On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:18 PM Darrick J. Wong darrick.wong@oracle.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 04:02:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:17 PM Darrick J. Wong darrick.wong@oracle.com wrote:
Hmm, so one thing that I clean up on the way to bigtime is the total lack of clamping here. If (for example) it's September 2105 and rtbtimelimit is set to 1 year, this will cause an integer overflow. The quota timer will be set to 1970 and expire immediately, rather than what I'd consider the best effort of February 2106.
One more hing to note (I will add this to the changelog text) is that on
Ok, I'll look for it in the next revision you send out.
By the way, would you mind cc'ing the xfs list on all 24 patches? They probably aren't directly relevant to xfs, but it does make it a lot easier for us to look at the other 21 patches and think "Oh, ok, so there isn't some core infrastructure change that we're not seeing".
I wasn't planning on sending the full series once more, as there were very few comments now. I've sent the three XFS patches again by themselves now. If you can pick these up, I'll put the rest into linux-next to give them some more testing, and hopefully have others pick up a couple more before I send a pull request.
Arnd