On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer acks before I add it to my tree.
Agreed. Feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
at least (whoever picks it up).
In reply to [1/3] John said
: Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing, : however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two : patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so : they can go via another tree?
However none of the patches are in linux-next.
John had qualms about [2/3], but it looks like a straightforward substitution in areas which will get plenty of testing
Yea. My main concern is just not stepping on any other maintainers toes.
I'll grab the patches for now to get them some external testing.
I'd be just as happy if the set went through you Andrew.
For the set: Acked-by: John Stultz john.stultz@linaro.org
thanks -john