Arnd, This one I've had no response. Shall I just do RESEND to maintainers? I don't see a special tree listed in the maintainers file so is it ok that I built this on staging-testing? If I need to rebase it, is it a RESEND or a new send. Does that question make sense? Thanks, alisons
----- Forwarded message from Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com -----
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:12:24 -0800 From: Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com To: jbottomley@odin.com Subject: gdth reviewer/maintainer ? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
James, email to Achim is bouncing. Is there another reviewer I should send this patch to? (Arnd has reviewed for y2038 group) Thanks, Alison
----- Forwarded message from Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com -----
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:44:07 -0800 From: Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com To: achim_leubner@adaptec.com, JBottomley@odin.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: gdth: replace struct timeval with ktime_get_real_seconds() X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4
struct timeval will overflow on 32-bit systems in y2038 and is being removed from the kernel. Replace the use of struct timeval and
On Wednesday 17 February 2016 10:56:58 Alison Schofield wrote:
Arnd, This one I've had no response. Shall I just do RESEND to maintainers?
Yes, note that "Martin K. Petersen" martin.petersen@oracle.com is now listed as a second SCSI maintainer to help out when James is not able to catch up with all patches.
It should be fine if you resend it to all of them now.
According to the git log, Achim was last active in 2012, using achim_leubner@pmc-sierra.com as his email address. PMC Sierra bought that part of Adaptec in 2010, so that was probably a valid address back then. This year, Microsemi bought PMC Sierra, which may have broken that address too, but he still seems to be working for them and doing Linux drivers, according to https://www.linkedin.com/in/achim-leubner-085a4a7
If the pmc-sierra address happens to still work, it would be nice if you could also send an update to the MAINTAINERS file as a follow-up.
Arnd
I don't see a special tree listed in the maintainers file so is it ok that I built this on staging-testing? If I need to rebase it, is it a RESEND or a new send. Does that question make sense? Thanks, alisons
----- Forwarded message from Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com -----
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:12:24 -0800 From: Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com To: jbottomley@odin.com Subject: gdth reviewer/maintainer ? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
James, email to Achim is bouncing. Is there another reviewer I should send this patch to? (Arnd has reviewed for y2038 group) Thanks, Alison
----- Forwarded message from Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com -----
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:44:07 -0800 From: Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com To: achim_leubner@adaptec.com, JBottomley@odin.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: gdth: replace struct timeval with ktime_get_real_seconds() X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4
struct timeval will overflow on 32-bit systems in y2038 and is being removed from the kernel. Replace the use of struct timeval and
-
Alison Schofield -
Arnd Bergmann