Hi Finn,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:56 PM Finn Thain fthain@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, I wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I'd suggest we do it like below to make it consistent with the rest again, using the 1904..2040 range of dates and no warning for invalid dates.
If you agree, I'll send that as a proper patch.
Geert may instead wish to fixup or revert the patch he has committed already...
Geert, how do you want to handle this?
Do you want a fixup patch or a v3 patch with the WARN_ON and the other two issues addressed?
Please send a fixup patch, for the m68k/master branch, which is non-rebasing. I'll fold it into the original commit on the m68k/for-next branch.
I'm willing to send either one if Arnd is okay with that. I'd really like to resolve this before the merge window opens, since my PMU patch series is affected.
+1. If it's not resolved (a few days) before the merge window opens, I may have to revert the patch instead.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert