linaro-toolchain

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

2 participants
5806 discussions

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 6 regressions after basepoints/gcc-14-3441-ga1558e9ad85 tree-optimization/111115 - SLP of masked stores

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Richard, Your patch below ICEs on aarch64-linux-gnu. Should reproduce easily on native or cross aarch64-linux-gnu build. Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing this. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 24, 2023, at 22:03, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch. > Please find below some details about it. If you have any questions, please > follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > In CI config tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64 after: > > | commit a1558e9ad856938f165f838733955b331ebbec09 > | Author: Richard Biener <rguenther(a)suse.de> > | Date: Wed Aug 23 14:28:26 2023 +0200 > | > | tree-optimization/111115 - SLP of masked stores > | > | The following adds the capability to do SLP on .MASK_STORE, I do not > | plan to add interleaving support. > | > | PR tree-optimization/111115 > | ... 21 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 6 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/aarch64-sve.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c (internal compiler error: in get_group_load_store_type, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:2121) > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2b\\t.z[0-9] > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2d\\t.z[0-9] > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2h\\t.z[0-9] > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c scan-assembler-not \\tst2w\\t.z[0-9] > > ... and 1 more entries > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/857/artifact… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/856/artifact… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a1558e9ad856938f165f838733955b331e… > > Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-893 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 6 regressions > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/857/

3 years, 1 month

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 24 Aug

by Peter Maydell

Progress (short week, 3 days): * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - code review: + Xilinx Versal CFI support series + v2 of RTH's Cortex-A710 series - a few more -Wvla patches - put together and sent the first arm pullreq for the 8.2 cycle * QEMU-530 [QEMU ARM v9.4 Baseline CPU for TCG] - FEAT_MOPS: + updated to use a refactoring suggested by RTH + started looking at SETG operation (memset with MTE tag setting) -- PMM

3 years, 1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 10 regressions after gcc commit: 5 commits in gcc

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Julian, Your patch series causes regressions on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you please investigate? Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 19, 2023, at 09:32, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 10 regressions after gcc commit: 5 commits in gcc > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch. > Please find below some details about it. > > In CI config tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64 after: > > | gcc commits: > | dce6c135fb52fd631c2fc82d8048d32ce41ece21 OpenMP/OpenACC: Reorganise OMP map clause handling in gimplify.cc > | dd49dd178e3eac8e9925baa3d71325d8d5f69215 OpenMP/OpenACC: Unordered/non-constant component offset runtime diagnostic > | bd5a53e6b47907d05672cbb603af363a665b45a4 OpenMP: Pointers and member mappings > | 4e0359d8a659c8abdca3297fc9b0e20ff89f7f82 OpenMP/OpenACC: Rework clause expansion and nested struct handling > | a855174e5461d2b423af7f892fd31dfb10ce09ec OpenMP/OpenACC: Reindent TO/FROM/_CACHE_ stanza in {c_}finish_omp_clause > > FAIL: 10 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === libgomp tests === > > Running libgomp:libgomp.c++/c++.exp ... > FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-2.c output pattern test > FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-3.c output pattern test > > Running libgomp:libgomp.c/c.exp ... > FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-2.c output pattern test > FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-3.c output pattern test > > ... and 9 more entries > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1593/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/836/artifact…

3 years, 1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 6 regressions after gcc commit: basepoints/gcc-14-3331-gcddc26e0274 aarch64: Fine-grained ldp and stp policies with test-cases.

by Manos Anagnostakis

Sorry, forgot cc. On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:24 PM Manos Anagnostakis < manos.anagnostakis(a)vrull.eu> wrote: > Hello Maxim, > > I've found out why this happens. It is a test problem having to do with > -mcpu and should be trivial to address. I should have followed up with a V2 > by next week. > > Thank you for your report! > > Manos. > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 9:54 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Manos, >> >> New tests in your patch [1] fail on aarch64-linux-gnu build in our CI. >> Would you please investigate why? Testing logs are at [2]. >> >> [1] >> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20230818074943.41754-1-m… >> [2] >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1602/art… >> >> -- >> Maxim Kuvyrkov >> https://www.linaro.org >> >> > On Aug 19, 2023, at 08:37, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: >> > >> > [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 6 regressions after gcc commit: >> basepoints/gcc-14-3331-gcddc26e0274 aarch64: Fine-grained ldp and stp >> policies with test-cases. >> > >> > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to >> your patch. >> > Please find below some details about it. >> > >> > In CI config tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64 after: >> > >> > | commit cddc26e0274b51e775929e497f89d203211689d2 >> > | Author: Manos Anagnostakis <manos.anagnostakis(a)vrull.eu> >> > | Date: Fri Aug 18 10:49:43 2023 +0300 >> > | >> > | aarch64: Fine-grained ldp and stp policies with test-cases. >> > | >> > | This patch implements the following TODO in >> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc >> > | to provide the requested behaviour for handling ldp and stp: >> > | >> > | /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction >> formation >> > | ... 47 lines of the commit log omitted. >> > >> > FAIL: 6 regressions >> > >> > regressions.sum: >> > === gcc tests === >> > >> > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/aarch64.exp ... >> > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_aligned.c scan-assembler-times >> ldp\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9] 1 >> > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_aligned.c scan-assembler-times >> ldp\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9] 3 >> > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_aligned.c scan-assembler-times >> ldp\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9] 3 >> > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_always.c scan-assembler-times >> ldp\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9] 2 >> > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_always.c scan-assembler-times >> ldp\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9] 6 >> > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_always.c scan-assembler-times >> ldp\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9] 6 >> > >> > ... and 1 more entries >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- >> > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: >> > >> > Current build : >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1602/art… >> > Reference build : >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/836/artifact… >> > >> > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: >> https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/… >> > >> > Full commit : >> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/cddc26e0274b51e775929e497f89d20321… >> > >> > Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-692 >> > >> > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : >> > * tcwg_gcc_check >> > ** master-aarch64 >> > *** FAIL: 6 regressions >> > *** >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1602/ >> >> >> > > -- > *Manos Anagnostakis | Compiler Engineer |* > E: manos.anagnostakis(a)vrull.eu <makeljana.shkurti(a)vrull.eu> > > *VRULL GmbH *| Beatrixgasse 32 1030 Vienna | > W: www.vrull.eu | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/vrull/> > -- *Manos Anagnostakis | Compiler Engineer |* E: manos.anagnostakis(a)vrull.eu <makeljana.shkurti(a)vrull.eu> *VRULL GmbH *| Beatrixgasse 32 1030 Vienna | W: www.vrull.eu | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/vrull/>

3 years, 1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 6 regressions after gcc commit: basepoints/gcc-14-3331-gcddc26e0274 aarch64: Fine-grained ldp and stp policies with test-cases.

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Manos, New tests in your patch [1] fail on aarch64-linux-gnu build in our CI. Would you please investigate why? Testing logs are at [2]. [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20230818074943.41754-1-m… [2] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1602/art… -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 19, 2023, at 08:37, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 6 regressions after gcc commit: basepoints/gcc-14-3331-gcddc26e0274 aarch64: Fine-grained ldp and stp policies with test-cases. > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch. > Please find below some details about it. > > In CI config tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64 after: > > | commit cddc26e0274b51e775929e497f89d203211689d2 > | Author: Manos Anagnostakis <manos.anagnostakis(a)vrull.eu> > | Date: Fri Aug 18 10:49:43 2023 +0300 > | > | aarch64: Fine-grained ldp and stp policies with test-cases. > | > | This patch implements the following TODO in gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > | to provide the requested behaviour for handling ldp and stp: > | > | /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation > | ... 47 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 6 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/aarch64.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_aligned.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9] 1 > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_aligned.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9] 3 > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_aligned.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9] 3 > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_always.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9] 2 > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_always.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9] 6 > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/ldp_always.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9] 6 > > ... and 1 more entries > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1602/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/836/artifact… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/cddc26e0274b51e775929e497f89d20321… > > Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-692 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 6 regressions > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1602/

3 years, 1 month

[ACTIVITY] Report for week #33

by Thiago Jung Bauermann

Hello, # [GNU-767] Support changing SVE vector length in remote debugging - Continued working on new approach to support changing SVE vector length in remote debugging. # TCWG CI - Analysed GCC regression GNU-880 which is actually an XFAIL → XPASS so I sent a patch removing the xfail annotation. - Analysed GCC regression GNU-881. The problem is that we don't have Python in the ABE sysroot so a new Python GCC plugin testcase fails to build. Sent a patch to detect that situation and mark the test as unsupported. It was committed upstream. - Tested a couple of new versions of a GDB mailing list patch to see if it fixed the failure reported by the precommit CI. Reported results to patch author. - Fixed silly mistake spotted by Laurent in ABE Gerrit requests to use TIMEOUTFACTOR for DejaGnu testsuites. Adjusted it to not use the factor in GDB on armhf and sent new version for review. - Reviewed a couple of Gerrit requests. -- Thiago

3 years, 1 month

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 18 Aug

by Peter Maydell

Progress (short week, 3 days): * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - sent out another couple of "avoid VLA" patches * QEMU-530 [QEMU ARM v9.4 Baseline CPU for TCG] - managed to write some first-pass code for the MTE checks for FEAT_MOPS memset operations. Got something together enough to send to RTH for some pre-review before I roll the approach out to the other insns. -- PMM

3 years, 1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] Failure after gcc commit: basepoints/gcc-14-3309-g360cabf45a0 arm: Add define_attr to to create a mapping between MVE predicated and unpredicated insns

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Stamatis, Let us know if you need any help in troubleshooting the failures in https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=23558 . Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 18, 2023, at 01:13, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > [Linaro-TCWG-CI] Failure after gcc commit: basepoints/gcc-14-3309-g360cabf45a0 arm: Add define_attr to to create a mapping between MVE predicated and unpredicated insns > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch. > Please find below some details about it. > > In CI config tcwg_gcc_build/master-arm after: > > | commit 360cabf45a05d5d2d5a98f0e081cb8f53e01e8aa > | Author: Stamatis Markianos-Wright <stam.markianos-wright(a)arm.com> > | Date: Thu Aug 17 11:30:58 2023 +0100 > | > | arm: Add define_attr to to create a mapping between MVE predicated and unpredicated insns > | > | Hi all, > | > | I'd like to submit two patches that add support for Arm's MVE > | Tail Predicated Low Overhead Loop feature. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe gcc: > # FAILED > # First few build errors in logs: > # 00:02:46 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/mve.md:7018:8: error: invalid decimal constant > # 00:02:46 make[2]: *** [Makefile:2647: s-preds-h] Error 1 > # 00:02:46 make[1]: *** [Makefile:4655: all-gcc] Error 2 > # 00:02:46 make: *** [Makefile:1051: all] Error 2 > # 00:02:28 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/mve.md:7018:8: error: invalid decimal constant > # 00:02:28 make[2]: *** [Makefile:2586: s-conditions] Error 1 > # 00:02:28 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/mve.md:7018:8: error: invalid decimal constant > # 00:02:28 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/mve.md:7018:8: error: invalid decimal constant > # 00:02:28 make[2]: *** [Makefile:2647: s-preds-h] Error 1 > # 00:02:28 make[2]: *** [Makefile:2652: s-constrs-h] Error 1 > # 00:02:28 /home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/config/arm/mve.md:7018:8: error: invalid decimal constant > # 00:02:28 make[2]: *** [Makefile:2642: s-preds] Error 1 > # 00:02:35 make[1]: *** [Makefile:4655: all-gcc] Error 2 > # 00:02:35 make: *** [Makefile:1051: all] Error 2 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe gcc: > 1 > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/1787/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-build/1060/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/360cabf45a05d5d2d5a98f0e081cb8f53e… > > Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-692 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_build > ** master-arm > *** Failure > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm-precommit/1787/

3 years, 1 month

LLVM bots down for extended period

by Aaron Ballman

Hello! You are the point of contact for some build bots in the LLVM build lab that have been down for an extended period of time. If you're not the correct point of contact, can you please CC the right individual (if you know who they are)? The following bot(s) appear to have been down for multiple weeks: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/clang-armv7-global-isel https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/clang-aarch64-sve-vls https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/clang-armv7-vfpv3-full-2stage https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/clang-thumbv7-full-2stage Do you have plans to bring the bot back online? If not, that's okay -- just let me know and I can remove the bots from the lab for you. Thank you! ~Aaron

3 years, 1 month

CMake requirements LLVM buildbots

by Mark de Wever

Hi, As discussed in [1] I just committed [2] to update the minimum CMake version in LLVM to 3.20.0. Unfortunately it seems the ARM builders in the libc++ precommit CI are running CMake 3.16.3 [3]. Would it be possible to update these builders? [1] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-upgrading-llvms-minimum-required-cmake-ver… [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D144509a [3] https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/builds/19366#0186756a-1599-46e… Thanks, Mark

3 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain