Connect detox [2/10]
ABE benchmarking automation - TCWG-360 [5/10] * Backport benchmarking ** Harder than expected, have to build the backport into a binary, then benchmark that binary, passing information between jobs. ** AFAIK I'm blazing the Jenkins-chainging trail for us. * Release benchmarking ** New LAVA release broke my image (but quickly fixed by the LAVA folks) ** Now seems to be running into issues with Jenkins/builders/an anonymous job-slayer * Misc fixes and improvements ** Main highlight being support for building with separated-out sysroot
Misc - [3/10]
=Plan=
Kick off catomics benchmark runs (Attempt to) close out cache effects on Juno issue Carry on with Jenkins
=Issues=
* Some of the Jenkins builders seem unreliable * My lightly hacked version of the BinaryRelease job is unreliable ** Is the BinaryRelease job itself is reliable
Oh -- and I'm on holiday this Friday (27th).
On 23 February 2015 at 10:12, Bernie Ogden bernie.ogden@linaro.org wrote:
Connect detox [2/10]
ABE benchmarking automation - TCWG-360 [5/10]
- Backport benchmarking
** Harder than expected, have to build the backport into a binary, then benchmark that binary, passing information between jobs. ** AFAIK I'm blazing the Jenkins-chainging trail for us.
- Release benchmarking
** New LAVA release broke my image (but quickly fixed by the LAVA folks) ** Now seems to be running into issues with Jenkins/builders/an anonymous job-slayer
- Misc fixes and improvements
** Main highlight being support for building with separated-out sysroot
Misc - [3/10]
=Plan=
Kick off catomics benchmark runs (Attempt to) close out cache effects on Juno issue Carry on with Jenkins
=Issues=
- Some of the Jenkins builders seem unreliable
- My lightly hacked version of the BinaryRelease job is unreliable
** Is the BinaryRelease job itself is reliable
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org