April 2024 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] export send_recv_data

by Geliang Tang

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang(a)kylinos.cn> v4: - fix a bug in v3, it should be 'if (err)', not 'if (!err)'. - move "selftests/bpf: Use log_err in network_helpers" out of this series. v3: - add two more patches. - use log_err instead of ASSERT in v3. - let send_recv_data return int as Martin suggested. v2: Address Martin's comments for v1 (thanks.) - drop patch 1, "export send_byte helper". - drop "WRITE_ONCE(arg.stop, 0)". - rebased. send_recv_data will be re-used in MPTCP bpf tests, but not included in this set because it depends on other patches that have not been in the bpf-next yet. It will be sent as another set soon. Geliang Tang (3): selftests/bpf: Add struct send_recv_arg selftests/bpf: Export send_recv_data helper selftests/bpf: Support nonblock for send_recv_data tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 71 +----------- 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) -- 2.40.1

1 year, 5 months

2
6
0 0

[PATCH v2] selftests: exec: make binaries position independent

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

The -static overrides the -pie and binaries aren't position independent anymore. Use -static-pie instead which would produce a static and position independent binary. This has been caught by clang's warnings: clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-pie' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] Tested with both gcc and clang after this change. Fixes: 4d1cd3b2c5c1 ("tools/testing/selftests/exec: fix link error") Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- Changes since v1: - Remove unneeded comment --- tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile index fb4472ddffd81..3c79ec9bf780f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ $(OUTPUT)/execveat.denatured: $(OUTPUT)/execveat cp $< $@ chmod -x $@ $(OUTPUT)/load_address_4096: load_address.c - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-z,max-page-size=0x1000 -pie -static $< -o $@ + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-z,max-page-size=0x1000 -static-pie $< -o $@ $(OUTPUT)/load_address_2097152: load_address.c - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-z,max-page-size=0x200000 -pie -static $< -o $@ + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-z,max-page-size=0x200000 -static-pie $< -o $@ $(OUTPUT)/load_address_16777216: load_address.c - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-z,max-page-size=0x1000000 -pie -static $< -o $@ + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-z,max-page-size=0x1000000 -static-pie $< -o $@ -- 2.39.2

1 year, 5 months

4
5
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: Move test_dev_cgroup to prog_tests

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

Move test_dev_cgroup.c to prog_tests/dev_cgroup.c to be able to run it with test_progs. Replace dev_cgroup.bpf.o with skel header file, dev_cgroup.skel.h and load program from it accourdingly. ./test_progs -t dev_cgroup mknod: /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null: Operation not permitted 64+0 records in 64+0 records out 32768 bytes (33 kB, 32 KiB) copied, 0.000856684 s, 38.2 MB/s dd: failed to open '/dev/full': Operation not permitted dd: failed to open '/dev/random': Operation not permitted #72 test_dev_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- Changes since v2: - Replace test_dev_cgroup with serial_test_dev_cgroup as there is probability that the test is racing against another cgroup test - Minor changes to the commit message above I've tested the patch with vmtest.sh on bpf-next/for-next and linux next. It is passing on both. Not sure why it was failed on BPFCI. Test run with vmtest.h: sudo LDLIBS=-static PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config --static' ./vmtest.sh ./test_progs -t dev_cgroup ./test_progs -t dev_cgroup mknod: /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null: Operation not permitted 64+0 records in 64+0 records out 32768 bytes (33 kB, 32 KiB) copied, 0.000403432 s, 81.2 MB/s dd: failed to open '/dev/full': Operation not permitted dd: failed to open '/dev/random': Operation not permitted #69 dev_cgroup:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Changes since v1: - Rename file from test_dev_cgroup.c to dev_cgroup.c - Use ASSERT_* in-place of CHECK --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dev_cgroup.c | 58 +++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c | 85 ------------------- 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dev_cgroup.c delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dev_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dev_cgroup.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..da0bc209d6a21 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dev_cgroup.c @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* Copyright (c) 2017 Facebook + */ + +#include <test_progs.h> +#include <time.h> +#include "cgroup_helpers.h" +#include "dev_cgroup.skel.h" + +#define TEST_CGROUP "/test-bpf-based-device-cgroup/" + +void serial_test_dev_cgroup(void) +{ + struct dev_cgroup *skel; + int cgroup_fd, err; + __u32 prog_cnt; + + skel = dev_cgroup__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_and_load")) + goto cleanup; + + cgroup_fd = cgroup_setup_and_join(TEST_CGROUP); + if (!ASSERT_GT(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_setup_and_join")) + goto cleanup; + + err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bpf_prog1), cgroup_fd, + BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE, 0); + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "bpf_attach")) + goto cleanup; + + err = bpf_prog_query(cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE, 0, NULL, NULL, &prog_cnt); + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "bpf_query") || (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_cnt, 1, "bpf_query"))) + goto cleanup; + + /* All operations with /dev/zero and /dev/urandom are allowed, + * everything else is forbidden. + */ + ASSERT_EQ(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null"), 0, "rm"); + ASSERT_NEQ(system("mknod /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null c 1 3"), 0, "mknod"); + ASSERT_EQ(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null"), 0, "rm"); + + /* /dev/zero is whitelisted */ + ASSERT_EQ(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero"), 0, "rm"); + ASSERT_EQ(system("mknod /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero c 1 5"), 0, "mknod"); + ASSERT_EQ(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero"), 0, "rm"); + + ASSERT_EQ(system("dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/zero count=64"), 0, "dd"); + + /* src is allowed, target is forbidden */ + ASSERT_NEQ(system("dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/full count=64"), 0, "dd"); + + /* src is forbidden, target is allowed */ + ASSERT_NEQ(system("dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/zero count=64"), 0, "dd"); + +cleanup: + cleanup_cgroup_environment(); + dev_cgroup__destroy(skel); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c deleted file mode 100644 index adeaf63cb6fa3..0000000000000 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,85 +0,0 @@ -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only -/* Copyright (c) 2017 Facebook - */ - -#include <stdio.h> -#include <stdlib.h> -#include <string.h> -#include <errno.h> -#include <assert.h> -#include <sys/time.h> - -#include <linux/bpf.h> -#include <bpf/bpf.h> -#include <bpf/libbpf.h> - -#include "cgroup_helpers.h" -#include "testing_helpers.h" - -#define DEV_CGROUP_PROG "./dev_cgroup.bpf.o" - -#define TEST_CGROUP "/test-bpf-based-device-cgroup/" - -int main(int argc, char **argv) -{ - struct bpf_object *obj; - int error = EXIT_FAILURE; - int prog_fd, cgroup_fd; - __u32 prog_cnt; - - /* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */ - libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL); - - if (bpf_prog_test_load(DEV_CGROUP_PROG, BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE, - &obj, &prog_fd)) { - printf("Failed to load DEV_CGROUP program\n"); - goto out; - } - - cgroup_fd = cgroup_setup_and_join(TEST_CGROUP); - if (cgroup_fd < 0) { - printf("Failed to create test cgroup\n"); - goto out; - } - - /* Attach bpf program */ - if (bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE, 0)) { - printf("Failed to attach DEV_CGROUP program"); - goto err; - } - - if (bpf_prog_query(cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE, 0, NULL, NULL, - &prog_cnt)) { - printf("Failed to query attached programs"); - goto err; - } - - /* All operations with /dev/zero and and /dev/urandom are allowed, - * everything else is forbidden. - */ - assert(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null") == 0); - assert(system("mknod /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null c 1 3")); - assert(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_null") == 0); - - /* /dev/zero is whitelisted */ - assert(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero") == 0); - assert(system("mknod /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero c 1 5") == 0); - assert(system("rm -f /tmp/test_dev_cgroup_zero") == 0); - - assert(system("dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/zero count=64") == 0); - - /* src is allowed, target is forbidden */ - assert(system("dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/full count=64")); - - /* src is forbidden, target is allowed */ - assert(system("dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/zero count=64")); - - error = 0; - printf("test_dev_cgroup:PASS\n"); - -err: - cleanup_cgroup_environment(); - -out: - return error; -} -- 2.39.2

1 year, 5 months

2
7
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: filesystems: add missing stddef header

by Amer Al Shanawany

fix compiler warning and errors when compiling statmount test. Signed-off-by: Amer Al Shanawany <amer.shanawany(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c index 3eafd7da58e2..e6d7c4f1c85b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <assert.h> +#include <stddef.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <sched.h> #include <fcntl.h> -- 2.34.1

1 year, 5 months

2
6
0 0

[PATCH] kunit: Cover 'assert.c' with tests

by Ivan Orlov

There are multiple assertion formatting functions in the `assert.c` file, which are not covered with tests yet. Implement the KUnit test for these functions. The test consists of 11 test cases for the following functions: 1) 'is_literal' 2) 'is_str_literal' 3) 'kunit_assert_prologue', test case for multiple assert types 4) 'kunit_assert_print_msg' 5) 'kunit_unary_assert_format' 6) 'kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format' 7) 'kunit_binary_assert_format' 8) 'kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format' 9) 'kunit_binary_str_assert_format' 10) 'kunit_assert_hexdump' 11) 'kunit_mem_assert_format' The test aims at maximizing the branch coverage for the assertion formatting functions. As you can see, it covers some of the static helper functions as well, so we have to import the test source in the `assert.c` file in order to be able to call and validate them. Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322(a)gmail.com> --- lib/kunit/assert.c | 4 + lib/kunit/assert_test.c | 416 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 420 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/kunit/assert_test.c diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c index dd1d633d0fe2..ab68c6daf546 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/assert.c +++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c @@ -270,3 +270,7 @@ void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_mem_assert_format); + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +#include "assert_test.c" +#endif diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert_test.c b/lib/kunit/assert_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d54841740761 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/kunit/assert_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,416 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * KUnit test for the assertion formatting functions. + * Author: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322(a)gmail.com> + */ +#include <kunit/test.h> + +#define TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE 128 + +static void kunit_test_is_literal(struct kunit *test) +{ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("5", 5)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("0", 0)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("1234567890", 1234567890)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("-1234567890", -1234567890)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("05", 5)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("", 0)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("-0", 0)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("12#45", 1245)); +} + +static void kunit_test_is_str_literal(struct kunit *test) +{ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"Hello, World!\"", "Hello, World!")); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"\"", "")); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"\"\"", "\"")); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("", "")); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"", "\"")); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"Abacaba", "Abacaba")); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("Abacaba\"", "Abacaba")); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"Abacaba\"", "\"Abacaba\"")); +} + +KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kfree_wrapper, kfree, const void *); + +/* this function is used to get a "char *" string from the string stream and defer its cleanup */ +static char *get_str_from_stream(struct kunit *test, struct string_stream *stream) +{ + char *str = string_stream_get_string(stream); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, str); + kunit_add_action(test, kfree_wrapper, (void *)str); + + return str; +} + +static void kunit_test_assert_prologue(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + const struct kunit_loc location = { + .file = "testfile.c", + .line = 1337, + }; + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + + /* Test an expectation fail prologue */ + kunit_assert_prologue(&location, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, stream); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), + "EXPECTATION FAILED at testfile.c:1337\n"); + + /* Test an assertion fail prologue */ + string_stream_clear(stream); + kunit_assert_prologue(&location, KUNIT_ASSERTION, stream); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), + "ASSERTION FAILED at testfile.c:1337\n"); +} + +/* + * This function accepts an arbitrary count of parameters and generates a va_format struct, + * which can be used to validate kunit_assert_print_msg function + */ +static void verify_assert_print_msg(struct kunit *test, + struct string_stream *stream, + char *expected, const char *format, ...) +{ + va_list list; + const struct va_format vformat = { + .fmt = format, + .va = &list, + }; + + va_start(list, format); + string_stream_clear(stream); + kunit_assert_print_msg(&vformat, stream); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), expected); +} + +static void kunit_test_assert_print_msg(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + + verify_assert_print_msg(test, stream, "\nTest", "Test"); + verify_assert_print_msg(test, stream, "\nAbacaba -123 234", "%s %d %u", + "Abacaba", -123, 234U); + verify_assert_print_msg(test, stream, "", NULL); +} + +/* + * Further code contains the tests for different assert format functions. + * This helper function accepts the assert format function, executes it and + * validates the result string from the stream. + */ +static void validate_assert(assert_format_t format_func, struct kunit *test, + const struct kunit_assert *assert, + const char *expected, struct string_stream *stream) +{ + struct va_format message = { NULL, NULL }; + + string_stream_clear(stream); + format_func(assert, &message, stream); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), expected); +} + +static void kunit_test_unary_assert_format(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + struct kunit_assert assert = {}; + struct kunit_unary_assert un_assert = { + .assert = assert, + .condition = "expr", + .expected_true = true, + }; + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + + validate_assert(kunit_unary_assert_format, test, &un_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected expr to be true, but is false\n", + stream); + + un_assert.expected_true = false; + validate_assert(kunit_unary_assert_format, test, &un_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected expr to be false, but is true\n", + stream); +} + +static void kunit_test_ptr_not_err_assert_format(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + struct kunit_assert assert = {}; + struct kunit_ptr_not_err_assert not_err_assert = { + .assert = assert, + .text = "expr", + .value = NULL, + }; + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + + /* Value is NULL. The corresponding message should be printed out */ + validate_assert(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, test, + &not_err_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected expr is not null, but is\n", + stream); + + /* Value is not NULL, but looks like an error pointer. Error should be printed out */ + not_err_assert.value = (void *)-12; + validate_assert(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, test, + &not_err_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected expr is not error, but is: -12\n", + stream); +} + +static void kunit_test_binary_assert_format(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + struct kunit_assert assert = {}; + struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = { + .left_text = "1 + 2", + .operation = "==", + .right_text = "2", + }; + const struct kunit_binary_assert binary_assert = { + .assert = assert, + .text = &text, + .left_value = 3, + .right_value = 2, + }; + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + + /* + * the right argument is "literal" (see test for `is_literal` above), + * so the right argument won't be printed out separately. + */ + validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected 1 + 2 == 2, but\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + "1 + 2 == 3 (0x3)\n", + stream); + + /* Now both arguments are not "literal". They both will be printed out separately */ + text.right_text = "4 - 2"; + validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected 1 + 2 == 4 - 2, but\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + "1 + 2 == 3 (0x3)\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + "4 - 2 == 2 (0x2)", + stream); + + /* Now the left argument is "literal", so it won't be printed out */ + text.left_text = "3"; + validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected 3 == 4 - 2, but\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + "4 - 2 == 2 (0x2)", + stream); + + /* The left and the right arguments are not "literal", so they won't be printed out */ + text.right_text = "2"; + validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected 3 == 2, but\n", stream); +} + +static void kunit_test_binary_ptr_assert_format(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + struct kunit_assert assert = {}; + char *expected; + static const void *var_a = (void *)0xDEADBEEF; + static const void *var_b = (void *)0xBADDCAFE; + struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = { + .left_text = "var_a", + .operation = "==", + .right_text = "var_b", + }; + struct kunit_binary_ptr_assert binary_ptr_assert = { + .assert = assert, + .text = &text, + .left_value = var_a, + .right_value = var_b, + }; + + expected = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected); + /* + * Print the expected string to the buffer first. + * This is necessary as we may have different count of leading zeros in the pointer + * on different architectures. + */ + snprintf(expected, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected var_a == var_b, but\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + "var_a == %px\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "var_b == %px", + var_a, var_b); + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + validate_assert(kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format, test, + &binary_ptr_assert.assert, expected, stream); +} + +static void kunit_test_binary_str_assert_format(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + struct kunit_assert assert = {}; + static const char *var_a = "abacaba"; + static const char *var_b = "kernel"; + struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = { + .left_text = "var_a", + .operation = "==", + .right_text = "var_b", + }; + struct kunit_binary_str_assert binary_str_assert = { + .assert = assert, + .text = &text, + .left_value = var_a, + .right_value = var_b, + }; + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + + /* Both arguments are not "string literals", so they should be printed separately */ + validate_assert(kunit_binary_str_assert_format, test, + &binary_str_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected var_a == var_b, but\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + "var_a == \"abacaba\"\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + "var_b == \"kernel\"", + stream); + + /* Left argument is a "string literal", so it shouldn't be printed separately */ + text.left_text = "\"abacaba\""; + validate_assert(kunit_binary_str_assert_format, test, &binary_str_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected \"abacaba\" == var_b, but\n" + KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "var_b == \"kernel\"", stream); + + /* Both arguments are "string literals", so they shouldn't be printed separately */ + text.right_text = "\"kernel\""; + validate_assert(kunit_binary_str_assert_format, test, &binary_str_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected \"abacaba\" == \"kernel\", but\n", stream); +} + +static const u8 hex_testbuf1[] = { 0x26, 0x74, 0x6b, 0x9c, 0x55, + 0x45, 0x9d, 0x47, 0xd6, 0x47, + 0x1, 0x89, 0x8c, 0x81, 0x94, + 0x12, 0xfe, 0x01 }; +static const u8 hex_testbuf2[] = { 0x26, 0x74, 0x6b, 0x9c, 0x55, + 0x45, 0x9d, 0x47, 0x21, 0x47, + 0xcd, 0x89, 0x24, 0x50, 0x94, + 0x12, 0xba, 0x01 }; +static void kunit_test_assert_hexdump(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + /* + * Check that we are getting numbers like <xx> on the right places. + * Also check that we get a newline after 16 bytes + */ + kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, hex_testbuf1, hex_testbuf2, sizeof(hex_testbuf1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + " 26 74 6b 9c 55 45 9d 47 <d6> 47 <01> 89 <8c><81> 94 12 \n" + KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "<fe> 01 "); + + /* + * We shouldn't get any <xx> numbers when comparing the buffer with itself. + * We still should get a newline after 16 printed bytes + */ + string_stream_clear(stream); + kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, hex_testbuf1, hex_testbuf1, sizeof(hex_testbuf1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), + KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT + " 26 74 6b 9c 55 45 9d 47 d6 47 01 89 8c 81 94 12 \n" + KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT " fe 01 "); +} + +static void kunit_test_mem_assert_format(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct string_stream *stream; + struct string_stream *expected_stream; + struct kunit_assert assert = {}; + static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = { + .left_text = "hex_testbuf1", + .operation = "==", + .right_text = "hex_testbuf2", + }; + struct kunit_mem_assert mem_assert = { + .assert = assert, + .text = &text, + .left_value = NULL, + .right_value = hex_testbuf2, + .size = sizeof(hex_testbuf1), + }; + + expected_stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected_stream); + stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream); + + /* The left value is NULL */ + validate_assert(kunit_mem_assert_format, test, &mem_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected hex_testbuf1 is not null, but is\n", + stream); + + /* The right value is NULL, the left value is not NULL */ + mem_assert.left_value = hex_testbuf1; + mem_assert.right_value = NULL; + validate_assert(kunit_mem_assert_format, test, &mem_assert.assert, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "Expected hex_testbuf2 is not null, but is\n", + stream); + + /* Both arguments are not null */ + mem_assert.left_value = hex_testbuf1; + mem_assert.right_value = hex_testbuf2; + + /* + * Building the expected buffer. + */ + string_stream_add(expected_stream, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected hex_testbuf1 == hex_testbuf2, but\n"); + string_stream_add(expected_stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "hex_testbuf1 ==\n"); + kunit_assert_hexdump(expected_stream, hex_testbuf1, hex_testbuf2, mem_assert.size); + string_stream_add(expected_stream, + "\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "hex_testbuf2 ==\n"); + kunit_assert_hexdump(expected_stream, hex_testbuf2, hex_testbuf1, mem_assert.size); + + validate_assert(kunit_mem_assert_format, test, &mem_assert.assert, + get_str_from_stream(test, expected_stream), stream); +} + +struct kunit_case assert_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_is_literal), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_is_str_literal), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_assert_prologue), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_assert_print_msg), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_unary_assert_format), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_ptr_not_err_assert_format), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_binary_assert_format), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_binary_ptr_assert_format), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_binary_str_assert_format), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_assert_hexdump), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_mem_assert_format), + {} +}; + +struct kunit_suite assert_test_suite = { + .name = "kunit-assert", + .test_cases = assert_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suites(&assert_test_suite); -- 2.34.1

1 year, 5 months

2
6
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: default to host arch for LLVM builds

by Valentin Obst

Align the behavior for gcc and clang builds by interpreting unset `ARCH` and `CROSS_COMPILE` variables in `LLVM` builds as a sign that the user wants to build for the host architecture. This patch preserves the properties that setting the `ARCH` variable to an unknown value will trigger an error that complains about insufficient information, and that a set `CROSS_COMPILE` variable will override the target triple that is determined based on presence/absence of `ARCH`. When compiling with clang, i.e., `LLVM` is set, an unset `ARCH` variable in combination with an unset `CROSS_COMPILE` variable, i.e., compiling for the host architecture, leads to compilation failures since `lib.mk` can not determine the clang target triple. In this case, the following error message is displayed for each subsystem that does not set `ARCH` in its own Makefile before including `lib.mk` (lines wrapped at 75 chrs): make[1]: Entering directory '/mnt/build/linux/tools/testing/selftests/ sysctl' ../lib.mk:33: *** Specify CROSS_COMPILE or add '--target=' option to lib.mk. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory '/mnt/build/linux/tools/testing/selftests/ sysctl' In the same scenario a gcc build would default to the host architecture, i.e., it would use plain `gcc`. Fixes: 795285ef2425 ("selftests: Fix clang cross compilation") Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Valentin Obst <kernel(a)valentinobst.de> --- I am not entirely sure whether this behavior is in fact known and intended and whether the way to obtain the host target triple is sufficiently general. The flag was introduced in llvm-8 with [1], it will be an error in older clang versions. The target triple you get with `-print-target-triple` may not be the same that you would get when explicitly setting ARCH to you host architecture. For example on my x86_64 system it get `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu` instead of `x86_64-linux-gnu`, similar deviations were observed when testing other clang binaries on compiler-explorer, e.g., [2]. An alternative could be to simply do: ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m) before using it to select the target. Possibly with some post processing, but at that point we would likely be replicating `scripts/subarch.include`. This is what some subsystem Makefiles do before including `lib.mk`. This change might make it possible to remove the explicit setting of `ARCH` from the few subsystem Makefiles that do it. [1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50755 [2]: https://godbolt.org/z/r7Gn9bvv1 Changes in v1: - Shortened commit message. - Link to RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240303-selftests-libmk-llvm-rfc-v1-1-9ab53e365e… --- tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk b/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk index da2cade3bab0..8ae203d8ed7f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ else ifneq ($(filter -%,$(LLVM)),) LLVM_SUFFIX := $(LLVM) endif +CLANG := $(LLVM_PREFIX)clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) + CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_arm := arm-linux-gnueabi CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_arm64 := aarch64-linux-gnu CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_hexagon := hexagon-linux-musl @@ -18,7 +20,13 @@ CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_riscv := riscv64-linux-gnu CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_s390 := s390x-linux-gnu CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_x86 := x86_64-linux-gnu CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_x86_64 := x86_64-linux-gnu -CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS := $(CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_$(ARCH)) + +# Default to host architecture if ARCH is not explicitly given. +ifeq ($(ARCH),) +CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS := $(shell $(CLANG) -print-target-triple) +else +CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS := $(CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS_$(ARCH)) +endif ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),) ifeq ($(CLANG_TARGET_FLAGS),) @@ -30,7 +38,7 @@ else CLANG_FLAGS += --target=$(notdir $(CROSS_COMPILE:%-=%)) endif # CROSS_COMPILE -CC := $(LLVM_PREFIX)clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) $(CLANG_FLAGS) -fintegrated-as +CC := $(CLANG) $(CLANG_FLAGS) -fintegrated-as else CC := $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc endif # LLVM --- base-commit: 4cece764965020c22cff7665b18a012006359095 change-id: 20240303-selftests-libmk-llvm-rfc-5fe3cfa9f094 Best regards, -- Valentin Obst <kernel(a)valentinobst.de>

1 year, 5 months

4
7
0 0

[PATCH v2] selftest/tty: Use harness framework in tty

by Shengyu Li

Similarly, this one is based on automated tools and a very small percentage of manual modifications to automatically refactor the version that uses kselftest_harness.h, which is logically clearer. Signed-off-by: Shengyu Li <shengyu.li.evgeny(a)gmail.com> --- v2: Fixed the last Assert --- .../testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c | 44 +++++-------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c index 9e1a40f5db17..5894022eb879 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <linux/limits.h> -#include "../kselftest.h" +#include "../kselftest_harness.h" #define MIN_TTY_PATH_LEN 8 @@ -42,65 +42,43 @@ static int write_dev_tty(void) return r; } -int main(int argc, char **argv) +TEST(tty_tstamp_update) { - int r; char tty[PATH_MAX] = {}; struct stat st1, st2; - int result = KSFT_FAIL; - ksft_print_header(); - ksft_set_plan(1); - - r = readlink("/proc/self/fd/0", tty, PATH_MAX); - if (r < 0) { + ASSERT_GE(readlink("/proc/self/fd/0", tty, PATH_MAX), 0) { ksft_print_msg("readlink on /proc/self/fd/0 failed: %m\n"); - goto out; } if (!tty_valid(tty)) { - ksft_print_msg("invalid tty path '%s'\n", tty); - result = KSFT_SKIP; - goto out; - + ksft_print_msg("SKIP: invalid tty path '%s'\n", tty); + exit(KSFT_SKIP); } - r = stat(tty, &st1); - if (r < 0) { + ASSERT_GE(stat(tty, &st1), 0) { ksft_print_msg("stat failed on tty path '%s': %m\n", tty); - goto out; } /* We need to wait at least 8 seconds in order to observe timestamp change */ /* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… */ sleep(10); - r = write_dev_tty(); - if (r < 0) { - ksft_print_msg("failed to write to /dev/tty: %s\n", - strerror(-r)); - goto out; + ASSERT_GE(write_dev_tty(), 0) { + ksft_perror("failed to write to /dev/tty"); } - r = stat(tty, &st2); - if (r < 0) { + ASSERT_GE(stat(tty, &st2), 0) { ksft_print_msg("stat failed on tty path '%s': %m\n", tty); - goto out; } /* We wrote to the terminal so timestamps should have been updated */ - if (st1.st_atim.tv_sec == st2.st_atim.tv_sec && + ASSERT_FALSE(st1.st_atim.tv_sec == st2.st_atim.tv_sec && st1.st_mtim.tv_sec == st2.st_mtim.tv_sec) { ksft_print_msg("tty timestamps not updated\n"); - goto out; } ksft_print_msg( "timestamps of terminal '%s' updated after write to /dev/tty\n", tty); - result = KSFT_PASS; - -out: - ksft_test_result_report(result, "tty_tstamp_update\n"); - - ksft_finished(); } +TEST_HARNESS_MAIN -- 2.25.1

1 year, 5 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] selftest/tty: Use harness framework in tty

by Shengyu Li

Similarly, this one is based on automated tools and a very small percentage of manual modifications to automatically refactor the version that uses kselftest_harness.h, which is logically clearer. Signed-off-by: Shengyu Li <shengyu.li.evgeny(a)gmail.com> --- .../testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c | 48 ++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c index 9e1a40f5db17..cdaa6a15ee65 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tty/tty_tstamp_update.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <linux/limits.h> -#include "../kselftest.h" +#include "../kselftest_harness.h" #define MIN_TTY_PATH_LEN 8 @@ -42,65 +42,45 @@ static int write_dev_tty(void) return r; } -int main(int argc, char **argv) +TEST(tty_tstamp_update) { - int r; char tty[PATH_MAX] = {}; struct stat st1, st2; - int result = KSFT_FAIL; - ksft_print_header(); - ksft_set_plan(1); - - r = readlink("/proc/self/fd/0", tty, PATH_MAX); - if (r < 0) { + ASSERT_GE(readlink("/proc/self/fd/0", tty, PATH_MAX), 0) { ksft_print_msg("readlink on /proc/self/fd/0 failed: %m\n"); - goto out; } if (!tty_valid(tty)) { - ksft_print_msg("invalid tty path '%s'\n", tty); - result = KSFT_SKIP; - goto out; - + ksft_print_msg("SKIP: invalid tty path '%s'\n", tty); + exit(KSFT_SKIP); } - r = stat(tty, &st1); - if (r < 0) { + ASSERT_GE(stat(tty, &st1), 0) { ksft_print_msg("stat failed on tty path '%s': %m\n", tty); - goto out; } /* We need to wait at least 8 seconds in order to observe timestamp change */ /* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… */ sleep(10); - r = write_dev_tty(); - if (r < 0) { - ksft_print_msg("failed to write to /dev/tty: %s\n", - strerror(-r)); - goto out; + ASSERT_GE(write_dev_tty(), 0) { + ksft_perror("failed to write to /dev/tty"); } - r = stat(tty, &st2); - if (r < 0) { + ASSERT_GE(stat(tty, &st2), 0) { ksft_print_msg("stat failed on tty path '%s': %m\n", tty); - goto out; } /* We wrote to the terminal so timestamps should have been updated */ - if (st1.st_atim.tv_sec == st2.st_atim.tv_sec && - st1.st_mtim.tv_sec == st2.st_mtim.tv_sec) { + ASSERT_NE(st1.st_atim.tv_sec, st2.st_atim.tv_sec) { + ksft_print_msg("tty timestamps not updated\n"); + } + ASSERT_NE(st1.st_mtim.tv_sec, st2.st_mtim.tv_sec) { ksft_print_msg("tty timestamps not updated\n"); - goto out; } ksft_print_msg( "timestamps of terminal '%s' updated after write to /dev/tty\n", tty); - result = KSFT_PASS; - -out: - ksft_test_result_report(result, "tty_tstamp_update\n"); - - ksft_finished(); } +TEST_HARNESS_MAIN -- 2.25.1

1 year, 5 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] Documentation: kselftest: fix codeblock

by Yo-Jung (Leo) Lin

Add extra colon to mark command in the next paragraph as codeblock Signed-off-by: Yo-Jung (Leo) Lin <0xff07(a)gmail.com> --- Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst index ff10dc6eef5d..dcf634e411bd 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ expected time it takes to run a test. If you have control over the systems which will run the tests you can configure a test runner on those systems to use a greater or lower timeout on the command line as with the `-o` or the `--override-timeout` argument. For example to use 165 seconds instead -one would use: +one would use:: $ ./run_kselftest.sh --override-timeout 165 -- 2.34.1

1 year, 5 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: Use TAP interface in the set_memory_region test

by Thomas Huth

Use the kselftest_harness.h interface in this test to get TAP output, so that it is easier for the user to see what the test is doing. (Note: We are not using the KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST_SUITE() macro here since these tests are creating their VMs with the vm_create_barebones() function, not with vm_create_with_one_vcpu()) Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones(a)ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com> --- v2: - Rebase to linux-next branch - Make "loops" variable static - Added Andrew's Reviewed-by .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 86 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c index 68c899d27561..a5c9bee5235a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <test_util.h> #include <kvm_util.h> #include <processor.h> +#include "kselftest_harness.h" /* * s390x needs at least 1MB alignment, and the x86_64 MOVE/DELETE tests need a @@ -38,6 +39,8 @@ extern const uint64_t final_rip_end; static sem_t vcpu_ready; +static int loops; + static inline uint64_t guest_spin_on_val(uint64_t spin_val) { uint64_t val; @@ -219,6 +222,13 @@ static void test_move_memory_region(void) kvm_vm_free(vm); } +TEST(move_in_use_region) +{ + ksft_print_msg("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); + for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++) + test_move_memory_region(); +} + static void guest_code_delete_memory_region(void) { uint64_t val; @@ -308,12 +318,19 @@ static void test_delete_memory_region(void) kvm_vm_free(vm); } -static void test_zero_memory_regions(void) +TEST(delete_in_use_region) +{ + ksft_print_msg("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); + for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++) + test_delete_memory_region(); +} + +TEST(zero_memory_regions) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; struct kvm_vm *vm; - pr_info("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n"); + ksft_print_msg("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n"); vm = vm_create_barebones(); vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); @@ -326,7 +343,7 @@ static void test_zero_memory_regions(void) } #endif /* __x86_64__ */ -static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void) +TEST(invalid_memory_region_flags) { uint32_t supported_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES; const uint32_t v2_only_flags = KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD; @@ -389,7 +406,7 @@ static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void) * Test it can be added memory slots up to KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS, then any * tentative to add further slots should fail. */ -static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void) +TEST(add_max_memory_regions) { int ret; struct kvm_vm *vm; @@ -408,13 +425,13 @@ static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void) max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS); TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 0, "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 0"); - pr_info("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots); + ksft_print_msg("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots); vm = vm_create_barebones(); /* Check it can be added memory slots up to the maximum allowed */ - pr_info("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n", - (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10); + ksft_print_msg("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n", + (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10); mem = mmap(NULL, (size_t)max_mem_slots * MEM_REGION_SIZE + alignment, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, @@ -455,12 +472,21 @@ static void test_invalid_guest_memfd(struct kvm_vm *vm, int memfd, TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "%s", msg); } -static void test_add_private_memory_region(void) +static bool has_cap_guest_memfd(void) +{ + return kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) && + (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM)); +} + +TEST(add_private_memory_region) { struct kvm_vm *vm, *vm2; int memfd, i; - pr_info("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); + if (!has_cap_guest_memfd()) + SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM"); + + ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); vm = vm_create_barebones_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM); @@ -491,13 +517,16 @@ static void test_add_private_memory_region(void) kvm_vm_free(vm); } -static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void) +TEST(add_overlapping_private_memory_regions) { struct kvm_vm *vm; int memfd; int r; - pr_info("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); + if (!has_cap_guest_memfd()) + SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM"); + + ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); vm = vm_create_barebones_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM); @@ -536,46 +565,15 @@ static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void) close(memfd); kvm_vm_free(vm); } + #endif int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { -#ifdef __x86_64__ - int i, loops; - - /* - * FIXME: the zero-memslot test fails on aarch64 and s390x because - * KVM_RUN fails with ENOEXEC or EFAULT. - */ - test_zero_memory_regions(); -#endif - - test_invalid_memory_region_flags(); - - test_add_max_memory_regions(); - -#ifdef __x86_64__ - if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) && - (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM))) { - test_add_private_memory_region(); - test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(); - } else { - pr_info("Skipping tests for KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n"); - } - if (argc > 1) loops = atoi_positive("Number of iterations", argv[1]); else loops = 10; - pr_info("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); - for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) - test_move_memory_region(); - - pr_info("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops); - for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) - test_delete_memory_region(); -#endif - - return 0; + return test_harness_run(argc, argv); } -- 2.44.0

1 year, 5 months

3
4
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror April 2024