o One day off (2/10)
== Progress ==
o Extended Validation (3/10)
- Benchmarking job babysitting.
- Looked at Dejagnu issue (pid killing, resurrected an old patch)
o Upstream GCC (3/10)
- __sync bultin fix for ARMv8.1:
Careful read of the doc shows that there is no issue with the
current implementation (no need to add an extra DMB, acq/rel
semantic is sufficient in this case)
- AArch64 and ARM backend cleanup w/r to reload remaining hooks
Analysis and validation on-going
o Misc (2/10)
* Various meetings and discussions.
== Plan ==
o Continue on-going tasks
== This Week ==
* LTO (6/10)
a) TCWG-548 (2/10)
- Tweaked algorithm, which shows some improvements in reducing external
references
b) TCWG-666 (4/10)
- Had a look at bitwise-ccp
- WIP prototype patch
* Benchmarking (1/10)
- Got results for linaro-gcc-6 for coremark-pro for arm-linux-gnueabihf
* Sick Leave (2/10)
* Misc (1/10)
- Pinged for reviewing patches for TCWG-665 and TCWG-72
- Meetings
== Next Week ==
- Address upstream reviews for TCWG-665
- TCWG-666: Continue with prototype patch.
- TCWG-548: Submit upstream for feedback.
- Benchmarking: Get results for coremark-pro for aarch64-linux-gnu.
== Progress ==
TCWG-653 ARM/Thumb interworking veneers
Have completed an implementation, now in upstream review. Had initial
set of comments and posted an update. Likely to take several
iterations before commit
TCWG-612 ARM TLS support in LLD
Made a start. Looks to be more straightforward the interworking
thunks, should just be grunt-work to get done.
Updated lld slides on llvm sprint presentation.
== Plan ==
TCWG-653 and TCWG-612.
== Progress ==
* ARM: Do not test for CPUs, use SubtargetFeatures [TCWG-623] [4/10]
- Committed another patch upstream, 3 more in review
* ARM: Different ABI functions based on optimization level [TCWG-669] [3/10]
- Make sure we're ABI-compliant at -O0
- Patch in upstream review, need to fix a few things
* List of active environments with llvm-env [TCWG-640] [1/10]
- Committed internally
* Refactor SelectionDAGBuilder::visitInlineAsm [TCWG-643] [1/10]
- In progress (trying to break it up into a few helper functions)
* PR26038 - inline assembly assertion building ARM linux kernel
[TCWG-590] [1/10]
- Started investigating
== Plan ==
* Address any review comments for TCWG-623 and TCWG-669
* Submit patches for TCWG-643 and TCWG-590
Hi Andrew,
On 27 June 2016 at 19:32, Pinski, Andrew <Andrew.Pinski(a)cavium.com> wrote:
>> No gain expected in implementing an Ifunc'ed version of the library.
>
> How did you prove that? What hardware did you run this on to prove it?
> Also have you thought at least doing an ifunc version for 128bit atomics?
up to 64bits, the calls to the libatomic routines are inlined and
armv8.1 CAS and load-operate version are used when the application is
build for armv8.1 architecture. For 128bits, a call to the lib is
made which uses the same LL/SC implementation with or without LSE
support, as CAS and load-operate instruction don't support this data
size.
I don't have armv8.1 hardware and made the analysis on the generated
assembler. Do you have use case on your side where an ifunc version
can be useful ? I'm not aware of an algorithm which can replace
effectively LL/SC implementation with shorter CAS, do you have any
pointers ? Maybe CASP can be used in some cases, I'll investigate it.
Thanks
Yvan
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linaro-toolchain [mailto:linaro-toolchain-bounces@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Yvan Roux
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 1:40 AM
> To: Linaro Toolchain Mailman List <linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org>
> Subject: [ACTIVITY] Week 25
>
> == Progress ==
> o Extended Validation (1/10)
> - Benchmarking job babysitting.
>
> o Upstream GCC (4/10)
> - ARMv8.1 libatomic: Analysis completed.
> No gain expected in implementing an Ifunc'ed version of the library.
> - Working on __sync buitlins potential fix.
>
> o Misc (5/10)
> * Various meetings and discussions.
> * Internal appraisal
>
> == Plan ==
> o Continue on-going tasks (__sync, benchmarking) _______________________________________________
> linaro-toolchain mailing list
> linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
== Progress ==
o Extended Validation (1/10)
- Benchmarking job babysitting.
o Upstream GCC (4/10)
- ARMv8.1 libatomic: Analysis completed.
No gain expected in implementing an Ifunc'ed version of the library.
- Working on __sync buitlins potential fix.
o Misc (5/10)
* Various meetings and discussions.
* Internal appraisal
== Plan ==
o Continue on-going tasks (__sync, benchmarking)
# Progress #
* TCWG-333, ISA bit treatment in ARM thumb mode.
Got some comments from Maciej (MIPS) and need to address them.
* TCWG-518, ARM range stepping patches. [2/10]
Combine the path of "proceed" and "resume" so that we only change one
place instead of two to support range stepping. Patches are being
tested.
* TCWG-655, Workaround ARM linux kernel ptrace bug... [2/10]
by pining both program and debugger on the same core in the affected
test cases.
* Off on Wed to Fri. [6/10]
# Plan #
* Continue things above,
--
Yao
== This Week ==
* LTO (8/10)
a) TCWG-558 (2/10)
- found a way to detect if stmt is inside a loop
- addressed issue with -ffat-lto-objects
- patch posted upstream, waiting for review.
b) ipa-vrp (3/10)
- Prototype patch for propagating value ranges
inter-procedurally (accidental overlap with Kugan's patches)
- Experimented and reviewed Kugan's patch.
c) TCWG-548 (2/10)
- Wrote a pass to gather stats on external references.
- Measurements with SPEC2000 with and without prototype patch
d) Had a look at pointer alignment propagation within ipa-cp pass (1/10)
* Benchmarking (1/10)
- Obtained results for linaro-gcc-5, fsf-gcc-6 for coremark-pro for
arm-linux-gnueabihf target.
- Submitted job 112 for bkk16-buildfarm-benchmark, status shows SUCCESS, but it
appears no tcwg-benchmark job references build #112.
* Misc (1/10)
- Meetings
== Next Week ==
- Continue with TCWG-548 and ipa-vrp
- Ping patches in upstream reviews
== Progress ==
* Out of office on Monday and Tuesday [4/10]
* ARM: Do not test for CPUs, use SubtargetFeatures [TCWG-623] [4/10]
- First patch committed upstream (6 features / properties)
- Another patch in upstream review (5 features / properties)
- Working on another series of patches
* Use member initializers in ARMSubtarget [TCWG-659] [1/10]
- Trivial refactoring suggested during code review for TCWG-623
- Committed upstream
* Unbreak the selfhost bots [TCWG-661] [1/10]
- Currently bisecting the issue affecting
clang-cmake-thumbv7-full-sh (in progress)
- Tried bisecting one of the issues affecting
clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost and clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon, but
the test board died in the process; Renato is trying to reproduce on
one of his boards
* Remove exit-on-error flag from CodeGen tests [TCWG-604]
- Finally committed upstream
== Plan ==
* ARM: Do not test for CPUs, use SubtargetFeatures [TCWG-623]
* Unbreak the selfhost bots [TCWG-661]
