Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

5 participants
2538 discussions

Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem

by Maxime Ripard

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:58:20AM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote: > On 2023-10-25 10:43, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:14:25PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote: > >>>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > >>>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > >>>> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj; > >>>> + struct dma_buf buf_mock; > >>>> + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock; > >>>> + struct sg_table *sgt; > >>>> + char *buf; > >>>> + int ret; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */ > >>>> + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf); > >>>> + > >>>> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt); > >>>> + > >>>> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > >>>> + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */ > >>>> + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE; > >>>> + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock; > >>>> + > >>>> + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs); > >>>> + > >>>> + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj); > >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */ > >>>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > >>>> +} > >>> > >>> KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you > >>> should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll > >>> leak resources. > >>> > >>> You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that > >>> whole discussion > >>> > >> > >> You are right. I slightly prefer using KUnit expectations (unless actions > >> are strictly necessary) since I feel using actions makes test cases a bit > >> less straightforward to understand. Is this okay for you? > > > > I disagree. Actions make it easier to reason about, even when comparing > > assertion vs expectation > > > > Like, for the call to sg_alloc_table and > > drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(), the reasonable use of assert vs > > expect would be something like: > > > > sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt); > > > > ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > > > > /* > > * Here, it's already not super clear whether you want to expect vs > > * assert. expect will make you handle the failure case later, assert will > > * force you to call kfree on sgt. Both kind of suck in their own ways. > > */ > > > > sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE); > > > > gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj); > > > > /* > > * If the assert fails, we forgot to call sg_free_table(sgt) and kfree(sgt). > > */ > > > > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE); > > KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp); > > KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs); > > > > /* > > * And here we have to handle the case where the expectation was wrong, > > * but the test still continued. > > */ > > > > But if you're not using an action, you still have to call kfree(sgt), > > which means that you might still > > > > shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt); > > > > /* > > * If the assertion fails, we now have to call drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem) > > */ > > > > /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */ > > drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > > > > /* everything's fine now */ > > > > The semantics around drm_gem_shmem_free make it a bit convoluted, but > > doing it using goto/labels, plus handling the assertions and error > > reporting would be difficult. > > > > Using actions, we have: > > > > sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt); > > > > ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > > > > ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > > > > ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > > > > sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE); > > > > gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt); > > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj); > > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE); > > KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp); > > KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs); > > > > /* drm_gem_shmem_free will free the struct sg_table itself */ > > kunit_remove_action(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt); > > kunit_remove_action(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt); > > I agree that using actions makes error handling cleaner. However, I still > have some concerns about the additional complexity that actions introduce. > For instance, I feel these two lines make the testing harness more complex > without asserting any additional property of the component under test. If anything, the API makes it more difficult to deal with. It would actually be harder/messier to handle without an action. > In some sense, I wonder if it is worth worrying about memory leaks when > a test case fails. At that point, the system is already in an inconsistent > state due to a bug in the component under test, so it is unsafe to continue > anyway. I guess the larger issue is: once that code will be merged, we're going to have patches to convert to actions because they make it nicer and fix a couple of issues anyway. So, if it's still the state we're going to end up in, why not doing it right from the beginning? Maxime

1 year, 2 months

Re: [PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: reserved-memory: MediaTek: Add reserved memory for SVP

by Yong Wu (吴勇)

On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 11:20 +0530, Jaskaran Singh wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > On 10/20/2023 3:20 PM, Yong Wu (吴勇) wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 10:16 +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote: > >> > >> Instead of having a vendor specific binding for cma area, How > about > >> retrieving > >> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1594948208-4739-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunih… > >> ? > >> dma_heap_add_cma can just associate cma region and create a heap. > So, > >> we can reuse cma heap > >> code for allocation instead of replicating that code here. > >> > > > > Thanks for the reference. I guess we can't use it. There are two > > reasons: > > > > a) The secure heap driver is a pure software driver and we have no > > device for it, therefore we cannot call dma_heap_add_cma. > > > > Hi Yong, > > We're considering using struct cma as the function argument to > dma_heap_add_cma() rather than struct device. Would this help > resolve the problem of usage with dma_heap_add_cma()? Yes. If we use "struct cma", I guess it works. > > > b) The CMA area here is dynamic for SVP. Normally this CMA can be > used > > in the kernel. In the SVP case we use cma_alloc to get it and pass > the > > entire CMA physical start address and size into TEE to protect the > CMA > > region. The original CMA heap cannot help with the TEE part. > > > > Referring the conversation at > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a2995de23c24ef22c071c6976c02b97e9b50126.camel… > ; > > since we're considering abstracting secure mem ops, would it make > sense > to use the default CMA heap ops (cma_heap_ops), allocate buffers from > it > and secure each allocated buffer? Then it looks you also need tee operation like tee_client_open_session and tee_client_invoke_func, right? It seems we also need change a bit for "cma_heap_allocate" to allow cma support operations from secure heap. I will send a v2 to move the discussion forward. The v2 is based on our case, It won't include the cma part. > > Thanks, > Jaskaran. > > > Thanks. > > > >> Thanks, > >> Vijay > >> > >> > >> >

1 year, 2 months

[PATCH 0/9] dma-buf: heaps: Add MediaTek secure heap

by Yong Wu

This patchset consists of two parts, the first is from John and TJ. It adds some heap interfaces, then our kernel users could allocate buffer from special heap. The second part is adding MTK secure heap for SVP (Secure Video Path). A total of two heaps are added, one is mtk_svp and the other is mtk_svp_cma. The mtk_svp buffer is reserved for the secure world after bootup and it is used for ES/working buffer, while the mtk_svp_cma buffer is dynamically reserved for the secure world and will be get ready when we start playing secure videos, this heap is used for the frame buffer. Once the security video playing is complete, the CMA will be released. For easier viewing, I've split the new heap file into several patches. The consumers of new heap and new interfaces are our codec and drm which will send upstream soon, probably this week. Base on v6.6-rc1. John Stultz (2): dma-heap: Add proper kref handling on dma-buf heaps dma-heap: Provide accessors so that in-kernel drivers can allocate dmabufs from specific heaps T.J. Mercier (1): dma-buf: heaps: Deduplicate docs and adopt common format Yong Wu (6): dma-buf: heaps: Initialise MediaTek secure heap dma-buf: heaps: mtk_sec_heap: Initialise tee session dma-buf: heaps: mtk_sec_heap: Add tee service call for buffer allocating/freeing dma-buf: heaps: mtk_sec_heap: Add dma_ops dt-bindings: reserved-memory: MediaTek: Add reserved memory for SVP dma_buf: heaps: mtk_sec_heap: Add a new CMA heap .../mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml | 42 ++ drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 127 +++-- drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig | 8 + drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Makefile | 1 + drivers/dma-buf/heaps/mtk_secure_heap.c | 458 ++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/dma-heap.h | 42 +- 6 files changed, 630 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/dma-buf/heaps/mtk_secure_heap.c -- 2.18.0

1 year, 2 months

Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem

by Maxime Ripard

Hi, On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:14:25PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote: > >> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test) > >> +{ > >> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > >> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > >> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj; > >> + struct dma_buf buf_mock; > >> + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock; > >> + struct sg_table *sgt; > >> + char *buf; > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */ > >> + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf); > >> + > >> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt); > >> + > >> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > >> + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE); > >> + > >> + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */ > >> + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE; > >> + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock; > >> + > >> + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs); > >> + > >> + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj); > >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt); > >> + > >> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */ > >> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > >> +} > > > > KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you > > should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll > > leak resources. > > > > You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that > > whole discussion > > > > You are right. I slightly prefer using KUnit expectations (unless actions > are strictly necessary) since I feel using actions makes test cases a bit > less straightforward to understand. Is this okay for you? I disagree. Actions make it easier to reason about, even when comparing assertion vs expectation Like, for the call to sg_alloc_table and drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(), the reasonable use of assert vs expect would be something like: sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt); ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); /* * Here, it's already not super clear whether you want to expect vs * assert. expect will make you handle the failure case later, assert will * force you to call kfree on sgt. Both kind of suck in their own ways. */ sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE); gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj); /* * If the assert fails, we forgot to call sg_free_table(sgt) and kfree(sgt). */ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE); KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp); KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs); /* * And here we have to handle the case where the expectation was wrong, * but the test still continued. */ But if you're not using an action, you still have to call kfree(sgt), which means that you might still shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj); KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt); /* * If the assertion fails, we now have to call drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem) */ /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); /* everything's fine now */ The semantics around drm_gem_shmem_free make it a bit convoluted, but doing it using goto/labels, plus handling the assertions and error reporting would be difficult. Using actions, we have: sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt); ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE); gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE); KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp); KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs); /* drm_gem_shmem_free will free the struct sg_table itself */ kunit_remove_action(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt); kunit_remove_action(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt); shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj); KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt); ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, drm_gem_shmem_free_wrapper, shmem); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); The last one is arguable, but for the previous ones it makes error handling much more convenient and easy to reason about. The wrappers are also a bit inconvenient to use, but it's mostly there to avoid a compiler warning at the moment. This patch will help hopefully: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230915050125.3609689-1-davidgow@g… Maxime

1 year, 2 months

Re: [PATCH] drm: docs: Remove item from TODO list

by Maxime Ripard

Hi, On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:25:50AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:31 AM Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Since "Clean up checks for already prepared/enabled in panels" has > > already been done and merged [1], I think there is no longer a need > > for this item to be in the gpu TODO. > > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/551421/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira(a)hotmail.com> > > --- > > Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 25 ------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-) > > It's not actually all done. It's in a bit of a limbo state right now, > unfortunately. I landed all of the "simple" cases where panels were > needlessly tracking prepare/enable, but the less simple cases are > still outstanding. > > Specifically the issue is that many panels have code to properly power > cycle themselves off at shutdown time and in order to do that they > need to keep track of the prepare/enable state. After a big, long > discussion [1] it was decided that we could get rid of all the panel > code handling shutdown if only all relevant DRM KMS drivers would > properly call drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(). > > I made an attempt to get DRM KMS drivers to call > drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() [2] [3] [4]. I was able to land the > patches that went through drm-misc, but currently many of the > non-drm-misc ones are blocked waiting for attention. > > ...so things that could be done to help out: > > a) Could review patches that haven't landed in [4]. Maybe adding a > Reviewed-by tag would help wake up maintainers? > > b) Could see if you can identify panels that are exclusively used w/ > DRM drivers that have already been converted and then we could post > patches for just those panels. I have no idea how easy this task would > be. Is it enough to look at upstream dts files by "compatible" string? I think it is, yes. Maxime

1 year, 2 months

Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem

by Maxime Ripard

Hi Marco, On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:45:40PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote: > This patch introduces an initial KUnit test suite for GEM objects > backed by shmem buffers. > > Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan(a)redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig > index 3eee8636f847..f0a77e3e04d7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig > @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ config DRM_KUNIT_TEST > select DRM_EXPORT_FOR_TESTS if m > select DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS > select DRM_EXEC > + select DRM_GEM_SHMEM_HELPER I know that DRM_EXEC already stands out, but these should be ordered alphabetically, so it should be before DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS. > default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS > help > This builds unit tests for DRM. This option is not useful for > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile > index ba7baa622675..b8227aab369e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST) += \ > drm_plane_helper_test.o \ > drm_probe_helper_test.o \ > drm_rect_test.o \ > - drm_exec_test.o > + drm_exec_test.o \ > + drm_gem_shmem_test.o Ditto. > CFLAGS_drm_mm_test.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..0bf6727f08d2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c > @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * KUnit test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem buffers > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2023 Red Hat, Inc. > + * > + * Author: Marco Pagani <marpagan(a)redhat.com> > + */ > + > +#include <linux/dma-buf.h> > +#include <linux/iosys-map.h> > +#include <linux/sizes.h> > + > +#include <kunit/test.h> > + > +#include <drm/drm_device.h> > +#include <drm/drm_drv.h> > +#include <drm/drm_gem.h> > +#include <drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h> > +#include <drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h> > + > +#define TEST_SIZE SZ_1M > +#define TEST_BYTE 0xae > + > +struct fake_dev { > + struct drm_device drm_dev; > + struct device *dev; > +}; > + > +/* Test creating a shmem GEM object */ > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + > + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->base.size, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.filp); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.funcs); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} > + > +/* Test creating a private shmem GEM object from a scatter/gather table */ Thanks for documenting those tests. I believe we should also document what we expect from the test: should the test succeed? fail? if it fails, what is the cause of failure? Based on the following test, I think something like the following would be good: Test that creating a private shmem GEM object from a previously allocated sg_table succeeds and is properly initialized Feel free to change it to something else if you find something missing. > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj; > + struct dma_buf buf_mock; > + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock; > + struct sg_table *sgt; > + char *buf; > + int ret; > + > + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */ > + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf); > + > + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt); > + > + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE); > + > + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */ > + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE; > + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock; > + > + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs); > + > + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt); > + > + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */ > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll leak resources. You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that whole discussion > + > +/* Test pinning backing pages */ > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_pin_pages(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + int i, ret; > + > + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 1); > + > + for (i = 0; i < (shmem->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++) > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages[i]); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_unpin(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} > + > +/* Test creating a virtual mapping */ > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_vmap(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + struct iosys_map map; > + int ret, i; > + > + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_vmap(shmem, &map); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 1); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, iosys_map_is_null(&map)); > + > + iosys_map_memset(&map, 0, TEST_BYTE, TEST_SIZE); > + for (i = 0; i < TEST_SIZE; i++) > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, iosys_map_rd(&map, i, u8), TEST_BYTE); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_vunmap(shmem, &map); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} > + > +/* Test exporting a scatter/gather table */ > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + struct sg_table *sgt; > + struct scatterlist *sg; > + unsigned int si, len = 0; > + int ret; > + > + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); > + > + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_sg_table(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->sgt); > + > + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) { > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg); > + len += sg->length; > + } > + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE); > + > + kfree(sgt); > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} > + > +/* Test exporting a scatter/gather pinned table for PRIME */ > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_sg_table(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + struct sg_table *sgt; > + struct scatterlist *sg; > + unsigned int si, len = 0; > + > + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem); > + > + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, sgt, shmem->sgt); > + > + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) { > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg); > + len += sg->length; > + } > + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE); > + > + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */ > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} > + > +/* Test updating madvise status */ > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_madvise(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + int ret; > + > + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 0); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 1); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, -1); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 0); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} > + > +/* Test purging */ > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_purge(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; > + struct sg_table *sgt; > + int ret; > + > + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret); > + > + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt); > + > + ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_purge(shmem); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret); > + > + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem); > +} > + > +static int drm_gem_shmem_test_init(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev; > + struct device *dev; > + > + /* Allocate a parent device */ > + dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev); > + > + /* > + * The DRM core will automatically initialize the GEM core and create > + * a DRM Memory Manager object which provides an address space pool > + * for GEM objects allocation. > + */ > + fdev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, struct fake_dev, > + drm_dev, DRIVER_GEM); > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fdev); > + > + fdev->dev = dev; > + test->priv = fdev; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_exit(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv; > + > + drm_kunit_helper_free_device(test, fdev->dev); > +} You don't need to call drm_kunit_helper_free_device() anymore Maxime

1 year, 2 months

[PATCH v2 00/11] Add mediate-drm secure flow for SVP

by Jason-JH.Lin

The patch series provides drm driver support for enabling secure video path (SVP) playback on MediaiTek hardware in the Linux kernel. Memory Definitions: secure memory - Memory allocated in the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) which is inaccessible in the REE (Rich Execution Environment, i.e. linux kernel/userspace). secure handle - Integer value which acts as reference to 'secure memory'. Used in communication between TEE and REE to reference 'secure memory'. secure buffer - 'secure memory' that is used to store decrypted, compressed video or for other general purposes in the TEE. secure surface - 'secure memory' that is used to store graphic buffers. Memory Usage in SVP: The overall flow of SVP starts with encrypted video coming in from an outside source into the REE. The REE will then allocate a 'secure buffer' and send the corresponding 'secure handle' along with the encrypted, compressed video data to the TEE. The TEE will then decrypt the video and store the result in the 'secure buffer'. The REE will then allocate a 'secure surface'. The REE will pass the 'secure handles' for both the 'secure buffer' and 'secure surface' into the TEE for video decoding. The video decoder HW will then decode the contents of the 'secure buffer' and place the result in the 'secure surface'. The REE will then attach the 'secure surface' to the overlay plane for rendering of the video. Everything relating to ensuring security of the actual contents of the 'secure buffer' and 'secure surface' is out of scope for the REE and is the responsibility of the TEE. DRM driver handles allocation of gem objects that are backed by a 'secure surface' and for displaying a 'secure surface' on the overlay plane. This introduces a new flag for object creation called DRM_MTK_GEM_CREATE_ENCRYPTED which indicates it should be a 'secure surface'. All changes here are in MediaTek specific code. --- Based on 3 series and 1 patch: [1] dma-buf: heaps: Add MediaTek secure heap - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=782776 [2] add driver to support secure video decoder - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=782922 [3] soc: mediatek: Add register definitions for GCE - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20231017064717.21… [4] Add CMDQ secure driver for SVP - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=795502 --- Change in v2: 1. remove the DRIVER_RDNDER flag for mtk_drm_ioctl 2. move cmdq_insert_backup_cookie into client driver 3. move secure gce node define from mt8195-cherry.dtsi to mt8195.dtsi --- CK Hu (1): drm/mediatek: Add interface to allocate MediaTek GEM buffer. Jason-JH.Lin (10): drm/mediatek/uapi: Add DRM_MTK_GEM_CREATED_ENCRYPTTED flag drm/mediatek: Add secure buffer control flow to mtk_drm_gem drm/mediatek: Add secure identify flag and funcution to mtk_drm_plane drm/mediatek: Add mtk_ddp_sec_write to config secure buffer info drm/mediatek: Add get_sec_port interface to mtk_ddp_comp drm/mediatek: Add secure layer config support for ovl drm/mediatek: Add secure layer config support for ovl_adaptor drm/mediatek: Add secure flow support to mediatek-drm drm/mediatek: Add cmdq_insert_backup_cookie before secure pkt finalize arm64: dts: mt8195: Add secure mbox settings for vdosys arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_drv.h | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 31 +- .../gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl_adaptor.c | 15 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 274 +++++++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 14 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h | 13 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 13 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_gem.c | 121 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_gem.h | 16 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c | 7 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mdp_rdma.c | 11 +- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mdp_rdma.h | 2 + include/uapi/drm/mediatek_drm.h | 59 ++++ 16 files changed, 570 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/uapi/drm/mediatek_drm.h -- 2.18.0

1 year, 2 months

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix a null pointer access when the smc_rreg pointer is NULL

by Alex Deucher

Applied. Thanks! Alex On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:06 AM <qu.huang(a)linux.dev> wrote: > > In certain types of chips, such as VEGA20, reading the amdgpu_regs_smc file could result in an abnormal null pointer access when the smc_rreg pointer is NULL. Below are the steps to reproduce this issue and the corresponding exception log: > > 1. Navigate to the directory: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0 > 2. Execute command: cat amdgpu_regs_smc > 3. Exception Log:: > [4005007.702554] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 > [4005007.702562] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode > [4005007.702567] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page > [4005007.702570] PGD 0 P4D 0 > [4005007.702576] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP NOPTI > [4005007.702581] CPU: 4 PID: 62563 Comm: cat Tainted: G OE 5.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubunt u > [4005007.702590] RIP: 0010:0x0 > [4005007.702598] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6. > [4005007.702600] RSP: 0018:ffffa82b46d27da0 EFLAGS: 00010206 > [4005007.702605] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffa82b46d27e68 > [4005007.702609] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9940656e0000 > [4005007.702612] RBP: ffffa82b46d27dd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff994060c07980 > [4005007.702615] R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f5e06753000 > [4005007.702618] R13: ffff9940656e0000 R14: ffffa82b46d27e68 R15: 00007f5e06753000 > [4005007.702622] FS: 00007f5e0755b740(0000) GS:ffff99479d300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [4005007.702626] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [4005007.702629] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 00000003253fc000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 > [4005007.702633] Call Trace: > [4005007.702636] <TASK> > [4005007.702640] amdgpu_debugfs_regs_smc_read+0xb0/0x120 [amdgpu] > [4005007.703002] full_proxy_read+0x5c/0x80 > [4005007.703011] vfs_read+0x9f/0x1a0 > [4005007.703019] ksys_read+0x67/0xe0 > [4005007.703023] __x64_sys_read+0x19/0x20 > [4005007.703028] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0 > [4005007.703034] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1e3/0x670 > [4005007.703040] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x37/0xb0 > [4005007.703047] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x9/0x20 > [4005007.703052] ? irqentry_exit+0x19/0x30 > [4005007.703057] ? exc_page_fault+0x89/0x160 > [4005007.703062] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30 > [4005007.703068] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > [4005007.703075] RIP: 0033:0x7f5e07672992 > [4005007.703079] Code: c0 e9 b2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d fa b2 0c 00 e8 c5 1d 02 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 e c 28 48 89 54 24 > [4005007.703083] RSP: 002b:00007ffe03097898 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 > [4005007.703088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007f5e07672992 > [4005007.703091] RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007f5e06753000 RDI: 0000000000000003 > [4005007.703094] RBP: 00007f5e06753000 R08: 00007f5e06752010 R09: 00007f5e06752010 > [4005007.703096] R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000022000 > [4005007.703099] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000 > [4005007.703105] </TASK> > [4005007.703107] Modules linked in: nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink algif_hash af_alg binfmt_misc nls_ iso8859_1 ipmi_ssif ast intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper amd64_edac t tm edac_mce_amd kvm_amd ccp mac_hid k10temp kvm acpi_ipmi ipmi_si rapl sch_fq_codel ipmi_devintf ipm i_msghandler msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport mtd pstore_blk efi_pstore ramoops pstore_zone reed_solo mon ip_tables x_tables autofs4 ib_uverbs ib_core amdgpu(OE) amddrm_ttm_helper(OE) amdttm(OE) iommu_v 2 amd_sched(OE) amdkcl(OE) drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec rc_core drm igb ahci xhci_pci libahci i2c_piix4 i2c_algo_bit xhci_pci_renesas dca > [4005007.703184] CR2: 0000000000000000 > [4005007.703188] ---[ end trace ac65a538d240da39 ]--- > [4005007.800865] RIP: 0010:0x0 > [4005007.800871] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6. > [4005007.800874] RSP: 0018:ffffa82b46d27da0 EFLAGS: 00010206 > [4005007.800878] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffa82b46d27e68 > [4005007.800881] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9940656e0000 > [4005007.800883] RBP: ffffa82b46d27dd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff994060c07980 > [4005007.800886] R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f5e06753000 > [4005007.800888] R13: ffff9940656e0000 R14: ffffa82b46d27e68 R15: 00007f5e06753000 > [4005007.800891] FS: 00007f5e0755b740(0000) GS:ffff99479d300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [4005007.800895] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [4005007.800898] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 00000003253fc000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 > > Signed-off-by: Qu Huang <qu.huang(a)linux.dev> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c > index a4faea4..05405da 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c > @@ -748,6 +748,9 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_debugfs_regs_smc_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf, > ssize_t result = 0; > int r; > > + if (!adev->smc_rreg) > + return -EPERM; > + > if (size & 0x3 || *pos & 0x3) > return -EINVAL; > > @@ -804,6 +807,9 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_debugfs_regs_smc_write(struct file *f, const char __user * > ssize_t result = 0; > int r; > > + if (!adev->smc_wreg) > + return -EPERM; > + > if (size & 0x3 || *pos & 0x3) > return -EINVAL; > > -- > 1.8.3.1

1 year, 2 months

[syzbot] [dri?] WARNING in drm_prime_fd_to_handle_ioctl

by syzbot

Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: 1c8b86a3799f Merge tag 'xsa441-6.6-tag' of git://git.kerne.. git tree: upstream console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13005e31680000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=32d0b9b42ceb8b10 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0da81ccba2345eeb7f48 compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=13c48345680000 C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=101b3679680000 Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/45e9377886e9/disk-1c8b86a3.raw… vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9511a41a6d1e/vmlinux-1c8b86a3.… kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fac07e1c3c1a/bzImage-1c8b86a3.… The issue was bisected to: commit 85e26dd5100a182bf8448050427539c0a66ab793 Author: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Date: Thu Jan 26 09:24:26 2023 +0000 drm/client: fix circular reference counting issue bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=14cf17f1680000 final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=16cf17f1680000 console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12cf17f1680000 IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+0da81ccba2345eeb7f48(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 85e26dd5100a ("drm/client: fix circular reference counting issue") ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5040 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:326 drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:326 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5040 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:326 drm_prime_fd_to_handle_ioctl+0x555/0x600 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:374 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 5040 Comm: syz-executor405 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc5-syzkaller-00055-g1c8b86a3799f #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/06/2023 RIP: 0010:drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:326 [inline] RIP: 0010:drm_prime_fd_to_handle_ioctl+0x555/0x600 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:374 Code: 89 df e8 0e 9b 26 fd f0 48 ff 03 e9 7e fd ff ff e8 b0 dc d0 fc 4c 89 f7 44 89 eb e8 75 73 8b 05 e9 da fe ff ff e8 9b dc d0 fc <0f> 0b e9 5d fd ff ff e8 3f 94 26 fd e9 3a fc ff ff 48 8b 7c 24 08 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003a5fc70 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888018f14c00 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff88801d691dc0 RSI: ffffffff84b6ea15 RDI: ffff8881476f3928 RBP: ffff88801fac5400 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: fffffffffffff000 R10: ffff8881476f3800 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffc90003a5fe10 R13: ffff8881476f3800 R14: ffff88801c590c10 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00005555555d6380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000555db75f4058 CR3: 0000000072209000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x280/0x4c0 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:789 drm_ioctl+0x5cb/0xbf0 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:892 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18f/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f0c8214be69 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fff6f4156f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f0c8214be69 RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 00000000c00c642e RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000000000a0 R09: 00000000000000a0 R10: 00000000000000a0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007f0c821c3820 R14: 00007fff6f415720 R15: 00007fff6f415710 </TASK> --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with: #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing. If you want to overwrite bug's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup

1 year, 2 months

[PATCH][next] dma-buf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling()

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

Currently, a NULL pointer dereference will happen in function `dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling()` (at line 615), in case `chain` is not allocated in `mock_chain()` and this function returns `NULL` (at line 86). See below: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c: 86 chain = mock_chain(NULL, f, 1); 87 if (!chain) 88 err = -ENOMEM; 89 90 dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(chain); drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c: 611 void dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence) 612 { 613 unsigned long flags; 614 615 spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags); ^^^^^^^^^^^ | NULL pointer reference if fence == NULL 616 __dma_fence_enable_signaling(fence); 617 spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags); 618 } Fix this by adding a NULL check before dereferencing `fence` in `dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling()`. This will prevent any other NULL pointer dereference when the `fence` passed as an argument is `NULL`. Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference after null check") Fixes: d62c43a953ce ("dma-buf: Enable signaling on fence for selftests") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars(a)kernel.org> --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 9 ++++++++- include/linux/dma-fence.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c index 8aa8f8cb7071..4d2f13560d0f 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -607,14 +607,21 @@ static bool __dma_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence) * This will request for sw signaling to be enabled, to make the fence * complete as soon as possible. This calls &dma_fence_ops.enable_signaling * internally. + * + * Returns 0 on success and a negative error value when @fence is NULL. */ -void dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence) +int dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence) { unsigned long flags; + if (!fence) + return -EINVAL; + spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags); __dma_fence_enable_signaling(fence); spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags); + + return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling); diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h index ebe78bd3d121..1e4025e925e6 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ int dma_fence_add_callback(struct dma_fence *fence, dma_fence_func_t func); bool dma_fence_remove_callback(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb); -void dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence); +int dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence); /** * dma_fence_is_signaled_locked - Return an indication if the fence -- 2.34.1

1 year, 3 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig