On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
Subject line is horrible again.
"timekeeping: Introduce current_kernel_time64()"
Is precise and sufficient.
This patch adds current_kernel_time64() function with timespec64 type, and makes current_kernel_time() 'static inline' and moves it to timekeeping.h file.
Again, you describe WHAT the patch is doing first and clutter the changelog with completely irrelevant information.
It is convenient for user to get the current kernel time with timespec64 type,
What's conveniant about it?
and delete the current_kernel_time() function easily in timekeeping.h file. That is ready for 2038 when get the current time.
This makes no sense at all.
Again you should describe WHY current_kernel_time() must be replaced.
Thanks,
tglx