Add missing drm_gem_object_put() call when drm_gem_object_lookup()
successfully returns an object. This fixes a GEM object reference
leak that can prevent driver modules from unloading when using
prime buffers.
Fixes: 53096728b891 ("drm: Add DRM prime interface to reassign GEM handle")
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v6.18+
Signed-off-by: Karol Wachowski <karol.wachowski(a)linux.intel.com>
---
Changes between v3 and v2:
- correctly add CC: tag this time
Changes between v1 and v2:
- move setting ret value under if branch as suggested in review
- add Cc: stable 6.18+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
index ca1956608261..bcc08a6aebf8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
@@ -1010,8 +1010,10 @@ int drm_gem_change_handle_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
if (!obj)
return -ENOENT;
- if (args->handle == args->new_handle)
- return 0;
+ if (args->handle == args->new_handle) {
+ ret = 0;
+ goto out;
+ }
mutex_lock(&file_priv->prime.lock);
@@ -1043,6 +1045,8 @@ int drm_gem_change_handle_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&file_priv->prime.lock);
+out:
+ drm_gem_object_put(obj);
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
If there is a large number (hundreds) of dmabufs allocated, the text
output generated from dmabuf_iter_seq_show can exceed common user buffer
sizes (e.g. PAGE_SIZE) necessitating multiple start/stop cycles to
iterate through all dmabufs. However the dmabuf iterator currently
returns NULL in dmabuf_iter_seq_start for all non-zero pos values, which
results in the truncation of the output before all dmabufs are handled.
After dma_buf_iter_begin / dma_buf_iter_next, the refcount of the buffer
is elevated so that the BPF iterator program can run without holding any
locks. When a stop occurs, instead of immediately dropping the reference
on the buffer, stash a pointer to the buffer in seq->priv until
either start is called or the iterator is released. This also enables
the resumption of iteration without first walking through the list of
dmabufs based on the pos value.
Fixes: 76ea95534995 ("bpf: Add dmabuf iterator")
Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier(a)google.com>
---
kernel/bpf/dmabuf_iter.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/dmabuf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/dmabuf_iter.c
index 4dd7ef7c145c..cd500248abd9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/dmabuf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/dmabuf_iter.c
@@ -6,10 +6,33 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+struct dmabuf_iter_priv {
+ /*
+ * If this pointer is non-NULL, the buffer's refcount is elevated to
+ * prevent destruction between stop/start. If reading is not resumed and
+ * start is never called again, then dmabuf_iter_seq_fini drops the
+ * reference when the iterator is released.
+ */
+ struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
+};
+
static void *dmabuf_iter_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
{
- if (*pos)
- return NULL;
+ struct dmabuf_iter_priv *p = seq->private;
+
+ if (*pos) {
+ struct dma_buf *dmabuf = p->dmabuf;
+
+ if (!dmabuf)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Always resume from where we stopped, regardless of the value
+ * of pos.
+ */
+ p->dmabuf = NULL;
+ return dmabuf;
+ }
return dma_buf_iter_begin();
}
@@ -54,8 +77,11 @@ static void dmabuf_iter_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
struct dma_buf *dmabuf = v;
- if (dmabuf)
- dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
+ if (dmabuf) {
+ struct dmabuf_iter_priv *p = seq->private;
+
+ p->dmabuf = dmabuf;
+ }
}
static const struct seq_operations dmabuf_iter_seq_ops = {
@@ -71,11 +97,27 @@ static void bpf_iter_dmabuf_show_fdinfo(const struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux,
seq_puts(seq, "dmabuf iter\n");
}
+static int dmabuf_iter_seq_init(void *priv, struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
+{
+ struct dmabuf_iter_priv *p = (struct dmabuf_iter_priv *)priv;
+
+ p->dmabuf = NULL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void dmabuf_iter_seq_fini(void *priv)
+{
+ struct dmabuf_iter_priv *p = (struct dmabuf_iter_priv *)priv;
+
+ if (p->dmabuf)
+ dma_buf_put(p->dmabuf);
+}
+
static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info dmabuf_iter_seq_info = {
.seq_ops = &dmabuf_iter_seq_ops,
- .init_seq_private = NULL,
- .fini_seq_private = NULL,
- .seq_priv_size = 0,
+ .init_seq_private = dmabuf_iter_seq_init,
+ .fini_seq_private = dmabuf_iter_seq_fini,
+ .seq_priv_size = sizeof(struct dmabuf_iter_priv),
};
static struct bpf_iter_reg bpf_dmabuf_reg_info = {
base-commit: 30f09200cc4aefbd8385b01e41bde2e4565a6f0e
--
2.52.0.177.g9f829587af-goog
Hi everybody,
we have documented here https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/driver-api/dma-buf.html#dma-fence-cr… that dma_fence objects must signal in a reasonable amount of time, but at the same time note that drivers might have a different idea of what reasonable means.
Recently I realized that this is actually not a good idea. Background is that the wall clock timeout means that for example the OOM killer might actually wait for this timeout to be able to terminate a process and reclaim the memory used. And this is just an example of how general kernel features might depend on that.
Some drivers and fence implementations used 10 seconds and that raised complains by end users. So at least amdgpu recently switched to 2 second which triggered an internal discussion about it.
This patch set here now adds a define to the dma_fence header which gives 2 seconds as reasonable amount of time. SW-sync is modified to always taint the kernel (since it doesn't has a timeout), VGEM is switched over to the new define and the scheduler gets a warning and taints the kernel if a driver uses a timeout longer than that.
I have not much intention of actually committing the patches (maybe except the SW-sync one), but question is if 2 seconds are reasonable?
Regards,
Christian.