From: John Stultz john.stultz@linaro.org Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 17:01:24 -0700
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer acks before I add it to my tree.
Agreed. Feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
at least (whoever picks it up).
In reply to [1/3] John said
: Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing, : however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two : patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so : they can go via another tree?
However none of the patches are in linux-next.
John had qualms about [2/3], but it looks like a straightforward substitution in areas which will get plenty of testing
Yea. My main concern is just not stepping on any other maintainers toes.
The networking changes look fine to me:
Acked-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net