Hi, John
On 07/09/2015 04:09 AM, John Stultz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Bamvor Zhang Jian bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org wrote:
+int get_timeval64(struct timeval64 *tv,
const struct __kernel_timeval __user *utv)
+{
struct __kernel_timeval ktv;
int ret;
ret = copy_from_user(&ktv, utv, sizeof(ktv));
if (ret)
return -EFAULT;
tv->tv_sec = ktv.tv_sec;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
|| is_compat_task()
+#endif
These sorts of ifdefs are to be avoided inside of functions.
Instead, it seems is_compat_task() should be defined to 0 in the !CONFIG_COMPAT case, so you can avoid the ifdefs and the compiler can still optimize it out.
I add this ifdef because I got compile failure on arm platform. This file do not include the <linux/compat.h> directly. And in arm64, compat.h is included implicitily. So, I am not sure what I should do here. Include <linux/compat.h> in this file directly or add a this check at the beginning of this file?
#ifndef is_compat_task #define is_compat_task() (0) #endif
Otherwise this looks similar to a patch Baolin (cc'ed) has been working on.
Yes.
regards
bamvor
thanks -john