The Mesa issue referenced below pointed out a possible deadlock:
[ 1231.611031] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1231.611033] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1231.611034] ---- ---- [ 1231.611035] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611038] local_irq_disable(); [ 1231.611039] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611041] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611044] <Interrupt> [ 1231.611045] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611047] *** DEADLOCK ***
In this example, CPU0 would be any function accessing job->dependencies through the xa_* functions that doesn't disable interrupts (eg: drm_sched_job_add_dependency, drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb).
CPU1 is executing drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb as a fence signalling callback so in an interrupt context. It will deadlock when trying to grab the xa_lock which is already held by CPU0.
Replacing all xa_* usage by their xa_*_irq counterparts would fix this issue, but Christian pointed out another issue: dma_fence_signal takes fence.lock and so does dma_fence_add_callback.
dma_fence_signal() // locks f1.lock -> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb() -> foreach dependencies -> dma_fence_add_callback() // locks f2.lock
This will deadlock if f1 and f2 share the same spinlock.
To fix both issues, the code iterating on dependencies and re-arming them is moved out to drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work.
v2: reworded commit message (Philipp) v3: added Fixes tag (Philipp)
Fixes: 2fdb8a8f07c2 ("drm/scheduler: rework entity flush, kill and fini") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/13908 Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com Suggested-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 34 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c index c8e949f4a568..fe174a4857be 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c @@ -173,26 +173,15 @@ int drm_sched_entity_error(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_entity_error);
+static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f, + struct dma_fence_cb *cb); + static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work(struct work_struct *wrk) { struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(wrk, typeof(*job), work); - - drm_sched_fence_scheduled(job->s_fence, NULL); - drm_sched_fence_finished(job->s_fence, -ESRCH); - WARN_ON(job->s_fence->parent); - job->sched->ops->free_job(job); -} - -/* Signal the scheduler finished fence when the entity in question is killed. */ -static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f, - struct dma_fence_cb *cb) -{ - struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_job, - finish_cb); + struct dma_fence *f; unsigned long index;
- dma_fence_put(f); - /* Wait for all dependencies to avoid data corruptions */ xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, f) { struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence = to_drm_sched_fence(f); @@ -220,6 +209,21 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f, dma_fence_put(f); }
+ drm_sched_fence_scheduled(job->s_fence, NULL); + drm_sched_fence_finished(job->s_fence, -ESRCH); + WARN_ON(job->s_fence->parent); + job->sched->ops->free_job(job); +} + +/* Signal the scheduler finished fence when the entity in question is killed. */ +static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f, + struct dma_fence_cb *cb) +{ + struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_job, + finish_cb); + + dma_fence_put(f); + INIT_WORK(&job->work, drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work); schedule_work(&job->work); }
On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 10:53 +0100, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
The Mesa issue referenced below pointed out a possible deadlock:
[ 1231.611031] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1231.611033] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1231.611034] ---- ---- [ 1231.611035] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611038] local_irq_disable(); [ 1231.611039] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611041] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611044] <Interrupt> [ 1231.611045] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611047] *** DEADLOCK ***
In this example, CPU0 would be any function accessing job->dependencies through the xa_* functions that doesn't disable interrupts (eg: drm_sched_job_add_dependency, drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb).
CPU1 is executing drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb as a fence signalling callback so in an interrupt context. It will deadlock when trying to grab the xa_lock which is already held by CPU0.
Replacing all xa_* usage by their xa_*_irq counterparts would fix this issue, but Christian pointed out another issue: dma_fence_signal takes fence.lock and so does dma_fence_add_callback.
dma_fence_signal() // locks f1.lock -> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb() -> foreach dependencies -> dma_fence_add_callback() // locks f2.lock
This will deadlock if f1 and f2 share the same spinlock.
To fix both issues, the code iterating on dependencies and re-arming them is moved out to drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work.
v2: reworded commit message (Philipp) v3: added Fixes tag (Philipp)
Thx for the update. In the future please put the changelog below between a pair of '---'
--- v2: … v3: … ---
Some things I have unfortunately overlooked below.
Fixes: 2fdb8a8f07c2 ("drm/scheduler: rework entity flush, kill and fini")
We should +Cc stable. It's a deadlock after all.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/13908 Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com Suggested-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 34 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c index c8e949f4a568..fe174a4857be 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c @@ -173,26 +173,15 @@ int drm_sched_entity_error(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_entity_error); +static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb);
It's far better to move the function up instead. Can you do that?
[…]
+/* Signal the scheduler finished fence when the entity in question is killed. */ +static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb)+{
- struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_job,
finish_cb);- dma_fence_put(f);
It would be great if we knew what fence is being dropped here and why. I know you're just moving the pre-existing code, but if you should know, informing about that via comment would be great.
Optional.
Rest of the code looks good. No further objections.
P.
Le 04/11/2025 à 13:43, Philipp Stanner a écrit :
On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 10:53 +0100, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
The Mesa issue referenced below pointed out a possible deadlock:
[ 1231.611031] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1231.611033] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1231.611034] ---- ---- [ 1231.611035] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611038] local_irq_disable(); [ 1231.611039] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611041] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611044] <Interrupt> [ 1231.611045] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611047] *** DEADLOCK ***
In this example, CPU0 would be any function accessing job->dependencies through the xa_* functions that doesn't disable interrupts (eg: drm_sched_job_add_dependency, drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb).
CPU1 is executing drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb as a fence signalling callback so in an interrupt context. It will deadlock when trying to grab the xa_lock which is already held by CPU0.
Replacing all xa_* usage by their xa_*_irq counterparts would fix this issue, but Christian pointed out another issue: dma_fence_signal takes fence.lock and so does dma_fence_add_callback.
dma_fence_signal() // locks f1.lock -> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb() -> foreach dependencies -> dma_fence_add_callback() // locks f2.lock
This will deadlock if f1 and f2 share the same spinlock.
To fix both issues, the code iterating on dependencies and re-arming them is moved out to drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work.
v2: reworded commit message (Philipp) v3: added Fixes tag (Philipp)
Thx for the update. In the future please put the changelog below between a pair of '---'
v2: … v3: …
OK.
Some things I have unfortunately overlooked below.
Fixes: 2fdb8a8f07c2 ("drm/scheduler: rework entity flush, kill and fini")
We should +Cc stable. It's a deadlock after all.
OK.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/13908 Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com Suggested-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 34 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c index c8e949f4a568..fe174a4857be 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c @@ -173,26 +173,15 @@ int drm_sched_entity_error(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_entity_error); +static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb);It's far better to move the function up instead. Can you do that?
Since drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb uses drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs and vice versa, I'll have to forward declare one of the 2 functions anyway.
[…]
+/* Signal the scheduler finished fence when the entity in question is killed. */ +static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb)+{
- struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_job,
finish_cb);- dma_fence_put(f);
It would be great if we knew what fence is being dropped here and why. I know you're just moving the pre-existing code, but if you should know, informing about that via comment would be great.
As discussed offline, "f" is simply the fence being signaled, I'm not sure it warrants a comment.
Regards, Pierre-Eric
Optional.
Rest of the code looks good. No further objections.
P.
On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 16:24 +0100, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
Le 04/11/2025 à 13:43, Philipp Stanner a écrit :
Some things I have unfortunately overlooked below.
Fixes: 2fdb8a8f07c2 ("drm/scheduler: rework entity flush, kill and fini")
We should +Cc stable. It's a deadlock after all.
OK.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/13908 Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com Suggested-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 34 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c index c8e949f4a568..fe174a4857be 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c @@ -173,26 +173,15 @@ int drm_sched_entity_error(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_entity_error); +static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb);It's far better to move the function up instead. Can you do that?
Since drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb uses drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs and vice versa, I'll have to forward declare one of the 2 functions anyway.
Ah, right. OK then.
I can push this and +Cc stable in the commit message if you want.
P.
On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 10:53 +0100, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
The Mesa issue referenced below pointed out a possible deadlock:
[ 1231.611031] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1231.611033] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1231.611034] ---- ---- [ 1231.611035] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611038] local_irq_disable(); [ 1231.611039] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611041] lock(&xa->xa_lock#17); [ 1231.611044] <Interrupt> [ 1231.611045] lock(&fence->lock); [ 1231.611047] *** DEADLOCK ***
In this example, CPU0 would be any function accessing job->dependencies through the xa_* functions that doesn't disable interrupts (eg: drm_sched_job_add_dependency, drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb).
CPU1 is executing drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb as a fence signalling callback so in an interrupt context. It will deadlock when trying to grab the xa_lock which is already held by CPU0.
Replacing all xa_* usage by their xa_*_irq counterparts would fix this issue, but Christian pointed out another issue: dma_fence_signal takes fence.lock and so does dma_fence_add_callback.
dma_fence_signal() // locks f1.lock -> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb() -> foreach dependencies -> dma_fence_add_callback() // locks f2.lock
This will deadlock if f1 and f2 share the same spinlock.
To fix both issues, the code iterating on dependencies and re-arming them is moved out to drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work.
v2: reworded commit message (Philipp) v3: added Fixes tag (Philipp)
Fixes: 2fdb8a8f07c2 ("drm/scheduler: rework entity flush, kill and fini") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/13908 Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com Suggested-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com
Pushed to drm-misc-fixes.
Thx, Pierre-Eric!
P.
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org