Hi Randy,
~ typing on a mobile device, kindly excuse any typos
On Aug 17, 2014 2:45 AM, "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap(a)infradead.org> wrote:
>
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap(a)infradead.org>
>
> Fix kernel-doc warning, missing parameter description:
>
> Warning(..//include/linux/seqno-fence.h:99): No description found for
parameter 'cond'
Thanks for your patch; this is already fixed by Thierry Reading's patch and
is queued in for-next. [1]
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap(a)infradead.org>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)gmail.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)canonical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/seqno-fence.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Index: lnx-317-rc1/include/linux/seqno-fence.h
> ===================================================================
> --- lnx-317-rc1.orig/include/linux/seqno-fence.h
> +++ lnx-317-rc1/include/linux/seqno-fence.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ to_seqno_fence(struct fence *fence)
> * @context: the execution context this fence is a part of
> * @seqno_ofs: the offset within @sync_buf
> * @seqno: the sequence # to signal on
> + * @cond: the fence condition to check
> * @ops: the fence_ops for operations on this seqno fence
> *
> * This function initializes a struct seqno_fence with passed parameters,
Best regards,
Sumit.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/8/191
From: Thierry Reding <treding(a)nvidia.com>
The seqno_fence_init() function's cond argument isn't described in the
kerneldoc comment. Fix that to silence a warning when building DocBook
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding(a)nvidia.com>
---
include/linux/seqno-fence.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqno-fence.h b/include/linux/seqno-fence.h
index 3d6003de4b0d..a1ba6a5ccdd6 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqno-fence.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqno-fence.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ to_seqno_fence(struct fence *fence)
* @context: the execution context this fence is a part of
* @seqno_ofs: the offset within @sync_buf
* @seqno: the sequence # to signal on
+ * @cond: fence wait condition
* @ops: the fence_ops for operations on this seqno fence
*
* This function initializes a struct seqno_fence with passed parameters,
--
2.0.4
From: Thierry Reding <treding(a)nvidia.com>
kerneldoc doesn't know how to parse variables, so don't let it try.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding(a)nvidia.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/fence.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/fence.c
index 4222cb2aa96a..7bb9d65d9a2c 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/fence.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(fence_annotate_wait_on);
EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(fence_emit);
-/**
+/*
* fence context counter: each execution context should have its own
* fence context, this allows checking if fences belong to the same
* context or not. One device can have multiple separate contexts,
--
2.0.4
Dear Joonsoo,
I tried your changes which are present at the below link.
https://github.com/JoonsooKim/linux/tree/cma-fix-up-v3.0-next-20140625
But unfortunately for me it did not help much.
After running various apps that uses ION nonmovable memory, it fails to allocate memory after some time. When I see the pagetypeinfo shows lots of CMA pages available and non-movable were very less and thus nonmovable allocation were failing.
However I noticed the failure was little delayed.
Also I noticed that the CMA utilized and the CMA free is not matching with total CMA size.
In my system RAM is 256MB and CMA configured is 56MB.
And free memory was hanging around 30-40MB during failure.
Am I missing something?
My kernel version is 3.10 and I applied the changes manually.
If there are other sets of patches that needs to be applied, please let me know.
Note, I did not apply the ALLOC_CMA removal patches.
Now I am experimenting more and will share if I have any findings.
Thank you!
Pintu
Sent from Samsung Mobile
-------- Original message --------
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim(a)lge.com>
Date: 29/07/2014 5:06 PM (GMT+09:00)
To: 'pintu_agarwal' <pintu_agarwal(a)yahoo.com>,linux-mm@kvack.org,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,ritesh.list@gmail.com
Cc: pintu.k@outlook.com,pintu.k@samsung.com,vishu_1385@yahoo.com,m.szyprowski@samsung.com,mina86@mina86.com,ngupta@vflare.org,iqbalblr@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [linux-3.10.17] Could not allocate memory from free CMA areas
From: pintu_agarwal [mailto:pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 12:15 AM
To: PINTU KUMAR; linux-mm(a)kvack.org; linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org; linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org; iamjoonsoo.kim(a)lge.com; ritesh.list(a)gmail.com
Cc: pintu.k(a)outlook.com; pintu.k(a)samsung.com; vishu_1385(a)yahoo.com; m.szyprowski(a)samsung.com; mina86(a)mina86.com; ngupta(a)vflare.org; iqbalblr(a)gmail.com
Subject: RE: [linux-3.10.17] Could not allocate memory from free CMA areas
Dear joonsoo kim,
> I have your patches for: Aggressively allocate memory from cma ....
> We are facing almost similar problem here.
> If any of your patches still working for you please let us know here.
> I would like to try those approach.
Hello,
I stopped to implement it, because there are other bugs on CMA related codes.
Although aggressively allocate... doesn't have bugs itself, it enlarges
existing freepage counting bugs significantly so I'm first trying to fix
those bugs. See the below link.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/4/79
I will restart to implement aggressively... after fixing these bugs.
If you have interest on next version of aggressively allocate..., see the
following link.
https://github.com/JoonsooKim/linux/tree/cma-fix-up-v3.0-next-20140625
Thanks.
Hello,
(please ignore previous patchset, I've attached wrong version of patches)
This is one more respin of the patches which add support for creating
reserved memory regions defined in device tree. The last attempt
(http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-mm-sig/2014-February/003738.html)
ended in merging only half of the code, so right now we have complete
documentation merged and only basic code, which implements a half of it
is written in the documentation. Although the merged patches allow to
reserve memory, there is no way of using it for devices and drivers.
This situation makes CMA rather useless, as the main architecture (ARM),
which used it, has been converted from board-file based system
initialization to device tree. Thus there is no place to use direct
calls to dma_declare_contiguous() and some new solution, which bases on
device tree, is urgently needed.
This patch series fixes this issue. It provides two, already widely
discussed and already present in the kernel, drivers for reserved
memory: first based on DMA-coherent allocator, second using Contiguous
Memory Allocator. The first one nicely implements typical 'carved out'
reserved memory way of allocating contiguous buffers in a kernel-style
way. The memory is used exclusively by devices assigned to the given
memory region. The second one allows to reuse reserved memory for
movable kernel pages (like disk buffers, anonymous memory) and migrates
it out when device to allocates contiguous memory buffer. Both driver
provides memory buffers via standard dma-mapping API.
The patches have been rebased on top of latest CMA and mm changes merged
to akmp kernel tree.
To define a 64MiB CMA region following node is needed:
multimedia_reserved: multimedia_mem_region {
compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
reusable;
size = <0x4000000>;
alignment = <0x400000>;
};
Similarly, one can define 64MiB region with DMA coherent memory:
multimedia_reserved: multimedia_mem_region {
compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
no-map;
size = <0x4000000>;
alignment = <0x400000>;
};
Then the defined region can be assigned to devices:
scaler: scaler@12500000 {
memory-region = <&multimedia_reserved>;
/* ... */
};
codec: codec@12600000 {
memory-region = <&multimedia_reserved>;
/* ... */
};
Best regards
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Changes since v1:
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg343702.html)
- fixed possible memory leak in case of reserved memory allocation failure
(thanks to Joonsoo Kim)
Changes since the version posted in '[PATCH v6 00/11] reserved-memory
regions/CMA in devicetree, again' thread
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-mm-sig/2014-February/003738.html:
- rebased on top of '[PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved
area management code' patch series on v3.16-rc3
- improved dma-coherent driver, now it correctly handles assigning more
than one device to the given memory region
Patch summary:
Marek Szyprowski (4):
drivers: of: add automated assignment of reserved regions to client
devices
drivers: of: initialize and assign reserved memory to newly created
devices
drivers: dma-coherent: add initialization from device tree
drivers: dma-contiguous: add initialization from device tree
drivers/base/dma-coherent.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/of/platform.c | 7 ++
include/linux/cma.h | 3 +
include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h | 7 ++
mm/cma.c | 62 ++++++++++++++----
7 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
1.9.2
Dear joonsoo kim,
I have your patches for: Aggressively allocate memory from cma ....
We are facing almost similar problem here.
If any of your patches still working for you please let us know here.
I would like to try those approach.
Thank you
Sent from Samsung Mobile
-------- Original message --------
From: PINTU KUMAR <pintu_agarwal(a)yahoo.com>
Date: 09/07/2014 8:41 AM (GMT+09:00)
To: linux-mm@kvack.org,linux-mm@kvack.org,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: pintu.k@outlook.com,pintu.k@samsung.com,vishu_1385@yahoo.com,m.szyprowski@samsung.com,mina86@mina86.com,ngupta@vflare.org,iqbalblr@gmail.com
Subject: [linux-3.10.17] Could not allocate memory from free CMA areas
Hi,
We are facing one problem on linux 3.10 when we try to use CMA as large as 56MB for 256MB RAM device.
We found that after certain point of time (during boot), min watermark check is failing when "free_pages" and "free_cma_pages" are almost equal and falls below the min level.
system details:
ARM embedded device: RAM: 256MB
Kernel version: 3.10.17
Fixed Reserved memory: ~40MB
Available memory: 217MB
CMA reserved 1 : 56MB
ZRAM configured: 128MB or 64MB
min_free_kbytes: 1625 (default)
Memory controller group enabled (MEMCG)
After boot-up the "free -tm" command shows free memory as: ~50MB
CMA is used for all UI display purposes. CMA used during bootup is close to ~6MB.
Thus most of the free memory is in the form of CMA free memory.
ZRAM getting uses was around ~5MB.
During boot-up itself we observe that the following conditions are met.
if (free_pages - free_cma <= min + lowmem_reserve) {
printk"[PINTU]: __zone_watermark_ok: failed !\n");
return false;
}
Here: free_pages was: 12940, free_cma was: 12380, min: 566, lowmem: 0
Thus is condition is met most of the time.
And because of this watermark failure, Kswapd is waking up frequently.
The /proc/pagetypeinfo reports that most of the higher order pages are from CMA regions.
We also observed that ZRAM is trying to allocate memory from CMA region and failing.
We also tried by decreasing the CMA region to 20MB. With this the watermark failure is not happening in boot time. But if we launch more than 3 apps {Browser, music-player etc}, again the watermark started failing.
Also we tried decreasing the min_free_kbytes=256, and with this also watermark is passed.
Our observation is that ZRAM/zsmalloc trying to allocate memory from CMA areas and failed.
Please let us know if anybody have come across the same problem and how to resolve this issue.
Thank You!
Regards,
Pintu
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Bridgman, John <John.Bridgman(a)amd.com> wrote:
[snip away the discussion about hsa device discover, I'm hijacking
this thread just for the event/fence stuff here.]
> ... There's an event mechanism still to come - mostly for communicating fences and shader interrupts back to userspace, but also used for "device change" notifications, so no polling of sysfs.
That could would be interesting. On i915 my plan is to internally use
the recently added struct fence from Maarten. For the external
interface for userspace that wants explicit control over fences I'm
leaning towards polishing the android syncpt stuff (currently in
staging). But in any case I _really_ want to avoid that we end up with
multiple different and incompatible explicit fencing interfaces on
linux.
Adding relevant people.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch