On 2 October 2015 at 18:04, Pinski, Andrew Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com wrote:

...

On Oct 2, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Christophe Lyon christophe.lyon@linaro.org wrote:

== Progress == 2 days off (4/10)

• Infrastructure/validation: (3/10)

further checking of cross-testing results stability on aarch64-linux

• found a workaround for a timestamp problem (_Pragma3 testcase)

contrib/gcc_update --touch is the best way to fix the above issue.

Yes, that's what I added to abe.

...

• looked at c11-atomic-exec-5 whose execution time ranges between 1s

and 1h :-)

I even seeing that on thunderx.

Thanks for the confirmation, I saw your comment on bugzilla.

I understood you thought it was a HW problem with your platform. Since we see it on different HW, it could mean there is an implementation problem in libatomic?

...

• forcing make check to -j8 seems to work well, will work on a nicer

improvement

• reported and briefly looked at failure in a new libstdc++ test

(directory_iterator) on armv5t

• Misc (conf calls, meetings, emails, ....) (2/10)

• Internal (1/10)

• GNU linker patch review

---

linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain