On 18 August 2012 12:06, Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org wrote:
This should have been fixed by this patch . I'm a bit surprised that we are seeing these failures still ?
../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ldsodefs.h:41:0: warning: "MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA" redefined [enabled by default]
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.glibc.ports/1428
which should have made it back to eglibc 2.16 ?
Well, that's embarrassing. The eglibc script is used to both build eglibc and to use a fixed eglibc to test GCC. The latter was winning so every snapshot build was actually building eglibc 2.12.
Fixed and testing,
-- Michael
On 20 August 2012 00:38, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 August 2012 12:06, Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org wrote:
This should have been fixed by this patch . I'm a bit surprised that we are seeing these failures still ?
../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ldsodefs.h:41:0: warning: "MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA" redefined [enabled by default]
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.glibc.ports/1428
which should have made it back to eglibc 2.16 ?
Well, that's embarrassing. The eglibc script is used to both build eglibc and to use a fixed eglibc to test GCC. The latter was winning so every snapshot build was actually building eglibc 2.12.
Looks like the same problem also affects -
http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/eglibc-2.17~svn20247/logs/armv7l-natty-cb...
ramana
On 20 August 2012 20:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org wrote:
On 20 August 2012 00:38, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 August 2012 12:06, Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org wrote:
This should have been fixed by this patch . I'm a bit surprised that we are seeing these failures still ?
../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ldsodefs.h:41:0: warning: "MORE_ELF_HEADER_DATA" redefined [enabled by default]
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.glibc.ports/1428
which should have made it back to eglibc 2.16 ?
Well, that's embarrassing. The eglibc script is used to both build eglibc and to use a fixed eglibc to test GCC. The latter was winning so every snapshot build was actually building eglibc 2.12.
Looks like the same problem also affects -
http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/eglibc-2.17~svn20247/logs/armv7l-natty-cb...
Yip, the fix went in as r360. You can see the difference in the head of the build log. Here's r359:
make[5]: Entering directory `/scratch/cbuild/slave/slaves/tcpanda06/eglibc-2.17~svn20247/eglibc/eglibc-2.12'
and here's r360 from http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/eglibc-2.17~svn20247/logs/armv7l-natty-cb...:
make[5]: Entering directory `/scratch/cbuild/slave/slaves/tcpanda04/eglibc-2.17~svn20247/eglibc/eglibc-2.17~'
-- Michael
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org