Hi,
In case you haven't seen this yes, Ubuntu has a new (updated) site for
ODMs. Might be useful if you work on the Linaro Ubuntu LEB and
components.
http://odm.ubuntu.com/
Joey
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report & meeting
minutes
for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2011-12-09
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Status/2011-12-08
== Meeting Minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-12-07
== Summary ==
(For details, see the Weekly Status Report and Meeting Minutes )
* Linaro Connect http://connect.linaro.org/events/event/lcq1-12/
initial session blueprints are set:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sprints/lcq1-12?searchtext=power-management
* Common Clock
* Implemented notification will push the patches next.
* Discussion on going about where the common struct code will reside,
looks like it may stay in the kernel source while the binding code will be
in the DT.
* Cpuidle
* Submitted a patch for common ARM cpuidle patch
* Submitted v4 patches for exynos4210 cpuidle support with Russell
fixes.
* Sched_mc
* Preparing a new version of sched_mc for ARM
* Working on submitting a patch on scheduler and cpu_power, which has
been accepted into Nico Linaro-kernel tree
* Thermal Management
* Tested that temperature is reduced in production using the current
solution-done on Origen board.
* Added and posted the patch for a new trip type needed for cooling
devices like cpufreq.
* Working on adding a generic processor cooling devices(non ACPI based,
for ACPI already exists).
* Continue to work on i.MX6 cpufreq and thermal solution.
Best regards,
Mounir
--
Mounir Bsaibes
Project Manager
Follow Linaro.org:
facebook.com/pages/Linaro/155974581091106http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorghttp://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog>
Hi Mike
+int clk_register_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name, unsigned long flags,
+ struct clk *fixed_parent, void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx,
+ int set_to_enable)
+
How do you suggest handling gated clocks which are already running
when calling the register function?
On my kirkwood bases system, the bootloader has already turned on a
number of clocks. It does not seem right to start messing with
clk->enable_count and clk->prepare_count. Could clk_register_gate()
have one more parameter, a bool indicating running?
The kirkwood mach code keeps a bitmap of which platform_data init
functions are called from the board file. In a late_initcall function
it then enables and disables clocks as needed. What i was thinking is
i can ask the hardware what clocks are already running before i
register them and register them as running/not running. Then let the
driver probe functions use the API to enable clocks which are really
needed. In a late_initcall function, i would then call clk_disable(),
clk_unprepare() on clocks which the boot loader started, thus turning
them off if no driver has claimed them.
Is this how you envisage it working?
Thanks
Andrew
Hi,
The next RC of the Android toolchain 11.12 (this is more than likely
identical to the final) is ready.
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/toolchain-4.6-2011.…
It updates to the 11.12 release from the toolchain WG and makes sure
gold is built with gcc 4.5 so we don't get dependencies on a current
libstdc++.
I'm updating all official builds.
ttyl
bero
Hi John,
Attached is a somewhat cleaned up version of the USB patch that seems
to work on my pandaboard. I figured you could include it in your new
u-boot-linaro-stable repository in lieu of the other one.
I'm not quite sure how you want patches to work; do you want me to
submit patches to you, or should I just try to send them to upstream
u-boot as I have them?
Thanks,
--
Chris Lalancette
3.1 or 3.2?
Android seems to be going with 3.2 judging by a pre-release version,
what about the kernel working group and Ubuntu?
And where do we find out about these things? Because I find it a bit too
late to not find out until the releases is done.
--
Tixy
Hello John,
I'm currently working on bringing up a new OMAP4 board that is
similar in many respects to the pandaboard. While playing around with
the panda, I've noticed that upstream u-boot (from denx.de) has several
problems, starting with getting the USB/Ethernet hub up and running.
Additionally, I've noticed that the u-boot-linaro-stable tree seems to
work well on the same hardware.
Is there currently a plan for upstreaming some of the patches that
are currently being carried in u-boot-linaro-stable? If you needed some
help with this, I think I could find a bit of time to help out, though I
would only be able to personally test OMAP4 patches. Before starting
anything, though, I wanted to check in to see if there was a plan or if
this work was ongoing.
Thanks,
--
Chris Lalancette