On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Stephan Mueller smueller@chronox.de wrote:
Hi John, Herbert,
Changes v2: use ktime_get_ns instead of ktime_get_raw_ns
The testing was re-performed and indicate no difference to the previous testing.
Thanks for following through on this. This version addresses my concerns about using specialized time accessors without clear rational.
thanks -john