The nes infiniband driver uses current_kernel_time() to get a nanosecond granunarity timestamp to initialize its tcp sequence counters. This is one of only a few remaining users of that deprecated function, so we should try to get rid of it.
Aside from using a deprecated API, there are several problems I see here:
- Using a CLOCK_REALTIME based time source makes it predictable in case the time base is synchronized. - Using a coarse timestamp means it only gets updated once per jiffie, making it even more predictable in order to avoid having to access the hardware clock source - The upper 2 bits are always zero because the nanoseconds are at most 999999999.
For the Linux TCP implementation, we use secure_tcp_seq(), which appears to be appropriate here as well, and solves all the above problems.
I'm doing the same change in both versions of the nes driver, with i40iw being a later copy of the same code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de --- The above change is just a guess at what it should look like, please review carefully and Ack/Nak as appropriate. --- drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_cm.c | 8 +++++--- drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_cm.c | 8 +++++--- net/core/secure_seq.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_cm.c index 7b2655128b9f..da221d07f2dd 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_cm.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_cm.c @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include <net/addrconf.h> #include <net/ip6_route.h> #include <net/ip_fib.h> +#include <net/secure_seq.h> #include <net/tcp.h> #include <asm/checksum.h>
@@ -2164,7 +2165,6 @@ static struct i40iw_cm_node *i40iw_make_cm_node( struct i40iw_cm_listener *listener) { struct i40iw_cm_node *cm_node; - struct timespec ts; int oldarpindex; int arpindex; struct net_device *netdev = iwdev->netdev; @@ -2214,8 +2214,10 @@ static struct i40iw_cm_node *i40iw_make_cm_node( cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wscale = I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE; cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wnd = I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALED >> I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE; - ts = current_kernel_time(); - cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = ts.tv_nsec; + cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = secure_tcp_seq(htonl(cm_node->loc_addr[0]), + htonl(cm_node->rem_addr[0]), + htons(cm_node->loc_port), + htons(cm_node->rem_port)); cm_node->tcp_cntxt.mss = (cm_node->ipv4) ? (iwdev->vsi.mtu - I40IW_MTU_TO_MSS_IPV4) : (iwdev->vsi.mtu - I40IW_MTU_TO_MSS_IPV6);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_cm.c index 6cdfbf8c5674..2b67ace5b614 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_cm.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_cm.c @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ #include <net/neighbour.h> #include <net/route.h> #include <net/ip_fib.h> +#include <net/secure_seq.h> #include <net/tcp.h> #include <linux/fcntl.h>
@@ -1445,7 +1446,6 @@ static struct nes_cm_node *make_cm_node(struct nes_cm_core *cm_core, struct nes_cm_listener *listener) { struct nes_cm_node *cm_node; - struct timespec ts; int oldarpindex = 0; int arpindex = 0; struct nes_device *nesdev; @@ -1496,8 +1496,10 @@ static struct nes_cm_node *make_cm_node(struct nes_cm_core *cm_core, cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wscale = NES_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE; cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wnd = NES_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALED >> NES_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE; - ts = current_kernel_time(); - cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = htonl(ts.tv_nsec); + cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = secure_tcp_seq(htonl(cm_node->loc_addr), + htonl(cm_node->rem_addr), + htons(cm_node->loc_port), + htons(cm_node->rem_port)); cm_node->tcp_cntxt.mss = nesvnic->max_frame_size - sizeof(struct iphdr) - sizeof(struct tcphdr) - ETH_HLEN - VLAN_HLEN; cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_nxt = 0; diff --git a/net/core/secure_seq.c b/net/core/secure_seq.c index 7232274de334..af6ad467ed61 100644 --- a/net/core/secure_seq.c +++ b/net/core/secure_seq.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ u32 secure_tcp_seq(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, &net_secret); return seq_scale(hash); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(secure_tcp_seq);
u32 secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, __be16 dport) {
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:44:17AM -0600, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
The nes infiniband driver uses current_kernel_time() to get a nanosecond granunarity timestamp to initialize its tcp sequence counters. This is one of only a few remaining users of that deprecated function, so we should try to get rid of it.
Aside from using a deprecated API, there are several problems I see here:
- Using a CLOCK_REALTIME based time source makes it predictable in case the time base is synchronized.
- Using a coarse timestamp means it only gets updated once per jiffie, making it even more predictable in order to avoid having to access the hardware clock source
- The upper 2 bits are always zero because the nanoseconds are at most 999999999.
For the Linux TCP implementation, we use secure_tcp_seq(), which appears to be appropriate here as well, and solves all the above problems.
I'm doing the same change in both versions of the nes driver, with i40iw being a later copy of the same code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
Thanks Arnd for the patch!
[...]
@@ -2164,7 +2165,6 @@ static struct i40iw_cm_node *i40iw_make_cm_node( struct i40iw_cm_listener *listener) { struct i40iw_cm_node *cm_node;
- struct timespec ts; int oldarpindex; int arpindex; struct net_device *netdev = iwdev->netdev;
@@ -2214,8 +2214,10 @@ static struct i40iw_cm_node *i40iw_make_cm_node( cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wscale = I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE; cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wnd = I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALED >> I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE;
- ts = current_kernel_time();
- cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = ts.tv_nsec;
- cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = secure_tcp_seq(htonl(cm_node->loc_addr[0]),
htonl(cm_node->rem_addr[0]),
htons(cm_node->loc_port),
htons(cm_node->rem_port));
Should we not be using secure_tcpv6_seq() when we are ipv6?
Shiraz
cm_node->tcp_cntxt.mss = (cm_node->ipv4) ? (iwdev->vsi.mtu - I40IW_MTU_TO_MSS_IPV4) : (iwdev->vsi.mtu - I40IW_MTU_TO_MSS_IPV6);
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:01 AM, Shiraz Saleem shiraz.saleem@intel.com wrote:
@@ -2164,7 +2165,6 @@ static struct i40iw_cm_node *i40iw_make_cm_node( struct i40iw_cm_listener *listener) { struct i40iw_cm_node *cm_node;
struct timespec ts; int oldarpindex; int arpindex; struct net_device *netdev = iwdev->netdev;
@@ -2214,8 +2214,10 @@ static struct i40iw_cm_node *i40iw_make_cm_node( cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wscale = I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE; cm_node->tcp_cntxt.rcv_wnd = I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALED >> I40IW_CM_DEFAULT_RCV_WND_SCALE;
ts = current_kernel_time();
cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = ts.tv_nsec;
cm_node->tcp_cntxt.loc_seq_num = secure_tcp_seq(htonl(cm_node->loc_addr[0]),
htonl(cm_node->rem_addr[0]),
htons(cm_node->loc_port),
htons(cm_node->rem_port));
Should we not be using secure_tcpv6_seq() when we are ipv6?
I had not realized that there is a difference, but yes, from looking at that function it seems that we should. v2 coming now.
Arnd