Hi Paul,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 04:05, Paul Burton paul.burton@mips.com wrote:
Hi Firoz,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:44:20AM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/Makefile b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dc6bbb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +kapi := arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/asm +uapi := arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi/asm
+_dummy := $(shell [ -d '$(uapi)' ] || mkdir -p '$(uapi)') \
$(shell [ -d '$(kapi)' ] || mkdir -p '$(kapi)')+syscallo32 := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscall_o32.tbl +syscall64 := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscall_64.tbl +syscalln32 := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscall_n32.tbl +syshdr := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscallhdr.sh +systbl := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscalltbl.sh
Could we go with 'n64' instead of just '64'?
When we get nanoMIPS support we'll be introducing the p32 ABI, and there's a reasonable chance that the equivalent p64 ABI may come along in the future. Using 'n64' now would avoid confusion in that case where we may have 2 different 64-bit ABIs.
Sure, will do.
Thanks Firoz
Thanks, Paul