On 3 June 2015 at 03:19, Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
Subject line is horrible again.
"timekeeping: Introduce current_kernel_time64()"
Is precise and sufficient.
This patch adds current_kernel_time64() function with timespec64 type, and makes current_kernel_time() 'static inline' and moves it to
timekeeping.h
file.
Again, you describe WHAT the patch is doing first and clutter the changelog with completely irrelevant information.
It is convenient for user to get the current kernel time with timespec64
type,
What's conveniant about it?
and delete the current_kernel_time() function easily in timekeeping.h
file. That
is ready for 2038 when get the current time.
This makes no sense at all.
Again you should describe WHY current_kernel_time() must be replaced.
Thanks,
tglx
Ok, i'll add the description why should do the change and conversion. Thanks.