Hi, I am looking into these regressions.
Regards, Surya
On 26/06/24 7:51 am, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel.
We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1270 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix.
In gcc_check master-aarch64 after:
| commit gcc-15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf5 | Author: Surya Kumari Jangala jskumari@linux.ibm.com | Date: Tue Jun 25 08:37:49 2024 -0500 | | ira: Scale save/restore costs of callee save registers with block frequency | | In assign_hard_reg(), when computing the costs of the hard registers, the | cost of saving/restoring a callee-save hard register in prolog/epilog is | taken into consideration. However, this cost is not scaled with the entry | block frequency. Without scaling, the cost of saving/restoring is quite | small and this can result in a callee-save register being chosen by | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted.
FAIL: 4 regressions
regressions.sum: === g++ tests ===
Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ... FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/cpy_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve -moverride=tune=none check-function-bodies dup_x0_m === gcc tests ===
Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: gcc.dg/pr10474.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing shrink-wrapping"
Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ... ... and 5 more entries
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact... Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2234/artifact...
Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha...
Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b...
List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
- tcwg_gcc_check
** master-aarch64 *** FAIL: 4 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha... *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact...
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
-
Surya Kumari Jangala