
0 0

[PATCH 0/4] selftest: x86: conform tests to TAP format output

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

In this series, 4 tests are being conformed to TAP. Muhammad Usama Anjum (4): selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state: conform test to TAP format output selftests: x86: corrupt_xstate_header: conform test to TAP format output selftests: fsgsbase_restore: conform test to TAP format output selftests: entry_from_vm86: conform test to TAP format output .../selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c | 24 ++-- .../selftests/x86/corrupt_xstate_header.c | 30 +++-- tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 109 ++++++++-------- .../testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase_restore.c | 117 +++++++++--------- 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-) -- 2.39.2

9 months

2
13
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: openat2: don't print total number of tests and then skip

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Don't print that 88 sub-tests are going to be executed. But then skip. The error is printed that executed test was only 1 while 88 should have run: Old output: TAP version 13 1..88 ok 2 # SKIP all tests require euid == 0 # Planned tests != run tests (88 != 1) # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:1 error:0 New and correct output: TAP version 13 1..0 # SKIP all tests require euid == 0 Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c index bbafad440893c..5472ec478d227 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c @@ -508,12 +508,13 @@ void test_openat2_opath_tests(void) int main(int argc, char **argv) { ksft_print_header(); - ksft_set_plan(NUM_TESTS); /* NOTE: We should be checking for CAP_SYS_ADMIN here... */ - if (geteuid() != 0) + if (geteuid()) ksft_exit_skip("all tests require euid == 0\n"); + ksft_set_plan(NUM_TESTS); + test_openat2_opath_tests(); if (ksft_get_fail_cnt() + ksft_get_error_cnt() > 0) -- 2.39.2

9 months

3
6
0 0

[PATCH 1/2] selftests/thermel/intel: conform the test to TAP output

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- .../intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c | 98 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c index 217c3a641c537..d107c2d6f3a22 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/thermal/intel/workload_hint/workload_hint_test.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <fcntl.h> #include <poll.h> #include <signal.h> +#include "../../../kselftest.h" #define WORKLOAD_NOTIFICATION_DELAY_ATTRIBUTE "/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/workload_hint/notification_delay_ms" #define WORKLOAD_ENABLE_ATTRIBUTE "/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/workload_hint/workload_hint_enable" @@ -31,17 +32,13 @@ void workload_hint_exit(int signum) /* Disable feature via sysfs knob */ fd = open(WORKLOAD_ENABLE_ATTRIBUTE, O_RDWR); - if (fd < 0) { - perror("Unable to open workload type feature enable file\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (fd < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Unable to open workload type feature enable file"); - if (write(fd, "0\n", 2) < 0) { - perror("Can' disable workload hints\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (write(fd, "0\n", 2) < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Can' disable workload hints"); - printf("Disabled workload type prediction\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Disabled workload type prediction\n"); close(fd); } @@ -54,32 +51,27 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) char delay_str[64]; int delay = 0; - printf("Usage: workload_hint_test [notification delay in milli seconds]\n"); + ksft_print_header(); + ksft_set_plan(1); + + ksft_print_msg("Usage: workload_hint_test [notification delay in milli seconds]\n"); if (argc > 1) { ret = sscanf(argv[1], "%d", &delay); - if (ret < 0) { - printf("Invalid delay\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (ret < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Invalid delay"); - printf("Setting notification delay to %d ms\n", delay); + ksft_print_msg("Setting notification delay to %d ms\n", delay); if (delay < 0) - exit(1); - - sprintf(delay_str, "%s\n", argv[1]); + ksft_exit_fail_msg("delay can never be negative\n"); sprintf(delay_str, "%s\n", argv[1]); fd = open(WORKLOAD_NOTIFICATION_DELAY_ATTRIBUTE, O_RDWR); - if (fd < 0) { - perror("Unable to open workload notification delay\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (fd < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Unable to open workload notification delay"); - if (write(fd, delay_str, strlen(delay_str)) < 0) { - perror("Can't set delay\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (write(fd, delay_str, strlen(delay_str)) < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Can't set delay"); close(fd); } @@ -93,63 +85,51 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) /* Enable feature via sysfs knob */ fd = open(WORKLOAD_ENABLE_ATTRIBUTE, O_RDWR); - if (fd < 0) { - perror("Unable to open workload type feature enable file\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (fd < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Unable to open workload type feature enable file"); - if (write(fd, "1\n", 2) < 0) { - perror("Can' enable workload hints\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (write(fd, "1\n", 2) < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Can' enable workload hints"); close(fd); - printf("Enabled workload type prediction\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Enabled workload type prediction\n"); while (1) { fd = open(WORKLOAD_TYPE_INDEX_ATTRIBUTE, O_RDONLY); - if (fd < 0) { - perror("Unable to open workload type file\n"); - exit(1); - } + if (fd < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Unable to open workload type file"); - if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) { - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set pointer to beginning\n"); - exit(1); - } + if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Failed to set pointer to beginning"); - if (read(fd, index_str, sizeof(index_str)) < 0) { - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to read from:%s\n", - WORKLOAD_TYPE_INDEX_ATTRIBUTE); - exit(1); - } + if (read(fd, index_str, sizeof(index_str)) < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Failed to read from: workload_type_index"); ufd.fd = fd; ufd.events = POLLPRI; ret = poll(&ufd, 1, -1); if (ret < 0) { - perror("poll error"); - exit(1); + ksft_exit_fail_perror("poll error"); } else if (ret == 0) { - printf("Poll Timeout\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Poll Timeout\n"); } else { - if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) { - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set pointer to beginning\n"); - exit(1); - } + if ((lseek(fd, 0L, SEEK_SET)) < 0) + ksft_exit_fail_perror("Failed to set pointer to beginning"); - if (read(fd, index_str, sizeof(index_str)) < 0) - exit(0); + if (read(fd, index_str, sizeof(index_str)) < 0) { + ksft_test_result_pass("Successfully read\n"); + ksft_finished(); + } ret = sscanf(index_str, "%d", &index); if (ret < 0) break; if (index > WORKLOAD_TYPE_MAX_INDEX) - printf("Invalid workload type index\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Invalid workload type index\n"); else - printf("workload type:%s\n", workload_types[index]); + ksft_print_msg("workload type:%s\n", workload_types[index]); } close(fd); -- 2.39.2

9 months

3
5
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: firmware: conform test to TAP

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages. Without using TAP messages, the passed/failed/skip test names cannot be found. This is a prepartory patch, more patches will be sent to comform the test completely. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- .../selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh | 63 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh index f6d95a2d51249..5063c75345680 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ set -e +DIR="$(dirname $(readlink -f "$0"))" +source "${DIR}"/../kselftest/ktap_helpers.sh + TEST_DIR=$(dirname $0) source $TEST_DIR/fw_lib.sh @@ -26,54 +29,68 @@ run_tests() proc_set_force_sysfs_fallback $1 proc_set_ignore_sysfs_fallback $2 $TEST_DIR/fw_upload.sh + + ktap_test_pass "Completed" } run_test_config_0001() { - echo "-----------------------------------------------------" - echo "Running kernel configuration test 1 -- rare" - echo "Emulates:" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK=n" + ktap_print_msg "-----------------------------------------------------" + ktap_print_msg "Running kernel configuration test 1 -- rare" + ktap_print_msg "Emulates:" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK=n" run_tests 0 1 } run_test_config_0002() { - echo "-----------------------------------------------------" - echo "Running kernel configuration test 2 -- distro" - echo "Emulates:" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=y" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK=n" + ktap_print_msg "-----------------------------------------------------" + ktap_print_msg "Running kernel configuration test 2 -- distro" + ktap_print_msg "Emulates:" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=y" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK=n" proc_set_ignore_sysfs_fallback 0 run_tests 0 0 } run_test_config_0003() { - echo "-----------------------------------------------------" - echo "Running kernel configuration test 3 -- android" - echo "Emulates:" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=y" - echo "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK=y" + ktap_print_msg "-----------------------------------------------------" + ktap_print_msg "Running kernel configuration test 3 -- android" + ktap_print_msg "Emulates:" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=y" + ktap_print_msg "CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK=y" run_tests 1 0 } +ktap_print_header + check_mods check_setup -echo "Running namespace test: " -$TEST_DIR/fw_namespace $DIR/trigger_request -echo "OK" - if [ -f $FW_FORCE_SYSFS_FALLBACK ]; then + ktap_set_plan "4" + run_test_config_0001 run_test_config_0002 run_test_config_0003 else - echo "Running basic kernel configuration, working with your config" + ktap_set_plan "2" + + ktap_print_msg "Running basic kernel configuration, working with your config" run_tests fi + +ktap_print_msg "Running namespace test: " +$TEST_DIR/fw_namespace $DIR/trigger_request +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then + ktap_test_pass "fw_namespace completed successfully" +else + ktap_test_fail "fw_namespace failed" +fi + +ktap_finished -- 2.39.2

9 months

2
2
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror June 2024