* ci notify:

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel.

We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.

In glibc_check master-arm after:

| 29 patches in glibc | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/98131 | 59fbaae3a6e Optimize various ways to obtain the page size using <bits/pagesize.h> | 564bcbe0067 posix: Use <support/next_to_fault.h> in tst-fnmatch3 | 27a360de01d malloc: Use volatile as compiler barrier in tst-memalign, tst-valloc | e24dfc8d9a8 Linux: Optimize getpagesize using <sys/pagesize.h> | 3283915ffd0 Install the <sys/pagesize.h> header file | ... and 24 more patches in glibc | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 6948ee4edf0 stdio-common: Fix memory leak in tst-freopen4* tests on UNSUPPORTED

FAIL: 1 regressions

regressions.sum: | === glibc tests === | | Running glibc:elf ... | XPASS: elf/tst-load-alignment

Does this mean that the 32-bit arm tester uses a non-default toolchain that increases page alignment to 64 KiB? With my cross-tester, elf/tst-load-alignment fails as expected because the binaries can only be loaded on 4 KiB page systems, based on the program header layout.

Thanks, Florian