Arnd, This one I've had no response. Shall I just do RESEND to maintainers? I don't see a special tree listed in the maintainers file so is it ok that I built this on staging-testing? If I need to rebase it, is it a RESEND or a new send. Does that question make sense? Thanks, alisons
----- Forwarded message from Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com -----
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:12:24 -0800 From: Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com To: jbottomley@odin.com Subject: gdth reviewer/maintainer ? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
James, email to Achim is bouncing. Is there another reviewer I should send this patch to? (Arnd has reviewed for y2038 group) Thanks, Alison
----- Forwarded message from Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com -----
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:44:07 -0800 From: Alison Schofield amsfield22@gmail.com To: achim_leubner@adaptec.com, JBottomley@odin.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y2038@lists.linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: gdth: replace struct timeval with ktime_get_real_seconds() X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4
struct timeval will overflow on 32-bit systems in y2038 and is being removed from the kernel. Replace the use of struct timeval and