Hi Michael,
I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch.
See here: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114968~ams-codesour...
Andrew
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs andrew.stubbs@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch.
See here: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114968~ams-codesour...
I noticed similar yesterday. SPEC 'relocate' uses the build directory in a regex which fails when it hits the '+' and other random characters we use in the path name. Once past that, it hits the 80 character interpreter path limit and dies.
I've fixed both. Please resubmit any SPEC jobs.
-- Michael
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs andrew.stubbs@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch.
See here: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114968~ams-codesour...
I noticed similar yesterday. SPEC 'relocate' uses the build directory in a regex which fails when it hits the '+' and other random characters we use in the path name. Once past that, it hits the 80 character interpreter path limit and dies.
I've fixed both. Please resubmit any SPEC jobs.
I've spawned spec2000 runs of gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114968~ams-codesourcery~arm-64-bit-shifts-4.7 and the ancestor gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114965.
-- Michael
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org