Ken, Åsa: could you add a -O0 and -O1 build to the size and benchmark results? I'm looking at the writeup and it would be interesting to contrast the speed/size of -O0 with -O2.
Ta,
-- Michael
Hi, Sure, I can kick-off runs for these lower levels today.
Regards Åsa
On 24 January 2012 01:29, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
Ken, Åsa: could you add a -O0 and -O1 build to the size and benchmark results? I'm looking at the writeup and it would be interesting to contrast the speed/size of -O0 with -O2.
Ta,
-- Michael
On 01/24/2012 01:29 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
Ken, Åsa: could you add a -O0 and -O1 build to the size and benchmark results? I'm looking at the writeup and it would be interesting to contrast the speed/size of -O0 with -O2.
Ta,
Hi,
I've built the images using -O1/-O0 and updated the charts:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmsCLxCMnnISdDNQSEM2ZHIxd3dVNjZ...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmsCLxCMnnISdHFtZll0OWdiTlhpdjZ...
The qt4e image fails with -O0 which might be a compiler bug (I'm trying to provide a reduced testcase).
Regards, Ken
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
-
Asa Sandahl -
Ken Werner -
Michael Hope