Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81: 5 regressions 4 improvements on master-thumb_m33_hard_eabi
ci_notify@linaro.org writes:
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after: | commit gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81 | Author: Sam James sam@gentoo.org | Date: Sat Mar 29 21:09:25 2025 +0000 | | testsuite: arm: fixup more dg-final syntax | | ... as Richard E mentioned on the ML. Followup to r15-8956-ge90d6c2639c392. | | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted.
Produces 5 regressions 4 improvements: | | regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times sxth\tr[0-9]+,r[0-9]+ 2 | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\.f32\.s32\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\.s32\.f32\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vmov\tr[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 | ... and 1 more
This one may need an ARM person to take a look at. (The issue was latent, and the test wasn't being run fully before.)
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 17:49, Sam James via Gcc-regression gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
ci_notify@linaro.org writes:
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after: | commit gcc-15-9030-g78e0cf06c81 | Author: Sam James sam@gentoo.org | Date: Sat Mar 29 21:09:25 2025 +0000 | | testsuite: arm: fixup more dg-final syntax | | ... as Richard E mentioned on the ML. Followup to r15-8956-ge90d6c2639c392. | | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted.
Produces 5 regressions 4 improvements: | | regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times sxth\tr[0-9]+,r[0-9]+ 2 | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\.f32\.s32\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vcvt\.s32\.f32\ts[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/short-vfp-1.c scan-assembler-times vmov\tr[0-9]+,s[0-9]+ 2 | ... and 1 more
This one may need an ARM person to take a look at. (The issue was latent, and the test wasn't being run fully before.)
Indeed. I even re-built the compiler from the commit when the test was introduced, and it wouldn't pass even after fixing the dg directives :-(
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
-
Christophe Lyon -
Sam James